![]() |
head question
OK basic question: boat has a porta potty (actually more than a PP;
it's hard installed in the boat). no holding tank apart from the 3 gallon tank on the potty. it has a drain port for connecting to god knows where. it was connected to a line allowing direct dumping to the sea....but, since i don't like my buddies on the gold side of the USCG busting me, i disconnected it. question: can i hook a sanitary line directly from the output of the potty to the pump out connection, and pump out the potty's holding tank? will a pump out damage the potty, or, god forbid, blow its contents all over the head? a buddy of mine did that once on his boat...got the valving wrong and coated his head. NOT a pleasant thought.... thanks everyone (and where's peggy when you need her?) |
head question
On May 31, 6:41*pm, bpuharic wrote:
OK basic question: boat has a porta potty (actually more than a PP; it's hard installed in the boat). *no holding tank apart from the 3 gallon tank on the potty. *it has a drain port for connecting to god knows where. *it was connected to a line allowing direct dumping to the sea....but, since i don't like my buddies on the gold side of the USCG busting me, i disconnected it. question: can i hook a sanitary line directly from the output of the potty to the pump out connection, and pump out the potty's holding tank? * will a pump out damage the potty, or, god forbid, blow its contents all over the *head? *a buddy of mine did that once on his boat...got the valving wrong and coated his head. NOT a pleasant thought.... thanks everyone (and where's peggy when you need her?) I'm guessing a one way valve would prevent a backlash. You should be able to adapt it for pump out. It'll take some dismantling, and rigging the piping, as well as drilling the deck to accept the plug. |
head question
On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:59:10 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"
wrote: On May 31, 6:41*pm, bpuharic wrote: OK basic question: boat has a porta potty (actually more than a PP; it's hard installed in the boat). *no holding tank apart from the 3 gallon tank on the potty. *it has a drain port for connecting to god knows where. *it was connected to a line allowing direct dumping to the sea....but, since i don't like my buddies on the gold side of the USCG busting me, i disconnected it. question: can i hook a sanitary line directly from the output of the potty to the pump out connection, and pump out the potty's holding tank? * will a pump out damage the potty, or, god forbid, blow its contents all over the *head? *a buddy of mine did that once on his boat...got the valving wrong and coated his head. NOT a pleasant thought.... thanks everyone (and where's peggy when you need her?) I'm guessing a one way valve would prevent a backlash. You should be able to adapt it for pump out. It'll take some dismantling, and rigging the piping, as well as drilling the deck to accept the plug. it looks like everything is in place, including the connection to the toilet. the only thing missing is the sanitary line from the head to the pump out connection on the deck. i just want to make sure i don't blow up the toilet when i flush it out. |
head question
On 5/31/2010 10:07 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:59:10 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c" wrote: On May 31, 6:41 pm, wrote: OK basic question: boat has a porta potty (actually more than a PP; it's hard installed in the boat). no holding tank apart from the 3 gallon tank on the potty. it has a drain port for connecting to god knows where. it was connected to a line allowing direct dumping to the sea....but, since i don't like my buddies on the gold side of the USCG busting me, i disconnected it. question: can i hook a sanitary line directly from the output of the potty to the pump out connection, and pump out the potty's holding tank? will a pump out damage the potty, or, god forbid, blow its contents all over the head? a buddy of mine did that once on his boat...got the valving wrong and coated his head. NOT a pleasant thought.... thanks everyone (and where's peggy when you need her?) I'm guessing a one way valve would prevent a backlash. You should be able to adapt it for pump out. It'll take some dismantling, and rigging the piping, as well as drilling the deck to accept the plug. it looks like everything is in place, including the connection to the toilet. the only thing missing is the sanitary line from the head to the pump out connection on the deck. i just want to make sure i don't blow up the toilet when i flush it out. You worry too much. Go for it. What's the worst that can happen? |
head question
On Mon, 31 May 2010 22:33:20 -0400, Le Moose
wrote: On 5/31/2010 10:07 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:59:10 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c" wrote: it looks like everything is in place, including the connection to the toilet. the only thing missing is the sanitary line from the head to the pump out connection on the deck. i just want to make sure i don't blow up the toilet when i flush it out. You worry too much. Go for it. What's the worst that can happen? the head could blow up and my wife, well, she would too! |
head question
