Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:56:30 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 15/04/2010 12:03 AM, jps wrote: A bloody good idea... 98 percent of Americans are getting a tax cut this year thanks to Democratic legislation opposed by every single Republican. The teabaggers are still upset, of course, since this is somehow more evidence of "socialism". They are distraught that the richest 2 percent aren't getting their taxes cut as well. You have to look at democrats for teabaggers. As for tax cuts, two ways to look at it. Is Obama and democrats realizing Reaganomics was the right idea? Or is this more BS from the left? Gums a moving different than the pen. Obama style? gee. we cut taxes for the rich by 70% over the last 20 years. how'd that work out? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15/04/2010 6:11 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:56:30 -0600, wrote: On 15/04/2010 12:03 AM, jps wrote: A bloody good idea... 98 percent of Americans are getting a tax cut this year thanks to Democratic legislation opposed by every single Republican. The teabaggers are still upset, of course, since this is somehow more evidence of "socialism". They are distraught that the richest 2 percent aren't getting their taxes cut as well. You have to look at democrats for teabaggers. As for tax cuts, two ways to look at it. Is Obama and democrats realizing Reaganomics was the right idea? Or is this more BS from the left? Gums a moving different than the pen. Obama style? gee. we cut taxes for the rich by 70% over the last 20 years. how'd that work out? You are good proof why poor will remain poor. -- The Liberal way, take no responsibility. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:32:22 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 15/04/2010 6:11 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:56:30 -0600, wrote: gee. we cut taxes for the rich by 70% over the last 20 years. how'd that work out? You are good proof why poor will remain poor. i ask again: how'd those tax cuts for the rich work out? notice all he does is bitch? |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "bpuharic" wrote in message news ![]() fOn Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:03:54 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:11:19 -0400, bpuharic wrote: gee. we cut taxes for the rich by 70% over the last 20 years. We cut the tax for everyone. My taxes are about half what they were 20 years ago and we make more money. yeah. the middle class got a tax cut of about 25 bucks. I still have every 1040 since 1984, When I get a minute I will compile a list of gross vs tax and let's see what it looks like. I know I used to always say I expected to have that be about 20%. Now it is more like 10-11%. Anyone else want to play? when's the last time they cut middle class tax rates by 70%? My Federal tax rate this year was about 8%, I do not think it has ever been that low. Most of my income these days is dividends that get a preferred treatment as they have already been taxed. The other is a couple small retirements and Social Security. And that was with the standard deduction. Even with $7k of medical and dental, could not itemize. When I was in the semi-rich catagory for income they took about 30% federally. Plus 1.5% for medicare. During Clinton years, and the dot.com boom my options remitted 35% + 1.5% to the Fed's and 10% to the state of California. Seems as us "rich:" were paying more than our share. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/16/10 6:11 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:42:59 -0700, "Bill McKee" wrote: wrote in message news ![]() fOn Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:03:54 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:11:19 -0400, wrote: gee. we cut taxes for the rich by 70% over the last 20 years. We cut the tax for everyone. My taxes are about half what they were 20 years ago and we make more money. yeah. the middle class got a tax cut of about 25 bucks. I still have every 1040 since 1984, When I get a minute I will compile a list of gross vs tax and let's see what it looks like. I know I used to always say I expected to have that be about 20%. Now it is more like 10-11%. Anyone else want to play? when's the last time they cut middle class tax rates by 70%? My Federal tax rate this year was about 8% like i said: when's the last time they cut taxes for the middle class? you keep dodging the question i've seen or heard three independent reports so far this week that indicate that for the middle classes, taxes are now the lowest they have been in 65 years, and for the wealthy, the lowest they've been in close to 40 years, because of obama's tax cuts. not surprising, the tea party protests are...a fraud. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 06:38:07 -0400, hk
wrote: On 4/16/10 6:11 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:42:59 -0700, "Bill McKee" wrote: when's the last time they cut middle class tax rates by 70%? My Federal tax rate this year was about 8% like i said: when's the last time they cut taxes for the middle class? you keep dodging the question i've seen or heard three independent reports so far this week that indicate that for the middle classes, taxes are now the lowest they have been in 65 years, and for the wealthy, the lowest they've been in close to 40 years, because of obama's tax cuts. not surprising, the tea party protests are...a fraud. yep. absolutely true. obama has done what the GOP said would cause disaster...cut middle class taxes |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/16/10 3:04 PM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 06:38:07 -0400, wrote: i've seen or heard three independent reports so far this week that indicate that for the middle classes, taxes are now the lowest they have been in 65 years, and for the wealthy, the lowest they've been in close to 40 years, because of obama's tax cuts. not surprising, the tea party protests are...a fraud. I agree and I am one of the conservative folks here. If tea party people want to attack the deficit they need to talk about raising taxes. In the out years when our kids will be shouldering the debt burden there will not be enough discretionary spending to touch the deficit if we cut it all. At some point we are really going to have to throw SS and Medicare under the bus. Nobody is ever going to do that. They will simply "monetize" the debt and inflate our way out. Sure you will still get your $1700 check from SS but $100 won't cover an early bird dinner at the Perkins. All entitlements at the federal level should be thrown under the bus. Let the states do entitlements and see how long they last. What we need is a return to common sense and the teaching of liberty to our children. Ahhh...Bertie's been collecting teabagger sound bits to repost here. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|