In article ,
says...

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 05/06/2010 8:10 PM, hk wrote:
.
wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:
This is for all the Dopers suffering from sexual identity crisis...
that would be you....... Freak, Looney etc.

re your obsession with 'chick cars'....
Note; the Toyota RAV4 isn't on the list.
http://autos.ca.msn.com/editors-pick...entid=24457813
That's over 10 years old, dumbass.

Suck on this...

http://editorial.autos.msn.com/artic...umentid=435226

Yup the Rav 4 is a great car for my little buddy.
Both Polk and Strategic Vision listed the Toyota RAV4 as a very popular
choice for women. In Polk's vehicle registration analysis for 2003, 57.4
percent of the RAV4s sold were registered by women. This made it No. 1 in
terms of Polk's percentage of women buyers.

Guess that makes him your bitch.


You're talking to a spoofer....... genius.

Spoofer or Donnie White, you really can't tell the difference.

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 05/06/2010 8:10 PM, hk wrote:
.
wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:
This is for all the Dopers suffering from sexual identity crisis...
that would be you....... Freak, Looney etc.

re your obsession with 'chick cars'....
Note; the Toyota RAV4 isn't on the list.
http://autos.ca.msn.com/editors-pick...entid=24457813
That's over 10 years old, dumbass.

Suck on this...

http://editorial.autos.msn.com/artic...umentid=435226

Yup the Rav 4 is a great car for my little buddy.
Both Polk and Strategic Vision listed the Toyota RAV4 as a very
popular
choice for women. In Polk's vehicle registration analysis for 2003,
57.4
percent of the RAV4s sold were registered by women. This made it No. 1
in
terms of Polk's percentage of women buyers.

Guess that makes him your bitch.


You're talking to a spoofer....... genius.

Spoofer or Donnie White, you really can't tell the difference.



Duh! It was an hk spoofer..Bertie.

YukonBound wrote:


"Larry" wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:
This is for all the Dopers suffering from sexual identity crisis...
that would be you....... Freak, Looney etc.

re your obsession with 'chick cars'....
Note; the Toyota RAV4 isn't on the list.
http://autos.ca.msn.com/editors-pick...entid=24457813

That's over 10 years old, dumbass.

Suck on this...

http://editorial.autos.msn.com/artic...umentid=435226

Where does it say my survey is 10 years old Dumbass.... on the other
hand...yours is 7 years old...well before the current large roomy,
powerful version of the RAV4... especially the V6 version, which could
probably leave your 'merican version BMW's in the dust.

Note: from your site..
"Both Polk and Strategic Vision listed the Toyota RAV4 as a very
popular choice for women. In Polk's vehicle registration analysis for
2003, 57.4 percent of the RAV4s sold were registered by women. This
made it No. 1 in terms of Polk's percentage of women buyers."



My first clue was the Honda Del Sol. Production ended in 1998.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_CR-X_del_Sol

On 06/06/2010 4:32 PM, YukonBound wrote:


"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 05/06/2010 8:10 PM, hk wrote:
.
wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:
This is for all the Dopers suffering from sexual identity crisis...
that would be you....... Freak, Looney etc.

re your obsession with 'chick cars'....
Note; the Toyota RAV4 isn't on the list.

http://autos.ca.msn.com/editors-pick...entid=24457813

That's over 10 years old, dumbass.

Suck on this...

http://editorial.autos.msn.com/artic...umentid=435226

Yup the Rav 4 is a great car for my little buddy.
Both Polk and Strategic Vision listed the Toyota RAV4 as a very
popular
choice for women. In Polk's vehicle registration analysis for
2003, 57.4
percent of the RAV4s sold were registered by women. This made it
No. 1 in
terms of Polk's percentage of women buyers.

Guess that makes him your bitch.


You're talking to a spoofer....... genius.

Spoofer or Donnie White, you really can't tell the difference.



Duh! It was an hk spoofer..Bertie.

Or was it hk not taking his meds.

--
Liberalism - a disease of envy, greed, entitlement and KAOS.

"YukonBound" wrote in message
...


"W1TEF" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 10:15:33 -0300, "YukonBound"
wrote:

The 3rd version of the RAV4 (2006- up) is almost as big as the old
Highlanders and with the optional V6 .. more powerful.

Give it up Don - it's a chick car. :)

Hey - you take the Yukon out yet? Did you ever put that bimini top on
the boat?