On 5/31/2010 10:41 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2010 22:33:20 -0400, Le wrote: On 5/31/2010 10:07 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:59:10 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c" wrote: it looks like everything is in place, including the connection to the toilet. the only thing missing is the sanitary line from the head to the pump out connection on the deck. i just want to make sure i don't blow up the toilet when i flush it out. You worry too much. Go for it. What's the worst that can happen? the head could blow up and my wife, well, she would too! Blow up, you say? |
head question
|
head question
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 07:38:09 -0400, Le Moose
wrote: On 5/31/2010 10:41 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 22:33:20 -0400, Le wrote: On 5/31/2010 10:07 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:59:10 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c" wrote: it looks like everything is in place, including the connection to the toilet. the only thing missing is the sanitary line from the head to the pump out connection on the deck. i just want to make sure i don't blow up the toilet when i flush it out. You worry too much. Go for it. What's the worst that can happen? the head could blow up and my wife, well, she would too! Blow up, you say? yeah. you suck a vacuum on a container not designed for it...and then backfill it with water...the results would be unpleasant |
head question
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:05:13 -0400, hk wrote:
In article , says... OK basic question: boat has a porta potty (actually more than a PP; it's hard installed in the boat). no holding tank apart from the 3 gallon tank on the potty. it has a drain port for connecting to god knows where. it was connected to a line allowing direct dumping to the sea....but, since i don't like my buddies on the gold side of the USCG busting me, i disconnected it. question: can i hook a sanitary line directly from the output of the potty to the pump out connection, and pump out the potty's holding tank? will a pump out damage the potty, or, god forbid, blow its contents all over the head? a buddy of mine did that once on his boat...got the valving wrong and coated his head. NOT a pleasant thought.... thanks everyone (and where's peggy when you need her?) I ran Peggy out of here. She caught me in most of my lies, and she actually knew a lot about boats and made me look bad. now, if you're gonna parody hk, try to do it with class, OK? |
head question
On 6/1/2010 5:44 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 07:38:09 -0400, Le wrote: On 5/31/2010 10:41 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 22:33:20 -0400, Le wrote: On 5/31/2010 10:07 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:59:10 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c" wrote: it looks like everything is in place, including the connection to the toilet. the only thing missing is the sanitary line from the head to the pump out connection on the deck. i just want to make sure i don't blow up the toilet when i flush it out. You worry too much. Go for it. What's the worst that can happen? the head could blow up and my wife, well, she would too! Blow up, you say? yeah. you suck a vacuum on a container not designed for it...and then backfill it with water...the results would be unpleasant If you plan to do that, you deserve to have it blow up in your face. Is there a working vent in the holding tank? If you play your cards right, the only vacuum applied to your system will be in the suction hose that connects to the deck plate. I'm not sure what you mean by backfill. You don't mean rinse, do you? |
head question
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:06:05 -0400, Le Moose
wrote: On 6/1/2010 5:44 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 07:38:09 -0400, Le wrote: On 5/31/2010 10:41 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 22:33:20 -0400, Le wrote: On 5/31/2010 10:07 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:59:10 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c" wrote: it looks like everything is in place, including the connection to the toilet. the only thing missing is the sanitary line from the head to the pump out connection on the deck. i just want to make sure i don't blow up the toilet when i flush it out. You worry too much. Go for it. What's the worst that can happen? the head could blow up and my wife, well, she would too! Blow up, you say? yeah. you suck a vacuum on a container not designed for it...and then backfill it with water...the results would be unpleasant If you plan to do that, you deserve to have it blow up in your face. you ARE aware a pump out station applies a vacuum, right? Is there a working vent in the holding tank? If you play your cards right, the only vacuum applied to your system will be in the suction hose that connects to the deck plate. I'm not sure what you mean by backfill. You don't mean rinse, do you? yep. the rinse...if it's too forcefull it could overpressurize the system and either damage it or overflow the tank. |
head question
