|
Analogizing among different types of entities
A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous
to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
On Jun 23, 11:00*am, "Fred C. Dobbs"
wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. *A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. You're analogous to idiocy. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
On Jun 23, 12:00*pm, "Fred C. Dobbs"
Speaking of species, whats the best fishing in your area, Fred. Around here it's crappie, bluegil , catfish,a nd if you go over on the river every once in a while you cac catch sturgeon. Fishings not bad . How about you? |
Analogizing among different types of entities
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? -- Oxtail is not doing what he thinks he is doing here. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? -- Oxtail is not doing what he thinks he is doing here. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
On 6/23/2010 12:23 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? Animals? No. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
On 6/23/2010 12:23 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? Animals? No. How about robots? -- Oxtail is not doing what he thinks he is doing here. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
On 6/23/2010 1:21 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 12:23 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? Animals? No. How about robots? No. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
On 6/23/2010 1:21 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 12:23 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? Animals? No. How about robots? No. How about human families? -- Oxtail is not doing what he thinks he is doing here. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
On 6/23/2010 6:19 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 1:21 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 12:23 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? Animals? No. How about robots? No. How about human families? Families do not have rights. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
On 6/23/2010 6:19 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 1:21 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 12:23 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? Animals? No. How about robots? No. How about human families? Families do not have rights. Actually in the old days, certain families were given monopoly rights in many cultures. -- Oxtail is not doing what he thinks he is doing here. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
On 6/23/2010 8:06 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 6:19 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 1:21 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 12:23 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? Animals? No. How about robots? No. How about human families? Families do not have rights. Actually in the old days, certain families were given monopoly rights in many cultures. The family didn't hold the right. The head of the family held it. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
On 6/23/2010 8:06 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 6:19 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 1:21 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 12:23 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? Animals? No. How about robots? No. How about human families? Families do not have rights. Actually in the old days, certain families were given monopoly rights in many cultures. The family didn't hold the right. The head of the family held it. Where? -- Oxtail is not doing what he thinks he is doing here. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
On 6/23/2010 8:29 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 8:06 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 6:19 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 1:21 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 12:23 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? Animals? No. How about robots? No. How about human families? Families do not have rights. Actually in the old days, certain families were given monopoly rights in many cultures. The family didn't hold the right. The head of the family held it. Where? Wherever the monopoly granters could enforce the monopoly. You are such a simpleton. What's funny is that you imagine yourself the most clever boy in the class, and that alone makes you a simpleton. You dance, but not to your own tune. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
"Fred C. Dobbs" wrote in message ... On 6/23/2010 6:19 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 1:21 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 12:23 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? Animals? No. How about robots? No. How about human families? Families do not have rights. there is a right to family life. do you think it should be respected, to any extent, in animals? slaves? |
Analogizing among different types of entities
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
On 6/23/2010 8:29 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 8:06 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 6:19 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 1:21 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 12:23 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? Animals? No. How about robots? No. How about human families? Families do not have rights. Actually in the old days, certain families were given monopoly rights in many cultures. The family didn't hold the right. The head of the family held it. Where? Wherever the monopoly granters could enforce the monopoly. You are such a simpleton. What's funny is that you imagine yourself the most clever boy in the class, and that alone makes you a simpleton. You dance, but not to your own tune. You sound upset. Can the right be inherited even before the head of the family die? -- Oxtail is not doing what he thinks he is doing here. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
On 6/23/2010 9:12 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 8:29 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 8:06 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 6:19 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 1:21 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 12:23 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? Animals? No. How about robots? No. How about human families? Families do not have rights. Actually in the old days, certain families were given monopoly rights in many cultures. The family didn't hold the right. The head of the family held it. Where? Wherever the monopoly granters could enforce the monopoly. You are such a simpleton. What's funny is that you imagine yourself the most clever boy in the class, and that alone makes you a simpleton. You dance, but not to your own tune. You sound upset. No, I don't. That comment was just another lame "zen game" feint, easily brushed aside. You sound desperate. You really do. You also are a simpleton - a simpleton who deludes himself with the fantasy that he's complex. That's the most amusing kind of simpleton. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
On Jun 23, 10:18*pm, "Fred C. Dobbs"
wrote: On 6/23/2010 9:12 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 8:29 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 8:06 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 6:19 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 1:21 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 12:23 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. *A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. *Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? Animals? *No. How about robots? No. How about human families? Families do not have rights. Actually in the old days, certain families were given monopoly rights in many cultures. The family didn't hold the right. *The head of the family held it. Where? Wherever the monopoly granters could enforce the monopoly. You are such a simpleton. *What's funny is that you imagine yourself the most clever boy in the class, and that alone makes you a simpleton. *You dance, but not to your own tune. You sound upset. No, I don't. *That comment was just another lame "zen game" feint, easily brushed aside. You sound desperate. *You really do. *You also are a simpleton - a simpleton who deludes himself with the fantasy that he's complex. That's the most amusing kind of simpleton.- That would be you, Goo. |
Analogizing among different types of entities
On 6/23/2010 11:41 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
On Jun 23, 10:18 pm, "Fred C. wrote: On 6/23/2010 9:12 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 8:29 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 8:06 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 6:19 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 1:21 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 12:23 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/23/2010 11:15 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: A corporation is not analogous to a species. A corporation is analogous to a single organism within a species. Corporations taken together are not analogous to a species; they are analogous to a breed. Species, subspecies, breeds. Any of them will do. Sorry, no - they're not the same. Do farm animal breeds have any rights? Breeds don't have rights. Animals individually don't have rights. Do you think it is possible for us to give them some? Animals? No. How about robots? No. How about human families? Families do not have rights. Actually in the old days, certain families were given monopoly rights in many cultures. The family didn't hold the right. The head of the family held it. Where? Wherever the monopoly granters could enforce the monopoly. You are such a simpleton. What's funny is that you imagine yourself the most clever boy in the class, and that alone makes you a simpleton. You dance, but not to your own tune. You sound upset. No, I don't. That comment was just another lame "zen game" feint, easily brushed aside. You sound desperate. You really do. You also are a simpleton - a simpleton who deludes himself with the fantasy that he's complex. That's the most amusing kind of simpleton.- That would be There was no 12-year-old, you stupid ****stain. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com