Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:54:54 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: We could have brought in many more troops if Rumsfeld had set up the invasion that way. He didn't. They were really trying to avoid an invasion for political reasons both here and in Kabul. WHAT??? The whole point of going after Afg. was bin laden. The politics were go for it in the American public's view. Something like 90% approval. There was a 90% approval to "get Bin Laden" but if you polled the country about a 60,000 man force, going to 100,000 men by the end of this year you would have been polling at around 40%. where Obama is now. To the Afghanis, we are just the Soviets invading them again. That was what we were trying to avoid. Jim's contention that 4000 marines was going to get the job done is countered by the fact that 60,000 isn't getting the job done. You have a cite for this Bush-era poll? I doubt it. Not sure about Jim's contention. I didn't see it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Woman proves gun effective | General | |||
OT Michael Moore proves he is the sicko | ASA | |||
Google proves MacGregor 26 is flimsy | ASA | |||
Ellen proves the Good Captain Correct! | ASA |