Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,525
Default I'd rather have the oil

REP. ALAN GRAYSON (D-FL) wants Repubs sent to prison for supporting
drilling but he can start with me (although I am not repub) and I'll
make him look as foolish as he is.
MY beaches (Yes MINE as I am a 5th gen Florida native) used to be
pristine and clear of condos and I could walk them without some idjit
yankee telling me it belongs to him. There used to be salt marshes
that produced crabs and redfish but they were filled for development
spurred by tourism. I used to be able to walk into the sand dunes to
a sheltered spot and build a fire and see the glory of the night sky,
now the dunes were levelled for hotels and the night sky is nothing
but neon. Given a choice between tar balls and tourism, there is no
doubt, I'd take the tar balls. Oil jobs pay well, tourism pays
minimum wage. Once condos foul the beaches, it is effectively forever
whereas the oil will be gone soon enough. I'd go so far as to believe
that tourists with their suntan grease have probably put more oil in
MY beach sand than BP will.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,578
Default I'd rather have the oil


"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
REP. ALAN GRAYSON (D-FL) wants Repubs sent to prison for supporting
drilling but he can start with me (although I am not repub) and I'll
make him look as foolish as he is.
MY beaches (Yes MINE as I am a 5th gen Florida native) used to be
pristine and clear of condos and I could walk them without some idjit
yankee telling me it belongs to him. There used to be salt marshes
that produced crabs and redfish but they were filled for development
spurred by tourism. I used to be able to walk into the sand dunes to
a sheltered spot and build a fire and see the glory of the night sky,
now the dunes were levelled for hotels and the night sky is nothing
but neon. Given a choice between tar balls and tourism, there is no
doubt, I'd take the tar balls. Oil jobs pay well, tourism pays
minimum wage. Once condos foul the beaches, it is effectively forever
whereas the oil will be gone soon enough. I'd go so far as to believe
that tourists with their suntan grease have probably put more oil in
MY beach sand than BP will.


The oil won't "soon be gone." The Exxon disaster is still going on you
idiot.

  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2010
Posts: 58
Default I'd rather have the oil

On 6/4/2010 4:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
REP. ALAN GRAYSON (D-FL) wants Repubs sent to prison for supporting
drilling but he can start with me (although I am not repub) and I'll
make him look as foolish as he is.
MY beaches (Yes MINE as I am a 5th gen Florida native) used to be
pristine and clear of condos and I could walk them without some idjit
yankee telling me it belongs to him. There used to be salt marshes
that produced crabs and redfish but they were filled for development
spurred by tourism. I used to be able to walk into the sand dunes to
a sheltered spot and build a fire and see the glory of the night sky,
now the dunes were levelled for hotels and the night sky is nothing
but neon. Given a choice between tar balls and tourism, there is no
doubt, I'd take the tar balls. Oil jobs pay well, tourism pays
minimum wage. Once condos foul the beaches, it is effectively forever
whereas the oil will be gone soon enough. I'd go so far as to believe
that tourists with their suntan grease have probably put more oil in
MY beach sand than BP will.


The oil won't "soon be gone." The Exxon disaster is still going on you
idiot.

Why the idiot comment? Does it make you feel sexy?
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default I'd rather have the oil

On 04/06/2010 4:19 PM, Wiley wrote:
On 6/4/2010 4:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
REP. ALAN GRAYSON (D-FL) wants Repubs sent to prison for supporting
drilling but he can start with me (although I am not repub) and I'll
make him look as foolish as he is.
MY beaches (Yes MINE as I am a 5th gen Florida native) used to be
pristine and clear of condos and I could walk them without some idjit
yankee telling me it belongs to him. There used to be salt marshes
that produced crabs and redfish but they were filled for development
spurred by tourism. I used to be able to walk into the sand dunes to
a sheltered spot and build a fire and see the glory of the night sky,
now the dunes were levelled for hotels and the night sky is nothing
but neon. Given a choice between tar balls and tourism, there is no
doubt, I'd take the tar balls. Oil jobs pay well, tourism pays
minimum wage. Once condos foul the beaches, it is effectively forever
whereas the oil will be gone soon enough. I'd go so far as to believe
that tourists with their suntan grease have probably put more oil in
MY beach sand than BP will.


The oil won't "soon be gone." The Exxon disaster is still going on you
idiot.

Why the idiot comment? Does it make you feel sexy?


Nothing could make de-fumer sexy.

--
This depression is about liberal magots running debt liberally.
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,578
Default I'd rather have the oil


"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 04/06/2010 4:19 PM, Wiley wrote:
On 6/4/2010 4:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
REP. ALAN GRAYSON (D-FL) wants Repubs sent to prison for supporting
drilling but he can start with me (although I am not repub) and I'll
make him look as foolish as he is.
MY beaches (Yes MINE as I am a 5th gen Florida native) used to be
pristine and clear of condos and I could walk them without some idjit
yankee telling me it belongs to him. There used to be salt marshes
that produced crabs and redfish but they were filled for development
spurred by tourism. I used to be able to walk into the sand dunes to
a sheltered spot and build a fire and see the glory of the night sky,
now the dunes were levelled for hotels and the night sky is nothing
but neon. Given a choice between tar balls and tourism, there is no
doubt, I'd take the tar balls. Oil jobs pay well, tourism pays
minimum wage. Once condos foul the beaches, it is effectively forever
whereas the oil will be gone soon enough. I'd go so far as to believe
that tourists with their suntan grease have probably put more oil in
MY beach sand than BP will.

