Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:13:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "About 47 percent will pay no federal income taxes at all for 2009. Either their incomes were too low, or they qualified for enough credits, deductions and exemptions to eliminate their liability." Your philosophy: Soak the middle/lower earners, let the rich get richer. -- Nom=de=Plume When you have families in the $40-50k a year range paying zero taxes and 2 people making $70-80k paying 10% tax, I don't think anybody is soaking the little guy. You're really just playing with numbers. How many in that family? What deductions are they taking? Certainly not just the standard deduction. Two people who make the amount specified must also have something else going on. Not sure where you're getting your numbers on the tax bracket, but I believe this is accurate: http://www.bargaineering.com/article...projected.html Like I asked BP, what is this middle class who is getting soaked? With the new tax changes people making over $250k are probably going to be paying close to 90% of the taxes. Well, that seems about right or perhaps a bit high. If you really want to see some taxes, get that "free" public health care thing going. It ads about 25% to the average Canadian's tax bill, far more than that for a Frenchman Except that they get a great benefit. They live longer and have far better outcomes. In addition, without starting to reform the healthcare/ins. system, the costs will go way beyond what you're quoting. That path will lead to a true economic meltdown. What happened legislatively wasn't enough, far from it, but it's going in the right direction. As someone said, you're either on the bus or off the bus. I'd prefer to be on the bus. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Exploiting low income workers | ASA | |||
anyone want voyaging on a small income by annie hill? | Boat Building |