On 24/05/2010 12:38 AM, jps wrote:
at the same rate as city kids do..

CHICAGO — Children in the most rural areas of the United States are as
likely to die by gunshot as kids in the biggest cities, a new analysis
of nearly 24,000 deaths finds.

Not surprisingly, deaths involving firearms are more common among city
youth. But gun suicides and accidental fatal shootings level the
sco They are more common among rural kids.

"This debunks the myth that firearm death is a big-city problem," said
lead author Dr. Michael Nance of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
"This is everybody's problem."

The findings were published Monday in the journal Pediatrics.

The researchers analyzed data on nearly 24,000 gun-related deaths
among children 19 and younger from 1999 through 2006. That included
about 15,000 homicides, about 7,000 suicides and about 1,400
accidental shootings for the eight-year period.

The researchers sorted them by county then compared the gun-death
rates for the most urban counties — those with populations of 1
million or more, like Dallas County in Texas — and the most rural
counties — the ones far from cities or with fewer than 2,500 people,
like Powder River County in Montana. They found essentially the same
rate, about 4 deaths per 100,000 children.

The stats are meaningless by themselves.

More people die from autos, so lets ban them too. That is the mentality
of this.

For guns, one also has to examine, like autos, the need. How many times
was a gun used properly to avoid problems? An essential statistic to
make any kind of judgement.

Rural kids likely have lower accidents as in a rural community you tend
to be more responsible and educated on guns. The statists here are
tainted as in a rural community the chances of being exposed and access
to firearms would be much higher than a city. Thus, er hour of
exposure, rural kids are more responsible and better understand the
proper use. They are also more likely to get Dad to take them out for a
shoot and know where the safety is.

--
Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
news
On 24/05/2010 12:38 AM, jps wrote:
at the same rate as city kids do..

CHICAGO — Children in the most rural areas of the United States are as
likely to die by gunshot as kids in the biggest cities, a new analysis
of nearly 24,000 deaths finds.

Not surprisingly, deaths involving firearms are more common among city
youth. But gun suicides and accidental fatal shootings level the
sco They are more common among rural kids.

"This debunks the myth that firearm death is a big-city problem," said
lead author Dr. Michael Nance of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
"This is everybody's problem."

The findings were published Monday in the journal Pediatrics.

The researchers analyzed data on nearly 24,000 gun-related deaths
among children 19 and younger from 1999 through 2006. That included
about 15,000 homicides, about 7,000 suicides and about 1,400
accidental shootings for the eight-year period.

The researchers sorted them by county then compared the gun-death
rates for the most urban counties — those with populations of 1
million or more, like Dallas County in Texas — and the most rural
counties — the ones far from cities or with fewer than 2,500 people,
like Powder River County in Montana. They found essentially the same
rate, about 4 deaths per 100,000 children.

The stats are meaningless by themselves.

More people die from autos, so lets ban them too. That is the mentality
of this.

For guns, one also has to examine, like autos, the need. How many times
was a gun used properly to avoid problems? An essential statistic to make
any kind of judgement.

Rural kids likely have lower accidents as in a rural community you tend to
be more responsible and educated on guns. The statists here are tainted
as in a rural community the chances of being exposed and access to
firearms would be much higher than a city. Thus, er hour of exposure,
rural kids are more responsible and better understand the proper use.
They are also more likely to get Dad to take them out for a shoot and know
where the safety is.

--
Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create
wealth.


If we could only bad stupid people like yourself....

On 5/24/2010 3:26 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

If we could only bad stupid people like yourself....


We tried to bad you but you wouldn't cooperate. What makes you think it
would work on other stupid people?

"moose" wrote in message
...
On 5/24/2010 3:26 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

If we could only bad stupid people like yourself....


We tried to bad you but you wouldn't cooperate. What makes you think it
would work on other stupid people?


Feel free to continue to point out typos. Clearly, you have nothing else you
can do or say.

On 5/24/2010 3:41 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"moose" wrote in message
...
On 5/24/2010 3:26 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

If we could only bad stupid people like yourself....


We tried to bad you but you wouldn't cooperate. What makes you think
it would work on other stupid people?


Feel free to continue to point out typos. Clearly, you have nothing else
you can do or say.

Careful who you offer free feels to.

On 24/05/2010 1:41 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"moose" wrote in message
...
On 5/24/2010 3:26 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

If we could only bad stupid people like yourself....


We tried to bad you but you wouldn't cooperate. What makes you think
it would work on other stupid people?


Feel free to continue to point out typos. Clearly, you have nothing else
you can do or say.

Hey, you either have nothing to say or are so screwed up in every post
you make. We can't help it but laugh.

--
Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth.

In article ,
says...

"moose" wrote in message
...
On 5/24/2010 3:26 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

If we could only bad stupid people like yourself....


We tried to bad you but you wouldn't cooperate. What makes you think it
would work on other stupid people?


Feel free to continue to point out typos. Clearly, you have nothing else you
can do or say.

No! That's MY job. It makes me look like I actually know something
besides being a desk jockey for Crown Corporation.

"moose" wrote in message
...
On 5/24/2010 3:41 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"moose" wrote in message
...
On 5/24/2010 3:26 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

If we could only bad stupid people like yourself....


We tried to bad you but you wouldn't cooperate. What makes you think
it would work on other stupid people?


Feel free to continue to point out typos. Clearly, you have nothing else
you can do or say.

Careful who you offer free feels to.

You're such a brainiac!

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 24/05/2010 1:41 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"moose" wrote in message
...
On 5/24/2010 3:26 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

If we could only bad stupid people like yourself....


We tried to bad you but you wouldn't cooperate. What makes you think
it would work on other stupid people?


Feel free to continue to point out typos. Clearly, you have nothing else
you can do or say.

Hey, you either have nothing to say or are so screwed up in every post you
make. We can't help it but laugh.

--
Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create
wealth.

All you're doing is crying. You're such a he-man.

On Mon, 24 May 2010 10:47:12 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



The stats are meaningless by themselves.

More people die from autos, so lets ban them too. That is the mentality
of this.

cars have a use. guns do not.


For guns, one also has to examine, like autos, the need. How many times
was a gun used properly to avoid problems?

something like 300 people used guns legitimately to defend themselves
last year.

11,000 people were murdered by guns last year. so about 97 murder
victims to every legit use of self defense