'Cause if you did, you turned it into a chick boat. :)

Seriously - been out at all? I'm seriously thinking of buying another
one - should never have sold that boat to you - I miss it. :)

I believe the weather has finally turned for the better... so any day now.
I've been talking to the bimini factory about the mounting fittings.
I'd rather use the top of gunnel mounts, but the framework would have to
be
stretched another 3.5" wider...this may force me to get nylon wedges so
the
'eye end' on the framework can rotate easily in the fitting.
The company also sent along 'side mounting' hardware that would fit better
on the 3/4" spacers I cut from a Starboard type plastic.
These fittings would be on the inside of the boat directly under the
gunnel....... a smaller version of the way you had the rod holders
attached.


Whoops...images a little big.
I'm still struggling with new software.

On 6/8/2010 1:06 PM, YukonBound wrote:

I believe the weather has finally turned for the better... so any day
now.
I've been talking to the bimini factory about the mounting fittings.
I'd rather use the top of gunnel mounts, but the framework would have
to be
stretched another 3.5" wider...this may force me to get nylon wedges
so the
'eye end' on the framework can rotate easily in the fitting.
The company also sent along 'side mounting' hardware that would fit
better
on the 3/4" spacers I cut from a Starboard type plastic.
These fittings would be on the inside of the boat directly under the
gunnel....... a smaller version of the way you had the rod holders
attached.


Why don't you FEDEX the boat to the factory and let them fit you up with
a nifty top.

In article ,
says...

"YukonBound" wrote in message
...


"W1TEF" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 10:15:33 -0300, "YukonBound"
wrote:

The 3rd version of the RAV4 (2006- up) is almost as big as the old
Highlanders and with the optional V6 .. more powerful.

Give it up Don - it's a chick car. :)

Hey - you take the Yukon out yet? Did you ever put that bimini top on
the boat?

'Cause if you did, you turned it into a chick boat. :)

Seriously - been out at all? I'm seriously thinking of buying another
one - should never have sold that boat to you - I miss it. :)

I believe the weather has finally turned for the better... so any day now.
I've been talking to the bimini factory about the mounting fittings.
I'd rather use the top of gunnel mounts, but the framework would have to
be
stretched another 3.5" wider...this may force me to get nylon wedges so
the
'eye end' on the framework can rotate easily in the fitting.
The company also sent along 'side mounting' hardware that would fit better
on the 3/4" spacers I cut from a Starboard type plastic.
These fittings would be on the inside of the boat directly under the
gunnel....... a smaller version of the way you had the rod holders
attached.


Whoops...images a little big.
I'm still struggling with new software.

Little buddy, I told you to consult me when doing things like this. It
makes you look silly if you try it on your own.

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 10:15:33 -0300, "YukonBound"
wrote:

The 3rd version of the RAV4 (2006- up) is almost as big as the old
Highlanders and with the optional V6 .. more powerful.

Give it up Don - it's a chick car. :)

Hey - you take the Yukon out yet? Did you ever put that bimini top on
the boat?

'Cause if you did, you turned it into a chick boat. :)

Seriously - been out at all? I'm seriously thinking of buying another
one - should never have sold that boat to you - I miss it. :)

They have a show on TV about people like you, its called "Hoarders."

"W1TEF" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:01:47 -0300, "YukonBound"
wrote:

These fittings would be on the inside of the boat directly under the
gunnel....... a smaller version of the way you had the rod holders
attached.

That'll work fine - just make sure you use non-magnetic stainless
hardware to secure the fittings to the side of the boat.

Should look pretty cool actually - not that I would use one you
understand - would't want to have any of my boats turned into a chick
boat. :)


I'm an inner-city boy...... more concerned about practical matters than
fashion.
But...if it does attract the 'chicks', so be it!

In article ,
says...

"W1TEF" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:01:47 -0300, "YukonBound"
wrote:

These fittings would be on the inside of the boat directly under the
gunnel....... a smaller version of the way you had the rod holders
attached.

That'll work fine - just make sure you use non-magnetic stainless
hardware to secure the fittings to the side of the boat.

Should look pretty cool actually - not that I would use one you
understand - would't want to have any of my boats turned into a chick
boat. :)


I'm an inner-city boy...... more concerned about practical matters than
fashion.
But...if it does attract the 'chicks', so be it!

Kind of like your RAV4?