Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
BoatBanter.com
»
rec.boats
»
General
>
Bliues deny coverage to ill newborn baby
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Prev
Next
#
10
posted to rec.boats
I am Tosk
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,921
Bliues deny coverage to ill newborn baby
In article ,
says...
"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:57:48 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:
On 28/03/2010 6:26 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:51:01 -0600,
wrote:
So let me ask, if this was a precondition, did they jump on health care
after getting the ultrasound that showed defects? You know, subscribe
by convenience? That is, not subscribe until they needed it
freeloading?
notice how the right hates the middle class so much they're willing to
blame a dying baby for having a 'pre existing condition'?
Don't hate them at all, just don't like the abuse and freeloading. Which
this case highlights perfectly.
couldnt have said it better myself
he just said he wants dead babies to punish freeloading parents.
Did you do further research? Bet not.
Turns out these idiots didn't have health care on the mother and
father as money there had different priorities. Further, they sought
insurance AFTER they needed it.
uh...so what? so the baby dies. just punishment, eh? more dead middle
class kids...that's what the middle class deserves
This is a pure case of some low lifes freeloading.
and if we'd had universal healthcare like in more advanced countries
the baby would have lived
but you dont care. you're right wing. if children die, so what? at
least the rich stay rich and THEIR children will live
Playing the sympathy
screw for parental negligence. Not having insurance and then when they
have a problem they subscribe.
Just jacks the rates for the rest of us.
kill 'em. hell, why not just shoot the babies of the poor...gas
'em...
and if it jacks the rates for the rest of us...then why doesn't this
happen in other countries?
you right wingers have no answer for this, do you? other countries
have better healthcare, universal, at lower cost
BUT...because it's socialized, you'd rather have children die than
admit your fundamentalist faith in the free market HAS to be right
even when it's wrong
Now think of the millions who get jobs with health care when they think
they need it yet as soon as they don't... Too much free loading.
should we at least pay for coffins to bury dead children? would the
right wing support THAT?
or is that freeloading, too?
Why should Blue Cross pay, when the insurance was taken out after
conception? Why didn't the hospital perform the surgury gratis, under the
charter?
You best watch yourself talking about health care takeover again. It's
been off the front burner for a week now and you don't want the dem
leadership to start more stories about republicans do you? That whole
fake spitting incident turned into a week of sillyness by the dems.
Scotty
--
For a great time, go here first...
http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v
Reply With Quote
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
Off
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Martha Coakley: I will deny life saving treatment
C. Mor Butts
General
2
January 15th 10
01:33 PM
Olympic Coverage
Skipper
General
0
February 11th 06
12:54 AM
Katrina coverage
Doug Kanter
General
1
August 31st 05
08:06 PM
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
07:14 PM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
BoatBanter Home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks