On 04/04/2010 7:58 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 18:05:39 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

I have done just what this administration has encouraged me to do, I
have eliminated employees.

george bush took care of that in 2007 when he laid the groundwork for
10% unemployment as he bankrolled the rich


This is the economy of the Obama
years.

unemployment is down 10% under obama. your delusions notwithstanding

No worries about health plans, no worries about workers comp,
pensions, etc, I am free to use my mind to invent instead of doing
govt paperwork. Thank You Mr Obama.

more hatred of the black president? seems you guys think he's been
president for 9 years

Jobs? What about Jobs? Those are your problem since you voted for
him.

the 165,000 created last month. those are the jobs

we can do without the few you elminated because obama's created 1.5M
over the last year


I will say you are an optimist, but the sad fact is this month numbers
were neutral. So what if you create 165,000 low wage part time jobs to
replace the 165,000 lost better jobs?

Doubtful the governemtn would not want to quote a real number like net
national wages for the month.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 04/04/2010 7:58 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 18:05:39 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

I have done just what this administration has encouraged me to do, I
have eliminated employees.

george bush took care of that in 2007 when he laid the groundwork for
10% unemployment as he bankrolled the rich


This is the economy of the Obama
years.

unemployment is down 10% under obama. your delusions notwithstanding

No worries about health plans, no worries about workers comp,
pensions, etc, I am free to use my mind to invent instead of doing
govt paperwork. Thank You Mr Obama.

more hatred of the black president? seems you guys think he's been
president for 9 years

Jobs? What about Jobs? Those are your problem since you voted for
him.

the 165,000 created last month. those are the jobs

we can do without the few you elminated because obama's created 1.5M
over the last year


I will say you are an optimist, but the sad fact is this month numbers
were neutral. So what if you create 165,000 low wage part time jobs to
replace the 165,000 lost better jobs?

Doubtful the governemtn would not want to quote a real number like net
national wages for the month.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


Neutral? Oh, I thought you said you were neutered. My mistake. Compare job
growth/loss to GWB's stunning work.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:55:10 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 04/04/2010 7:58 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 18:05:39 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch


we can do without the few you elminated because obama's created 1.5M
over the last year


I will say you are an optimist, but the sad fact is this month numbers
were neutral. So what if you create 165,000 low wage part time jobs to
replace the 165,000 lost better jobs?

i'm not the optimist; economists are, including those at the AEI.
hardly a liberal think tank

and a job is better than welfare