On 6/1/2010 6:08 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:06:05 -0400, Le wrote: On 6/1/2010 5:44 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 07:38:09 -0400, Le wrote: On 5/31/2010 10:41 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 22:33:20 -0400, Le wrote: On 5/31/2010 10:07 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:59:10 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c" wrote: it looks like everything is in place, including the connection to the toilet. the only thing missing is the sanitary line from the head to the pump out connection on the deck. i just want to make sure i don't blow up the toilet when i flush it out. You worry too much. Go for it. What's the worst that can happen? the head could blow up and my wife, well, she would too! Blow up, you say? yeah. you suck a vacuum on a container not designed for it...and then backfill it with water...the results would be unpleasant If you plan to do that, you deserve to have it blow up in your face. you ARE aware a pump out station applies a vacuum, right? Is there a working vent in the holding tank? If you play your cards right, the only vacuum applied to your system will be in the suction hose that connects to the deck plate. I'm not sure what you mean by backfill. You don't mean rinse, do you? yep. the rinse...if it's too forcefull it could overpressurize the system and either damage it or overflow the tank. Of course the honey pot applies vacuum. How else is it going to "suck" the **** out of your boat. That's one reason you vent your holding tank. The chore of rinsing your holding tank should be given to someone with enough common sense to do it without damaging anything. May I suggest your wife? |
head question
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 07:38:09 -0400, Le Moose wrote: On 5/31/2010 10:41 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 22:33:20 -0400, Le wrote: On 5/31/2010 10:07 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:59:10 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c" wrote: it looks like everything is in place, including the connection to the toilet. the only thing missing is the sanitary line from the head to the pump out connection on the deck. i just want to make sure i don't blow up the toilet when i flush it out. You worry too much. Go for it. What's the worst that can happen? the head could blow up and my wife, well, she would too! Blow up, you say? yeah. you suck a vacuum on a container not designed for it...and then backfill it with water...the results would be unpleasant I had a small MSD on my trailerable Sandpiper 565. It had a deck cleanout and a vent. i never did use it but it was typical of what was installed on boats in central Canada in the 80's & 90's. Here on the coast we are still allowed to discharge directly to the sea. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...d/Hpim0171.jpg |
head question
On 6/1/2010 6:33 PM, YukonBound wrote:
Here on the coast we are still allowed to discharge directly to the sea. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...d/Hpim0171.jpg Of course you are allowed. It must be delightful swimming in Nova Scotia watching turds floating by. You don't swim with your mouth open, do you? |
head question
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:30:40 -0400, Le Moose
wrote: On 6/1/2010 6:08 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:06:05 -0400, Le wrote: yep. the rinse...if it's too forcefull it could overpressurize the system and either damage it or overflow the tank. Of course the honey pot applies vacuum. How else is it going to "suck" the **** out of your boat. That's one reason you vent your holding tank. The chore of rinsing your holding tank should be given to someone with enough common sense to do it without damaging anything. May I suggest your wife? i see explaining the issue has taxed your mental abilities. if discussing **** confuses you, then i suggest you vote republican. they can use the help. |
head question
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:33:38 -0300, "YukonBound"
wrote: I had a small MSD on my trailerable Sandpiper 565. It had a deck cleanout and a vent. i never did use it but it was typical of what was installed on boats in central Canada in the 80's & 90's. Here on the coast we are still allowed to discharge directly to the sea. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...d/Hpim0171.jpg that's kind of what the unit looks like. don't know if it's made to be flushed out at a pump out or not so i'll have to do some reading up. but it was connected to the sea connection on the boat...it isn't any longer! |
head question
On 6/1/2010 6:46 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:30:40 -0400, Le wrote: On 6/1/2010 6:08 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:06:05 -0400, Le wrote: yep. the rinse...if it's too forcefull it could overpressurize the system and either damage it or overflow the tank. Of course the honey pot applies vacuum. How else is it going to "suck" the **** out of your boat. That's one reason you vent your holding tank. The chore of rinsing your holding tank should be given to someone with enough common sense to do it without damaging anything. May I suggest your wife? i see explaining the issue has taxed your mental abilities. if discussing **** confuses you, then i suggest you vote republican. they can use the help. Actually not taxing at all. And you seem to be the one who is confused about how to safely move **** from your boat to a honey pot without damaging your boat. Perhaps you could get Obie to explain it to you. He's quite the **** slinger. If you still can't figure it out, seek help from an engineer, or pay a plumber to check it out for you. |
head question
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:57:29 -0400, Le Moose
wrote: On 6/1/2010 6:46 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:30:40 -0400, Le wrote: On 6/1/2010 6:08 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:06:05 -0400, Le wrote: yep. the rinse...if it's too forcefull it could overpressurize the system and either damage it or overflow the tank. Of course the honey pot applies vacuum. How else is it going to "suck" the **** out of your boat. That's one reason you vent your holding tank. The chore of rinsing your holding tank should be given to someone with enough common sense to do it without damaging anything. May I suggest your wife? i see explaining the issue has taxed your mental abilities. if discussing **** confuses you, then i suggest you vote republican. they can use the help. Actually not taxing at all. And you seem to be the one who is confused about how to safely move **** from your boat to a honey pot without damaging your boat. ah, yes. that's why i asked the question. and i know enough to ask the question. you right wingers think you know all the answers which is why you end up covered in ****. Perhaps you could get Obie to explain it to you. He's quite the **** slinger. If you still can't figure it out, seek help from an engineer, or pay a plumber to check it out for you. gee. i'm an engineer. which is why i asked the question. now, go. go back to rush. tell him why your fingers are stained brown. |
head question
On 6/1/2010 6:59 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:57:29 -0400, Le wrote: On 6/1/2010 6:46 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:30:40 -0400, Le wrote: On 6/1/2010 6:08 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:06:05 -0400, Le wrote: yep. the rinse...if it's too forcefull it could overpressurize the system and either damage it or overflow the tank. Of course the honey pot applies vacuum. How else is it going to "suck" the **** out of your boat. That's one reason you vent your holding tank. The chore of rinsing your holding tank should be given to someone with enough common sense to do it without damaging anything. May I suggest your wife? i see explaining the issue has taxed your mental abilities. if discussing **** confuses you, then i suggest you vote republican. they can use the help. Actually not taxing at all. And you seem to be the one who is confused about how to safely move **** from your boat to a honey pot without damaging your boat. ah, yes. that's why i asked the question. and i know enough to ask the question. you right wingers think you know all the answers which is why you end up covered in ****. Perhaps you could get Obie to explain it to you. He's quite the **** slinger. If you still can't figure it out, seek help from an engineer, or pay a plumber to check it out for you. gee. i'm an engineer. which is why i asked the question. now, go. go back to rush. tell him why your fingers are stained brown. What kind of engineer are you? |
head question
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:00:47 -0400, Le Moose
wrote: On 6/1/2010 6:59 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:57:29 -0400, Le wrote: ah, yes. that's why i asked the question. and i know enough to ask the question. you right wingers think you know all the answers which is why you end up covered in ****. Perhaps you could get Obie to explain it to you. He's quite the **** slinger. If you still can't figure it out, seek help from an engineer, or pay a plumber to check it out for you. gee. i'm an engineer. which is why i asked the question. now, go. go back to rush. tell him why your fingers are stained brown. What kind of engineer are you? one smart enough to know he doesn't know everything. |
head question
On 6/1/2010 7:02 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:00:47 -0400, Le wrote: On 6/1/2010 6:59 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:57:29 -0400, Le wrote: ah, yes. that's why i asked the question. and i know enough to ask the question. you right wingers think you know all the answers which is why you end up covered in ****. Perhaps you could get Obie to explain it to you. He's quite the **** slinger. If you still can't figure it out, seek help from an engineer, or pay a plumber to check it out for you. gee. i'm an engineer. which is why i asked the question. now, go. go back to rush. tell him why your fingers are stained brown. What kind of engineer are you? one smart enough to know he doesn't know everything. Let me rephrase the question. Would your wife consider you "handy around the house", or would she call you a "klutz"? |
head question
On 6/1/10 6:59 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:57:29 -0400, Le wrote: On 6/1/2010 6:46 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:30:40 -0400, Le wrote: On 6/1/2010 6:08 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:06:05 -0400, Le wrote: yep. the rinse...if it's too forcefull it could overpressurize the system and either damage it or overflow the tank. Of course the honey pot applies vacuum. How else is it going to "suck" the **** out of your boat. That's one reason you vent your holding tank. The chore of rinsing your holding tank should be given to someone with enough common sense to do it without damaging anything. May I suggest your wife? i see explaining the issue has taxed your mental abilities. if discussing **** confuses you, then i suggest you vote republican. they can use the help. Actually not taxing at all. And you seem to be the one who is confused about how to safely move **** from your boat to a honey pot without damaging your boat. ah, yes. that's why i asked the question. and i know enough to ask the question. you right wingers think you know all the answers which is why you end up covered in ****. Perhaps you could get Obie to explain it to you. He's quite the **** slinger. If you still can't figure it out, seek help from an engineer, or pay a plumber to check it out for you. gee. i'm an engineer. which is why i asked the question. now, go. go back to rush. tell him why your fingers are stained brown. Moose bent over and picked up soap in the navy showers. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
head question
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:20:23 -0400, Le Moose
wrote: On 6/1/2010 7:02 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:00:47 -0400, Le wrote: What kind of engineer are you? one smart enough to know he doesn't know everything. Let me rephrase the question. Would your wife consider you "handy around the house", or would she call you a "klutz"? i'm smart enough to know my limiitations. |
head question
On 6/1/2010 7:32 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:20:23 -0400, Le wrote: On 6/1/2010 7:02 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:00:47 -0400, Le wrote: What kind of engineer are you? one smart enough to know he doesn't know everything. Let me rephrase the question. Would your wife consider you "handy around the house", or would she call you a "klutz"? i'm smart enough to know my limiitations. Fair enough. You should have a knowledgeable person look over your situation with the head and set it up for you or advise you on what to do. |
head question
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:24:45 -0400, Le Moose
wrote: On 6/1/2010 7:32 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:20:23 -0400, Le wrote: On 6/1/2010 7:02 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:00:47 -0400, Le wrote: What kind of engineer are you? one smart enough to know he doesn't know everything. Let me rephrase the question. Would your wife consider you "handy around the house", or would she call you a "klutz"? i'm smart enough to know my limiitations. Fair enough. You should have a knowledgeable person look over your situation with the head and set it up for you or advise you on what to do. good advice...probably what i'll do |
head question
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:05:13 -0400, hk wrote: In article , says... OK basic question: boat has a porta potty (actually more than a PP; it's hard installed in the boat). no holding tank apart from the 3 gallon tank on the potty. it has a drain port for connecting to god knows where. it was connected to a line allowing direct dumping to the sea....but, since i don't like my buddies on the gold side of the USCG busting me, i disconnected it. question: can i hook a sanitary line directly from the output of the potty to the pump out connection, and pump out the potty's holding tank? will a pump out damage the potty, or, god forbid, blow its contents all over the head? a buddy of mine did that once on his boat...got the valving wrong and coated his head. NOT a pleasant thought.... thanks everyone (and where's peggy when you need her?) I ran Peggy out of here. She caught me in most of my lies, and she actually knew a lot about boats and made me look bad. now, if you're gonna parody hk, try to do it with class, OK? Class for the classless? |
head question
In article ,
says... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 07:38:09 -0400, Le Moose wrote: On 5/31/2010 10:41 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 22:33:20 -0400, Le wrote: On 5/31/2010 10:07 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:59:10 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c" wrote: it looks like everything is in place, including the connection to the toilet. the only thing missing is the sanitary line from the head to the pump out connection on the deck. i just want to make sure i don't blow up the toilet when i flush it out. You worry too much. Go for it. What's the worst that can happen? the head could blow up and my wife, well, she would too! Blow up, you say? yeah. you suck a vacuum on a container not designed for it...and then backfill it with water...the results would be unpleasant I had a small MSD on my trailerable Sandpiper 565. It had a deck cleanout and a vent. i never did use it but it was typical of what was installed on boats in central Canada in the 80's & 90's. Here on the coast we are still allowed to discharge directly to the sea. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...d/Hpim0171.jpg I like it when you talk about "head" little buddy. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com