On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 05:25:06 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Jul 6, 6:21*am, bpuharic wrote:
after destroying the middle class, wall street contributions to the
dems has dropped like a rock since the dems started *pushing wall
street reforms. *the GOP, fresh from its apologies to BP because obama
hurt the oil company's feelings, is picking up contributions.

who says the right wing doesnt love thieves and thugs...as long as
they're rich

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...10/07/05/AR201...

Let's see... Wall St. was a strong Dem supporter while the financial
crash was building and the Dems were in control of the house

gee the pres for the last 22 of 30 years was GOP. and for most of that
time the house and senate was....GOP

and i guess it shows the dems can't be bought like the GOP

.... the
Dems setup the rules that allowed the crash to happen... that blood is
on the Democrat's hands.

let's see...it was phil gramm who wrote the rules stripping the SEC of
regulatory power over banking houses...he was a GOP...

and it was free market fundamentalism of eugene fama, milton friedman,
alan greenspan, etc. that caused this...the type of worship of the
free market that the GOP is so fond of and caused them to apologize to
BP for hurting its feelings



The Dems sure didn't seem to have an issue taking those "thieves and
thugs" money, while cozying up to them, did they? And now Barney
Frank is set to protect them:

ROFLMAO!! i guess that's why wall street's money is running tot he
GOP!!

On Jul 6, 6:53*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 05:25:06 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

The Dems sure didn't seem to have an issue taking those "thieves and
thugs" money, while cozying up to them, did they? *And now Barney
Frank is set to protect them:

ROFLMAO!! i guess that's why wall street's money is running tot he
GOP!!

ROFLMAO!!! Wall Street's money was going to the DEMOCRATS while the
excess profit taking and crash was going on, and the DEMOCRATS were
protecting their cash cow.!!!

Wall Street has come to their senses and is backing the correct party
now. They don't want the US to fail... that would kill their profits.

On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:30:26 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Jul 6, 6:53*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 05:25:06 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

The Dems sure didn't seem to have an issue taking those "thieves and
thugs" money, while cozying up to them, did they? *And now Barney
Frank is set to protect them:

ROFLMAO!! i guess that's why wall street's money is running tot he
GOP!!

ROFLMAO!!! Wall Street's money was going to the DEMOCRATS

past tense you notice. now that the dems are getting tough, the GOP is
leaping to the defense of wall street

while the
excess profit taking and crash was going on, and the DEMOCRATS were
protecting their cash cow.!!!

since the dems were out of power...exactly how did they accomplish
this magical feat?


Wall Street has come to their senses and is backing the correct party
now. They don't want the US to fail... that would kill their profits.

so they figure they'll buy the GOP and make sure they can continue to
steal.

uh huh

On Jul 6, 9:47*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:30:26 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Jul 6, 6:53 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 05:25:06 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

The Dems sure didn't seem to have an issue taking those "thieves and
thugs" money, while cozying up to them, did they? And now Barney
Frank is set to protect them:

ROFLMAO!! i guess that's why wall street's money is running tot he
GOP!!

ROFLMAO!!! *Wall Street's money was going to the DEMOCRATS

past tense you notice. now that the dems are getting tough, the GOP is
leaping to the defense of wall street


Remember my linked article? It's Barney Frank, a Dem, who is going to
save them.

excess profit taking and crash was going on, and the DEMOCRATS were
protecting their cash cow.!!!

since the dems were out of power...exactly how did they accomplish
this magical feat?

From your own article:
"Donors from that area have given $8.7 million this year, compared
with $23.9 million at this point in the 2008 cycle, with most of those
contributions coming from big contributors in the financial sector.
New York donors had given congressional Democrats almost twice as much
money at this stage of the 2006 midterm campaigns, when Republicans
ruled both chambers and held the White House. "

IOW, Wall Street installed the Dems, and the Dems protected them with
their majorities. Until it all collapsed...



Wall Street has come to their senses and is backing the correct party
now. *They don't want the US to fail... that would kill their profits.

so they figure they'll buy the GOP and make sure they can continue to
steal.

uh huh

But your article doesn't support your assertions...
"The two Republican committees that are focused on congressional races
have received $2.7 million from the New York area, slightly more than
at this point in 2008 but less than the $4 million they raised at this
point in the 2004 cycle when the party still controlled Congress."

The Dems lost about 15 million, and the GOP has picked up a million or
so. Sounds more like Wall Street has just quit giving, period.


'He has a long way to go. Sessions had $12 million in the bank at the
end of May, while the DCCC had $28.6 million. But Sessions finds
himself in far better shape than his predecessor, who trailed
Democrats by 8 to 1 in ready cash for the five-month sprint to finish
the 2008 campaign season."

Who else are buying the Dems? Where is all that big money coming
from? Corruption runs deep in the DNC. Uh-huh.

On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 04:05:29 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Jul 6, 9:47*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:30:26 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:


past tense you notice. now that the dems are getting tough, the GOP is
leaping to the defense of wall street


Remember my linked article? It's Barney Frank, a Dem, who is going to
save them.

so you say. unfortunately he can't. only the GOP can filibuster. sorry


excess profit taking and crash was going on, and the DEMOCRATS were
protecting their cash cow.!!!

since the dems were out of power...exactly how did they accomplish
this magical feat?

