Is the world better off for having more animals?
 

On 6/24/2010 12:22 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:

On 6/24/2010 12:11 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:

On 6/24/2010 11:59 AM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:

On 6/24/2010 11:18 AM, oxtail wrote:
[...]

No, the world is not better off. The world does not have a welfare.


I didn't ask for your opinion.

I didn't give you an opinion.


Are they factual statements?

Yes.


If so, are they falsifiable?

Have a go at it.


Care to show us how?

Do your own homework, fat boy.

Is the world better off for having more animals?
 

Fred C. Dobbs wrote:

On 6/24/2010 12:22 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:

On 6/24/2010 12:11 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:

On 6/24/2010 11:59 AM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:

On 6/24/2010 11:18 AM, oxtail wrote:
[...]

No, the world is not better off. The world does not have a
welfare.


I didn't ask for your opinion.

I didn't give you an opinion.


Are they factual statements?

Yes.


If so, are they falsifiable?

Have a go at it.


Care to show us how?

Do your own homework, fat boy.


Are you withdrawing your statements?

--
Oxtail is not doing what he thinks he is doing here.

Is the world better off for having more animals?
 

On 6/24/2010 12:30 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:

On 6/24/2010 12:22 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:

On 6/24/2010 12:11 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:

On 6/24/2010 11:59 AM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:

On 6/24/2010 11:18 AM, oxtail wrote:
[...]

No, the world is not better off. The world does not have a
welfare.


I didn't ask for your opinion.

I didn't give you an opinion.


Are they factual statements?

Yes.


If so, are they falsifiable?

Have a go at it.


Care to show us how?

Do your own homework, fat boy.


Are you withdrawing your statements?

No, fat boy.

"Consideration for the lives of farm animals" - meaningless tripe
 

On Jun 24, 1:27*am, "Fred C. Dobbs"
wrote:
All it means is wanting the animals to exist. *If someone wants the
animals that ****wit wishes to eat to exist, then ****wit says the
person has "consideration for their lives". *If someone doesn't want
those animals to exist, then ****wit shrieks they have "no consideration
for their lives", and he berates them for not wanting the animals to
exist.

It's ****witted tripe; nothing more.

So is this ****wit thread, and the author.Cross-posting douchebag.