Another boating hazard
 

On 5/8/2010 11:08 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On May 8, 9:40 am, wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote:



That's because there is no answer, moron.

Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could
just make a phone call, without any identification, and get
information like that, how many times do you think there would be
lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's
plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied.
That's the answer.

A lot of data is in the public record. You could learn a lot about Harry
if you knew where to look. A lot of it is archived here on rec.boats.
Name, address, phone numbers, so called wife's real name. Some of it is
in Calvert County records, but not under Harry's name. Some of it can be
goggled. Can't seem to find any public records in Georgia though.

Another boating hazard
 

On 5/8/10 11:32 AM, moose wrote:
On 5/8/2010 11:08 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On May 8, 9:40 am, wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote:



That's because there is no answer, moron.

Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could
just make a phone call, without any identification, and get
information like that, how many times do you think there would be
lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's
plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied.
That's the answer.

A lot of data is in the public record. You could learn a lot about Harry
if you knew where to look. A lot of it is archived here on rec.boats.
Name, address, phone numbers, so called wife's real name. Some of it is
in Calvert County records, but not under Harry's name. Some of it can be
goggled. Can't seem to find any public records in Georgia though.


Stalking again, flajim?

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Another boating hazard
 

On 5/8/2010 11:34 AM, hk wrote:
On 5/8/10 11:32 AM, moose wrote:
On 5/8/2010 11:08 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On May 8, 9:40 am, wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote:



That's because there is no answer, moron.

Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another
name.

Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could
just make a phone call, without any identification, and get
information like that, how many times do you think there would be
lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's
plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied.
That's the answer.

A lot of data is in the public record. You could learn a lot about Harry
if you knew where to look. A lot of it is archived here on rec.boats.
Name, address, phone numbers, so called wife's real name. Some of it is
in Calvert County records, but not under Harry's name. Some of it can be
goggled. Can't seem to find any public records in Georgia though.


Stalking again, flajim?

Just stating some facts.
Would you mind telling us which state and city your marriage license and
certificate were issued in. We'd like to give you opportunity to prove
that you are married and to whom.

Another boating hazard
 

In article ,
says...

On 5/8/10 11:08 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On May 8, 9:40 am, wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote:



That's because there is no answer, moron.

Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could
just make a phone call, without any identification, and get
information like that, how many times do you think there would be
lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's
plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied.
That's the answer.


I would guess the answer is in your own statement up there,
DumFochLoogy. Who says the calls were made without identification? I

Whatever happend to Jim from Ohio?

didn't say that. Who says the offices of well-known criminal defense
lawyers don't have "connections" with court clerks, magistrates, and
"wants and warrants" desks? I didn't say that. One of your many problems
is that your world of real-life knowledge is...limited, as is your
intellect.

What's the matter pussy boy, you can't stand up for yourself?

Another boating hazard
 

On 5/8/10 11:50 AM, BAR wrote:
In articledbWdnRZtu_lHHnjWnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
says...

On 5/8/10 11:08 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On May 8, 9:40 am, wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote:



That's because there is no answer, moron.

Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could
just make a phone call, without any identification, and get
information like that, how many times do you think there would be
lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's
plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied.
That's the answer.


I would guess the answer is in your own statement up there,
DumFochLoogy. Who says the calls were made without identification? I

Whatever happend to Jim from Ohio?

didn't say that. Who says the offices of well-known criminal defense
lawyers don't have "connections" with court clerks, magistrates, and
"wants and warrants" desks? I didn't say that. One of your many problems
is that your world of real-life knowledge is...limited, as is your
intellect.

What's the matter pussy boy, you can't stand up for yourself?





Boatless Bert...yawn. Why are you not out golfing with your "planning
his next surgery" buddy, John "The Racist" Herring?

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Another boating hazard
 

On 5/8/10 11:41 AM, moose wrote:
On 5/8/2010 11:34 AM, hk wrote:
On 5/8/10 11:32 AM, moose wrote:
On 5/8/2010 11:08 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On May 8, 9:40 am, wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote:



That's because there is no answer, moron.

Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another
name.

Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could
just make a phone call, without any identification, and get
information like that, how many times do you think there would be
lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's
plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied.
That's the answer.

A lot of data is in the public record. You could learn a lot about Harry
if you knew where to look. A lot of it is archived here on rec.boats.
Name, address, phone numbers, so called wife's real name. Some of it is
in Calvert County records, but not under Harry's name. Some of it can be
goggled. Can't seem to find any public records in Georgia though.


Stalking again, flajim?

Just stating some facts.
Would you mind telling us which state and city your marriage license and
certificate were issued in. We'd like to give you opportunity to prove
that you are married and to whom.

Ireland.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Another boating hazard
 

In article ,
says...

On 5/8/10 11:32 AM, moose wrote:
On 5/8/2010 11:08 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On May 8, 9:40 am, wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote:



That's because there is no answer, moron.

Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could
just make a phone call, without any identification, and get
information like that, how many times do you think there would be
lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's
plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied.
That's the answer.

A lot of data is in the public record. You could learn a lot about Harry
if you knew where to look. A lot of it is archived here on rec.boats.
Name, address, phone numbers, so called wife's real name. Some of it is
in Calvert County records, but not under Harry's name. Some of it can be
goggled. Can't seem to find any public records in Georgia though.


Stalking again, flajim?

Funny how you have "stalked" yourself by providing the information to
others.

I indirectly got you to out yourself as an employee, ok you claim to be
a contractor, at Ullico. BTW, did you ever disgorge your illictly gotten
profits from WorldCom, like the rest of the Ullico executives were
compelled to do?

You outed your self to others as to your location in Calvert County
Maryland.

If you live in Maryland it is very easy to find out about the onwer of
each and every piece of property.

Another boating hazard
 

On May 8, 11:31*am, hk wrote:
On 5/8/10 11:08 AM, Loogypicker wrote:





On May 8, 9:40 am, *wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote:

That's because there is no answer, moron.

Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could
just make a phone call, without any identification, and get
information like that, how many times do you think there would be
lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's
plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied.
That's the answer.

I would guess the answer is in your own statement up there,
DumFochLoogy. Who says the calls were made without identification? I
didn't say that. Who says the offices of well-known criminal defense
lawyers don't have "connections" with court clerks, magistrates, and
"wants and warrants" desks? I didn't say that. One of your many problems
is that your world of real-life knowledge is...limited, as is your
intellect.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Just how the **** do you show proper credentials over the phone,
moron???? BTW, when you first tried this lie, I called the
jurisdiction in question and asked. You are a ****ing liar.

Another boating hazard
 

On 5/8/10 11:57 AM, BAR wrote:
In articledbWdnRBtu_n0GXjWnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
says...

On 5/8/10 11:32 AM, moose wrote:
On 5/8/2010 11:08 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On May 8, 9:40 am, wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote:



That's because there is no answer, moron.

Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could
just make a phone call, without any identification, and get
information like that, how many times do you think there would be
lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's
plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied.
That's the answer.

A lot of data is in the public record. You could learn a lot about Harry
if you knew where to look. A lot of it is archived here on rec.boats.
Name, address, phone numbers, so called wife's real name. Some of it is
in Calvert County records, but not under Harry's name. Some of it can be
goggled. Can't seem to find any public records in Georgia though.


Stalking again, flajim?

Funny how you have "stalked" yourself by providing the information to
others.

I indirectly got you to out yourself as an employee, ok you claim to be
a contractor, at Ullico. BTW, did you ever disgorge your illictly gotten
profits from WorldCom, like the rest of the Ullico executives were
compelled to do?

You outed your self to others as to your location in Calvert County
Maryland.

If you live in Maryland it is very easy to find out about the onwer of
each and every piece of property.







Y'all keep trying, Boatless Bert.

BTW, I was never on the board or a senior officer at ULLICO, so
therefore I was not a shareholder in that corporation. I'll leave it to
your birdbrain abilities to figure out the rest.




--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

Another boating hazard
 

On 5/8/2010 12:03 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/8/10 11:57 AM, BAR wrote:
In articledbWdnRBtu_n0GXjWnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
says...

On 5/8/10 11:32 AM, moose wrote:
On 5/8/2010 11:08 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On May 8, 9:40 am, wrote:
On 5/8/10 8:52 AM, Loogypicker wrote:



That's because there is no answer, moron.

Hehehe. Sure there is...but apparently not for you.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another
name.

Okay, try to think about your latest lie, dumb ass. If a person could
just make a phone call, without any identification, and get
information like that, how many times do you think there would be
lawsuits suing the jurisdiction that allowed that to happen. It's
plain stupid for someone to think that that could be done. You lied.
That's the answer.

A lot of data is in the public record. You could learn a lot about
Harry
if you knew where to look. A lot of it is archived here on rec.boats.
Name, address, phone numbers, so called wife's real name. Some of it is
in Calvert County records, but not under Harry's name. Some of it
can be
goggled. Can't seem to find any public records in Georgia though.


Stalking again, flajim?

Funny how you have "stalked" yourself by providing the information to
others.

I indirectly got you to out yourself as an employee, ok you claim to be
a contractor, at Ullico. BTW, did you ever disgorge your illictly gotten
profits from WorldCom, like the rest of the Ullico executives were
compelled to do?

You outed your self to others as to your location in Calvert County
Maryland.

If you live in Maryland it is very easy to find out about the onwer of
each and every piece of property.







Y'all keep trying, Boatless Bert.

BTW, I was never on the board or a senior officer at ULLICO, so
therefore I was not a shareholder in that corporation. I'll leave it to
your birdbrain abilities to figure out the rest.



Weren't you a public relations representative or some such? How long did
you manage to hang on to that job?