On 25/04/2010 9:13 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 08:55:47 -0600,
wrote:

On 25/04/2010 7:22 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/25/10 9:15 AM, BAR wrote:


Sorry, Clyde, but I'm not "jealous" of anyone here, or anywhere else,
for that matter. And this country has a long way to go before "equal
opportunity" becomes a reality.

As what was already said, it is clear you are about equal outcomes in
place of equal opportunity.

Hell, the USA is the most equal opportunity place on the planet.

more right wing bull****. i'm a scientist and go with the evidence.
the GINI coefficient is a measure of how equally income is distributed
among economic groups

guess which, of 26 countries, has the worst GINI coefficient

you right whiners. you have your bull**** mythology. and that's all
you need.

Tell me, besides the slums where you live, have you ever lived outside
of the county/state/USA??? Or did the 5 days in Mexico Holiday Inn make
you an international expert?

Not likely, because your mind is too narrow and single dimensional. So
focused on envy and self pity.

I am sure I can come up with all sorts of bull**** stats to say anything
I want. I looked at the GINI coefficient thing once an all I saw was
bull****. So what about the disparity...that has nothing to do with
happyness and wealth.

But I am game to do GINI. The three largest economies in the world, US,
India and China are both mid-pack in their ratings. They employ more
people, more production and higher standard of living than the rest of
world save for a few pockets of smaller populated areas.

Canada with 0.5% of the worlds population and the 2nd largest country in
the world, you don't see it as a top of the line for immigration. We
let in what the US rejects.

Canada, not as many "rich" as they move offshore to escape the punative
taxes. Taking their wealth with them. Most people in Canada go to work
and don't give a ****, low motivation. Hell, I get paid the same as my
counter part, why should I put out extra? It develops lethargy.

I would rather look at a crime and weather maps to look for where to
live. Hell, I could have stayed in low GINI coefcient Norway if I
wanted, better coefficient than Canada even. But it was a suffocating,
frozen wasteland and people didn't have the money to enjoy life. One
bar in a city of 110,000 people. Fortunately my assignment there was
only 1 year.

But GINI be your model as you are motivated by envy and greed of other
peoples wealth. Persoanlly, when someone with more money that I moves
in next door I am happier than a pig in **** because it keeps the
neighborhood up.

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.

On 4/25/10 12:50 PM, Canuck57 wrote:


I am sure I can come up with all sorts of bull**** stats to say anything
I want.

You already do that...try to impress us with something other than your
moronic right-wing ideology, eh?



--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

On 25/04/2010 8:55 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/25/10 10:46 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 25/04/2010 6:57 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/25/10 8:50 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleLNydne2k_LtkUk7WnZ2dnUVZ_oudnZ2d@earthlink .com,
says...

wrote in message
news On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:11:21 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/24/10 5:59 PM, Canuck57 wrote:


Did your mother have any children who succeeded in life?

4 out of 5 are well off. One chose liberalism and debt, suffice
it to
say she will be working until 65 or beyond. The rest of us talk of
early
retirement but for being bored. Really ****es her off when we get
together and start that discussion. But she did it to herself, the
only
one to go bankrupt. I actually feel sorry for her at times, the
price is
a heavy one emotionally to be the only liberal debt loving loser.


Interesting that when I asked about success in life, you equated
that
with money. Let's try again. Anyone in your family successful in
life?

someone once said 'the love of money is the root of all evil'...some
famous guy...



Seems as if your are very unhappy, and it is all about the lack of
money in
your case.

Jealousy is a vicious disease that will turn a person into a mean and
nasty old man.


Is that your explanation for Canuck and McGee? They're jealous, mean and
nasty? (Sounds like a bad vaudeville act... Canuck and McGee, playing
those two favorites of yesteryear, "Dumb and Dumber.")

Actually, hk you, bpuharic and defumer seem quite leftist and my guess
is you are all broke. Developes envy and entitlement...your messages
wreak of the it.

Need that "free" health care paid for by other peoples money... LOL.

Don't give me your virtue, it is bankrupt.


I'm what intelligent people might call a moderate lefty. I certainly
don't mind that description.

I'm sure my net worth is substantially more than yours.

As for my health care, I've been using my own money to pay for it for
many years.

And, unlike you, I don't spend my life whining about the future value of
money I don't have.

So what is your pick? Inherited? Lotto? Why cannot bpuharic and
others get off their lazy asses and get a piece of the pie? What really
limits them other than their letharic hopeless attitude?

Fired, so what. Get another job. Shave, don't smell, take some college
course and become a pro at something else than liberal whining.

And why should you (or I and others) pay for life on the lamb?

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.