From your own article:
"Donors from that area have given $8.7 million this year, compared
with $23.9 million at this point in the 2008 cycle,

gee. wall street is so in love with what the dems are doing that
they've dropped donations by 75%.

yeah. im sure that's a love affair


IOW, Wall Street installed the Dems, and Dems protected them with
their majorities. Until it all collapsed...

ROFLMAO!! it was the RIGHT WING...alan greenspan, milton friedman,
phil gramm who screamed that hte market was efficient and must be left
alone

remember: smaller govt? less regulation? just like the tea baggers
today

how'd that work out?




Wall Street has come to their senses and is backing the correct party
now. *They don't want the US to fail... that would kill their profits.

so they figure they'll buy the GOP and make sure they can continue to
steal.

uh huh

But your article doesn't support your assertions...
"The two Republican committees that are focused on congressional races
have received $2.7 million from the New York area, slightly more than
at this point in 2008 but less than the $4 million they raised at this
point in the 2004 cycle when the party still controlled Congress."

and the donations to the dems?

dropped by 75%. sure looks like wall street is getting its dick
sucked by the right wing.


The Dems lost about 15 million, and the GOP has picked up a million or
so. Sounds more like Wall Street has just quit giving, period.

gee. i guess that's why the GOP recently held a closed door meeting
with 25 of wall street's top bankers


Who else are buying the Dems? Where is all that big money coming
from? Corruption runs deep in the DNC. Uh-huh.

yeah. makes alot of sense with the 75% drop in bribe money from wall
street

your logic is impeccable.

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:41:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:47:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

ROFLMAO!!! Wall Street's money was going to the DEMOCRATS

past tense you notice. now that the dems are getting tough, the GOP is
leaping to the defense of wall street

while the
excess profit taking and crash was going on, and the DEMOCRATS were
protecting their cash cow.!!!

since the dems were out of power...exactly how did they accomplish
this magical feat?


We haven't really had a Democrat president in the fiscal sense since
Jimmy Carter

this is known as the 'no true scotsman' fallacy. no scotsmen drink,
you see. you point out a scotsman who DOES and it's proof he's not a
scotsman

you right wingers...you believe all the bull**** your leaders tell you
to believe all the while they're stealing your wallet.

On 06/07/2010 9:08 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:41:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:47:51 -0400, wrote:

ROFLMAO!!! Wall Street's money was going to the DEMOCRATS

past tense you notice. now that the dems are getting tough, the GOP is
leaping to the defense of wall street

while the
excess profit taking and crash was going on, and the DEMOCRATS were
protecting their cash cow.!!!

since the dems were out of power...exactly how did they accomplish
this magical feat?


We haven't really had a Democrat president in the fiscal sense since
Jimmy Carter

this is known as the 'no true scotsman' fallacy. no scotsmen drink,
you see. you point out a scotsman who DOES and it's proof he's not a
scotsman

you right wingers...you believe all the bull**** your leaders tell you
to believe all the while they're stealing your wallet.

You are begining to sound like Polly.

--
Governemnt debt is tax servitude for the middle class.

On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 06:20:10 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 06/07/2010 9:08 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:41:04 -0400, wrote:


you right wingers...you believe all the bull**** your leaders tell you
to believe all the while they're stealing your wallet.

You are begining to sound like Polly.

and you're sounding like william luther pierce

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:36:31 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:08:25 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:41:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:47:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:


you right wingers...you believe all the bull**** your leaders tell you
to believe all the while they're stealing your wallet.
`

I only need one example. Rubin. He was Clinton't chief economic
advisor. He is the one who pushed congress to remove regulation on the
banks, then he went to work for Citigroup and they gave him over $100
million bucks. Isn't that exactly the kind of rich ******* you are
railing on about?

i absolutely agree the right wing had GREAT marketiing over the last
30 years. and they still do. look at the tea baggers telling us that,
if we DONT regulate wall street, everything will be just great.

people bought that ****. they still do. wall street money is flowing
into GOP coffers at record rates.

the GOP is still protecting the rich

On Jul 7, 5:52*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:36:31 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:08:25 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:41:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:47:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

you right wingers...you believe all the bull**** your leaders tell you
to believe all the while they're stealing your wallet.
`

I only need one example. Rubin. He was Clinton't chief economic
advisor. He is the one who pushed congress to remove regulation on the
banks, then he went to work for Citigroup and they gave him over $100
million bucks. Isn't that exactly the kind of rich ******* you are
railing on about?

i absolutely agree the right wing had GREAT marketiing over the last
30 years. and they still do. look at the tea baggers telling us that,
if we DONT regulate wall street, everything will be just great.

people bought that ****. *they still do. wall street money is flowing
into GOP coffers at record rates.

Nope... not according to your own article.


the GOP is still protecting the rich

It's the DNC that was, and still is, in bed with Wall Street.

I love it that your article proves that the Dems were the party on the
take from Wall Street during the crash.