The oil won't "soon be gone." The Exxon disaster is still going on you
idiot.

Why the idiot comment? Does it make you feel sexy?


Nothing could make de-fumer sexy.

--
This depression is about liberal magots running debt liberally.


Your stupidity isn't sexy, btw.




  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default I'd rather have the oil

On 04/06/2010 5:52 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 04/06/2010 4:19 PM, Wiley wrote:
On 6/4/2010 4:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...

REP. ALAN GRAYSON (D-FL) wants Repubs sent to prison for supporting
drilling but he can start with me (although I am not repub) and I'll
make him look as foolish as he is.
MY beaches (Yes MINE as I am a 5th gen Florida native) used to be
pristine and clear of condos and I could walk them without some idjit
yankee telling me it belongs to him. There used to be salt marshes
that produced crabs and redfish but they were filled for development
spurred by tourism. I used to be able to walk into the sand dunes to
a sheltered spot and build a fire and see the glory of the night sky,
now the dunes were levelled for hotels and the night sky is nothing
but neon. Given a choice between tar balls and tourism, there is no
doubt, I'd take the tar balls. Oil jobs pay well, tourism pays
minimum wage. Once condos foul the beaches, it is effectively forever
whereas the oil will be gone soon enough. I'd go so far as to believe
that tourists with their suntan grease have probably put more oil in
MY beach sand than BP will.

The oil won't "soon be gone." The Exxon disaster is still going on you
idiot.
Why the idiot comment? Does it make you feel sexy?


Nothing could make de-fumer sexy.

--
This depression is about liberal magots running debt liberally.


Your stupidity isn't sexy, btw.


Good, the last thing I want is for you to think I am sexy. Not into whales.


--
This depression is about liberal magots running debt liberally.
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,578
Default I'd rather have the oil


"Wiley" wrote in message
...
On 6/4/2010 4:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
REP. ALAN GRAYSON (D-FL) wants Repubs sent to prison for supporting
drilling but he can start with me (although I am not repub) and I'll
make him look as foolish as he is.
MY beaches (Yes MINE as I am a 5th gen Florida native) used to be
pristine and clear of condos and I could walk them without some idjit
yankee telling me it belongs to him. There used to be salt marshes
that produced crabs and redfish but they were filled for development
spurred by tourism. I used to be able to walk into the sand dunes to
a sheltered spot and build a fire and see the glory of the night sky,
now the dunes were levelled for hotels and the night sky is nothing
but neon. Given a choice between tar balls and tourism, there is no
doubt, I'd take the tar balls. Oil jobs pay well, tourism pays
minimum wage. Once condos foul the beaches, it is effectively forever
whereas the oil will be gone soon enough. I'd go so far as to believe
that tourists with their suntan grease have probably put more oil in
MY beach sand than BP will.


The oil won't "soon be gone." The Exxon disaster is still going on you
idiot.

Why the idiot comment? Does it make you feel sexy?


Because he's clearly an idiot. Does it make you feel like a man when you
spoof your id?


  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,106
Default I'd rather have the oil

On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 13:12:29 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Once condos foul the beaches, it is effectively forever
whereas the oil will be gone soon enough. I'd go so far as to believe
that tourists with their suntan grease have probably put more oil in
MY beach sand than BP will.


doesnt know much about oil, does he?

and 12,000 people are out of work. is he gonna pay for them?

  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default I'd rather have the oil

On 04/06/2010 3:51 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 13:12:29 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Once condos foul the beaches, it is effectively forever
whereas the oil will be gone soon enough. I'd go so far as to believe
that tourists with their suntan grease have probably put more oil in
MY beach sand than BP will.


doesnt know much about oil, does he?

and 12,000 people are out of work. is he gonna pay for them?



Obama has some minimum wage jobs for them.

--
This depression is about liberal magots running debt liberally.
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,106
Default I'd rather have the oil

On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:34:34 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 04/06/2010 3:51 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 13:12:29 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Once condos foul the beaches, it is effectively forever
whereas the oil will be gone soon enough. I'd go so far as to believe
that tourists with their suntan grease have probably put more oil in
MY beach sand than BP will.


doesnt know much about oil, does he?

and 12,000 people are out of work. is he gonna pay for them?



Obama has some minimum wage jobs for them.


BP destroys the ecosystem

puts tens of thousands of people out of work

and the right winger blames the unemployed because, after all, it was
an oil company that did it.

and oil companies are never wrong



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017