On 25/04/2010 9:00 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 08:46:17 -0600,
wrote:

On 25/04/2010 6:57 AM, hk wrote:


Is that your explanation for Canuck and McGee? They're jealous, mean and
nasty? (Sounds like a bad vaudeville act... Canuck and McGee, playing
those two favorites of yesteryear, "Dumb and Dumber.")

Actually, hk you, bpuharic and defumer seem quite leftist and my guess
is you are all broke. Developes envy and entitlement...your messages
wreak of the it.

guess away. stereotyping to make yourself feel better is a classic
element of right wing thinking.


Need that "free" health care paid for by other peoples money... LOL.

we already pay for other people. ever been in the medical field?

no. i thought not.

We do and we shouldn't. I say this as if they can't manage their own
lives, perhaps they should be humble enough to let someone take them in
like lost sheep. Maybe learn something. That is if someone wants them.

Maslow had it right, we are all needy and greedy. And it is a decay of
the system when taxes can be used to prop up the lazy and corporations
for the name of "socialism". Want socialism, move to Cuba.

Trick is, want a piece of the pie, work for it. Big difference between
hand outs and hand ups. Beggars want handouts.

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.

On 25/04/2010 8:44 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/25/10 10:40 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/04/2010 4:11 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/24/10 5:59 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/04/2010 10:49 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/23/10 12:42 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/04/2010 5:01 AM, hk wrote:

How many Obamanites does it take to screw in a light bulb... none...
they'll sit on their fat lazy asses and wait for someone else to
do it
for them...



Are you trying to grab Tosk's belt signifying he is the Dumbest Poster
in Rec.Boats?

Sure seems that way, with one moronic statement, proclamation, or
mis-stated "unfactoid" after another.

Did your mother have any children who succeeded in life?

4 out of 5 are well off. One chose liberalism and debt, suffice it to
say she will be working until 65 or beyond. The rest of us talk of
early
retirement but for being bored. Really ****es her off when we get
together and start that discussion. But she did it to herself, the only
one to go bankrupt. I actually feel sorry for her at times, the
price is
a heavy one emotionally to be the only liberal debt loving loser.


Interesting that when I asked about success in life, you equated that
with money. Let's try again. Anyone in your family successful in life?

Try living without it, give up the car, no home, no vacation, no extras
for the kids, no visiting grandkids, arguements over money...

While I agree that money is not the be all end all, it sure helps to
have enough you don't get the aggrivation of worring about it. While it
is true money will not make you happy, not having enough will make you
miserable.



Yeah, well that is quite a bit different from measuring success in life
by how much money you've made, eh?

Yep, and life is too short to waste on envy of others and money arguments.

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.

On 4/25/10 1:02 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 25/04/2010 8:55 AM, hk wrote:



I'm what intelligent people might call a moderate lefty. I certainly
don't mind that description.

I'm sure my net worth is substantially more than yours.

As for my health care, I've been using my own money to pay for it for
many years.

And, unlike you, I don't spend my life whining about the future value of
money I don't have.



So what is your pick? Inherited? Lotto? Why cannot bpuharic and others
get off their lazy asses and get a piece of the pie? What really limits
them other than their letharic hopeless attitude?

Fired, so what. Get another job. Shave, don't smell, take some college
course and become a pro at something else than liberal whining.

And why should you (or I and others) pay for life on the lamb?



My pick?

My pick for what? Lotto?

What is "life on the lamb"?




--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

On 4/25/10 1:08 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 25/04/2010 9:00 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 08:46:17 -0600,
wrote:

On 25/04/2010 6:57 AM, hk wrote:


Is that your explanation for Canuck and McGee? They're jealous, mean
and
nasty? (Sounds like a bad vaudeville act... Canuck and McGee, playing
those two favorites of yesteryear, "Dumb and Dumber.")

Actually, hk you, bpuharic and defumer seem quite leftist and my guess
is you are all broke. Developes envy and entitlement...your messages
wreak of the it.

guess away. stereotyping to make yourself feel better is a classic
element of right wing thinking.


Need that "free" health care paid for by other peoples money... LOL.

we already pay for other people. ever been in the medical field?

no. i thought not.

We do and we shouldn't. I say this as if they can't manage their own
lives, perhaps they should be humble enough to let someone take them in
like lost sheep. Maybe learn something. That is if someone wants them.

Maslow had it right, we are all needy and greedy. And it is a decay of
the system when taxes can be used to prop up the lazy and corporations
for the name of "socialism". Want socialism, move to Cuba.

Trick is, want a piece of the pie, work for it. Big difference between
hand outs and hand ups. Beggars want handouts.



I keep getting this feeling you are living off a disability pension.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

On 4/25/10 1:09 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 25/04/2010 8:44 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/25/10 10:40 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 24/04/2010 4:11 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/24/10 5:59 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/04/2010 10:49 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/23/10 12:42 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/04/2010 5:01 AM, hk wrote:

How many Obamanites does it take to screw in a light bulb... none...
they'll sit on their fat lazy asses and wait for someone else to
do it
for them...



Are you trying to grab Tosk's belt signifying he is the Dumbest
Poster
in Rec.Boats?

Sure seems that way, with one moronic statement, proclamation, or
mis-stated "unfactoid" after another.

Did your mother have any children who succeeded in life?

4 out of 5 are well off. One chose liberalism and debt, suffice it to
say she will be working until 65 or beyond. The rest of us talk of
early
retirement but for being bored. Really ****es her off when we get
together and start that discussion. But she did it to herself, the
only
one to go bankrupt. I actually feel sorry for her at times, the
price is
a heavy one emotionally to be the only liberal debt loving loser.


Interesting that when I asked about success in life, you equated that
with money. Let's try again. Anyone in your family successful in life?

Try living without it, give up the car, no home, no vacation, no extras
for the kids, no visiting grandkids, arguements over money...

While I agree that money is not the be all end all, it sure helps to
have enough you don't get the aggrivation of worring about it. While it
is true money will not make you happy, not having enough will make you
miserable.



Yeah, well that is quite a bit different from measuring success in life
by how much money you've made, eh?

Yep, and life is too short to waste on envy of others and money arguments.



You spend most of your time here expressing your envy of others and in
"money arguments."

My guess is that you don't have two nickels to rub together, that you
are scared ****less about what happens when your job ends, and that you
are expressing nothing more here than bravado.

You have no boat, right? Do you have a car? You claim to be wealthy...so
what's your house look like? How many dress suits do you own that you've
bought in the last couple of years? How much do you pay for your suits?




--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:17:03 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


Not one of these leftist liberal-dimwits ever hit head on the the
following reasons why Obama is a BAD president.

1) Obama supports using the taxpayer system for support of private
corporations. This is tax slavery, corporations should never be allowed
to tax people nation wide for their short comings. This is corruption.

actually it's part of US history. it's always been done. and it's done
today in many ways.

when i worked for texas instruments, some of our equipment used a
touch screen GUI. the only US manufacturer of GUI's was supported by
the DoD even though it lost money, because it was a 'strategic
technology.'

so right off the bat you're filled with bull****.


2) Obama is debt spending like no other in history.

except for george bush, ronald reagan, FDR, etc.

again he's spouting bull****.

No controls on
government spending. None. Just record deficits and record debt. Just
like a debt worshiper out of control with other peoples money.

our debt, after obama's spending, will be lower than the debt/GDP
ratio of the US after ww2.

more bull****.


3) People wanted change all right, they wanted government pork fest
cleanup. Some decency in government. What do they get? Bigger, fatter
and up your arse governemnt. Worse than before.

cliche. cliche.

too bad this right wing idiot isn't paid by the cliche. he'd be richer
than bill gates.


4) Obama hasn't kept any of his major promises such as Iraq.

really? got any proof of that? right now US troop levels in iraq are
at 50K. the lowest they've been in years.

more right wing bull****


5) Obama behaves as if above the law,

ROFLMAO!!!

did he REALLY write this??? HAHAHAHAH!!!

george bush:

-arrested american citizens on american soil without charge
-wiretapped without court approval
-kept americans in prision with no access to counsel
-tortured americans in violation of law

see GM bond holders sho didn't get
their day in debtors court. Totally bypassed established bankruptcy laws.

gee. bankruptcy laws.

bush TORTURED US CITIZENS ON AMERICAN SOIL

obama 'bypassed bankruptcy laws'

but obama, you see, is a darkie. and bush was rich. and white.


None of the above has to do with race. Just that hk and pbuharic (and
others) know they can't defend Obama on logic and "free" health care is
more important than American futures.

notice that the racist right hates obama because of 'money'...while
they LOVE bush because he TORTURED US CITIZENS

the difference is that bush is white.


Pretty shallow types.

i guess he thinks teh US constitution allows torture of US citizens on
US soil

typical right winger

In article ,
says...
Please explain how I am a racist, since I do not have racist thoughts or
make derogatory comments about those whose "race" differs from mine and,
in fact, am happy to associate with people of good will, no matter how
good or bad a tan they have.

As long as their political beliefs are acceptable to you?


Try reading for content, stupid. I don't give a damn about skin color.
Hell, in my younger, single days, I gladly dated women of a variety of
skin colors, and had and still have close friends and associates of the
same variety. Hell, my wife is about as pale a "whitey" as you can be,
with her Irish and Nordic ancestry, mixed in with about 1/8th Cherokee.
Me, I just have enough of a European based ancestry to be a typical mutt.

As I have said before your words about race do not agree 99% of the
time.