| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Eisboch" wrote in message
... "jps" wrote in message news
You may read, but you don't seem to comprehend very well. I never suggested anything like that. A simple case of gangrene is life threatening. Eisboch A simple cold can turn into pneumonia, which is life threatening. Not knowing colesteral counts can lead to heart disease and catastrophic outcomes. I don't know where you think you'd draw the line. It's proven that consistency of care when health is a key factor in preventing the types of diseases and afflictions that end up costing huge money. This is just as short-sighted as those who favor funding jails to pre-school. Is that somehow miscomprehending your intent? I think it's just lacking in some common sense. Eisboch The typical sort of system that I'm used to has a triage system, whereby a nurse practitioner handles the initial call. If s/he feels it might be worth proceeding with a doctor telephone call or a visit, it's decided then. I also have access to my doctor directly via email (answered the same day) or telephone (next business day, typically). That takes it out of the hands of the patient deciding if it's trivial or not. -- Nom=de=Plume |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Martha Coakley: I will deny life saving treatment | General | |||
| Olympic Coverage | General | |||
| Katrina coverage | General | |||