BoatBanter.com - More hopeless change

On Mar 29, 10:16*am, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:29:48 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:18:09 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:50:17 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

I agree Greenspan was the source of the cancer in the belly of the
beast, along with Summers, Geithner and Rubin but they all worked for
Clinton. You can't rewrite that history
Two of them are still directing financial policy for Obama.

except, of course, clinton wasn't president from 2000-2008. *i suggest
you learn some history.

I suggest you go look at who Clinton's fed chair was and who was the
chair of the New York Fed bank.

i suggest you look at who was president during the meltdown. *

Then look at who Clinton's advisors were. (hint, all 4 of those names
will appear)

i suggest you look at who was president during the meltdown.

Then look at who signed the two main deregulation bills that allowed
the mortgage disaster by allowing deposit banks to get in the
brokerage business and repealing the "bucket shop" laws that banned
derivatives. *

i suggest you look at who was president during the meltdown

and i suggest you check out how phil gramm filibusterd the bill to
regulate derivatives until the ability of the govt to do this was
stripped from the bill

Was it vetoed or did Mr Clinton have a big signing ceremony and tell
us how much this was going to stimulate the economy. (careful there,
the video is on the 60 Minutes web site) Well we saw the stimulation
then we saw the result. I guess you had the flu the day they taught
cause and effect in school.
I don't let Bush off the hook either (both of them) but I really
believe Bush/Clinton/Bush was 20 years of the corporations running the
government. I believe Clinton when he says he is the 4th Bush brother.

Funny how these kind of posts go unanswered...

Scotty

--
For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What's to answer? I didn't see a question....