leading spenders in US history? CONSERVATIVES
 

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:17:31 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message


to a certain extent, we are. and that's a measure of how deeply the
right wing has hurt the US.



Maybe the unemployment went down to 9.7%, but it was a lot less than that
when Obama took over. He pushed the "Stimulus" to keep unemployment
under
8%. How has that worked out?

pretty good. he's created 1.5M jobs. and the economy needs to grow at
5% for a year to reduce unemployment by 1%. hard to do in these times

You do not make sense. Because the unemployment numbers have had a short
dip below 10% all is good? the fact of the unemployment numbers
skyrocking before this under his watch means nothing?

Not all, but at least we're headed in the right direction, except for
nutcases like you of course. You can't be helped.

--
Nom=de=Plume

leading spenders in US history? CONSERVATIVES
 

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:25:59 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:17:31 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message


to a certain extent, we are. and that's a measure of how deeply the
right wing has hurt the US.



Maybe the unemployment went down to 9.7%, but it was a lot less than
that
when Obama took over. He pushed the "Stimulus" to keep unemployment
under
8%. How has that worked out?

pretty good. he's created 1.5M jobs. and the economy needs to grow at
5% for a year to reduce unemployment by 1%. hard to do in these times

You do not make sense. Because the unemployment numbers have had a short
dip below 10% all is good? the fact of the unemployment numbers
skyrocking
before this under his watch means nothing?

gee..it's been about 6 months or so since the 1.5M jobs obama created
pulled the rate from 10.7 to 9.7.

and the reason they skyrocketed was due to bush letting the wealthy
raid middle class workers' wealth.

obama had zip to do with what bush did




But Bush's financial advisors are the same people working for Obama. Did
they get smarter?

leading spenders in US history? CONSERVATIVES
 

On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:08:33 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:25:59 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



and the reason they skyrocketed was due to bush letting the wealthy
raid middle class workers' wealth.

obama had zip to do with what bush did




But Bush's financial advisors are the ople working for Obama. Did
they get smarter?

they must have. the economy is improving and the middle class now have
a healthcare program.

actually the problem was bush's inaction and belief in the unregulated
free market. bernanke and geithner now support regulation that they
didn't before. and the democrats are pushing it, while the republicans
meet in secret with wall street

leading spenders in US history? CONSERVATIVES
 

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:08:33 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:25:59 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



and the reason they skyrocketed was due to bush letting the wealthy
raid middle class workers' wealth.

obama had zip to do with what bush did




But Bush's financial advisors are the ople working for Obama. Did
they get smarter?

they must have. the economy is improving and the middle class now have
a healthcare program.

actually the problem was bush's inaction and belief in the unregulated
free market. bernanke and geithner now support regulation that they
didn't before. and the democrats are pushing it, while the republicans
meet in secret with wall street



Do you get a whistling sound in your head when the wind blows?

leading spenders in US history? CONSERVATIVES
 

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:33:22 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:08:33 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:





Do you get a whistling sound in your head when the wind blows?

yeah. it's when rush comes on.