On Mar 6, 1:59*pm, Harry wrote:
On 3/6/10 1:49 PM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Mar 6, 1:23 pm, *wrote:
On 3/6/10 1:20 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Mar 6, 11:09 am, * *wrote:
On 3/6/10 10:48 AM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Mar 6, 9:27 am, * * *wrote:
Order made, and paid. Watch your mail this week.

?;^ )

Can't wait!! But, I do see that as usual, Harry's in a hissy fit
because it isn't anything to do with him!

Why would I want to be involved in something that has something to do
with you?

--
Which one is the girl?

http://tinyurl.com/ycpsnzz

True, you ARE a scared fat bitch.

Let's see... *you* fantasize about me, and your wife fantasizes about
being married to a man with a brain.

Seems fair.

Call back when you think you have something clever to post.

Oh...haven't heard from your sheriff or whatever yet... *:)

Yes, we have. It's in my lawyer's hands. Stay tuned, fat boy.

Uh-huh. Well, I have 57 or 58 posts of yours, with real headers, from a
handful of posters here you have physically threatened. Now, whether
*you* think you have threatened them is not relevant. The authorities
will. Oh...and I wouldn't suggest you use my promise to handle you
appropriately if you engaged in felonious home invasion as a
threat...because such is allowed.

Ta-ta, moron.

--
Which one is the girl?

http://tinyurl.com/ycpsnzz- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, the "authorities" won't unless someone HAS been threatened with
physical harm. But, hey, go ahead, give it a try. And this has nothing
to do with your threats to illegally shoot someone. It has to do with
your statement that *I* broke my daughter's arms. If you are
withholding evidence of such, that is a crime. Other than that little
tidbit, it's also slander.
Again, stay tuned. You do what you think you need to do. Have at it,
you'll be laughed at when you show the "authorities" that I stated
that I would come for a visit this spring.

Loogypicker wrote:


No, the "authorities" won't unless someone HAS been threatened with
physical harm. But, hey, go ahead, give it a try. And this has nothing
to do with your threats to illegally shoot someone. It has to do with
your statement that *I* broke my daughter's arms. If you are
withholding evidence of such, that is a crime. Other than that little
tidbit, it's also slander.
Again, stay tuned. You do what you think you need to do. Have at it,
you'll be laughed at when you show the "authorities" that I stated
that I would come for a visit this spring.

Boogerman, got news for you. Lawsuits from fictional usenet characters
never even get entertained by a court.
You can't slander Elmer Fudd, either. Why? Not a real person.
Your "daughter" isn't a real "person" either.
Unless you post under your real name, you are not a "person."
Hey, that's how you want it, so live with it.
Now, tell us again why it is that nobody should use their real name on
usenet.
BTW, Harry, Scotty, Tim, John, Tom, Wayne, Richard, Greg, et al, are
real people. They actually may be able to successfully file a slander suit.
I'd tell you to ask deplume, who claims to be a lawyer, for advice on
that, but she's just another fictional character.
So you're SOL.

On 3/6/10 5:12 PM, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:


No, the "authorities" won't unless someone HAS been threatened with
physical harm. But, hey, go ahead, give it a try. And this has nothing
to do with your threats to illegally shoot someone. It has to do with
your statement that *I* broke my daughter's arms. If you are
withholding evidence of such, that is a crime. Other than that little
tidbit, it's also slander.
Again, stay tuned. You do what you think you need to do. Have at it,
you'll be laughed at when you show the "authorities" that I stated
that I would come for a visit this spring.

Boogerman, got news for you. Lawsuits from fictional usenet characters
never even get entertained by a court.
You can't slander Elmer Fudd, either. Why? Not a real person.
Your "daughter" isn't a real "person" either.
Unless you post under your real name, you are not a "person."
Hey, that's how you want it, so live with it.
Now, tell us again why it is that nobody should use their real name on
usenet.
BTW, Harry, Scotty, Tim, John, Tom, Wayne, Richard, Greg, et al, are
real people. They actually may be able to successfully file a slander suit.
I'd tell you to ask deplume, who claims to be a lawyer, for advice on
that, but she's just another fictional character.
So you're SOL.




Damn...you let the cat out of the bag! :(

--
Which one is the girl?

http://tinyurl.com/ycpsnzz

On Mar 6, 5:12*pm, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:

No, the "authorities" won't unless someone HAS been threatened with
physical harm. But, hey, go ahead, give it a try. And this has nothing
to do with your threats to illegally shoot someone. It has to do with
your statement that *I* broke my daughter's arms. If you are
withholding evidence of such, that is a crime. Other than that little
tidbit, it's also slander.
Again, stay tuned. You do what you think you need to do. Have at it,
you'll be laughed at when you show the "authorities" that I stated
that I would come for a visit this spring.

Boogerman, got news for you. *Lawsuits from fictional usenet characters
never even get entertained by a court.
You can't slander Elmer Fudd, either. *Why? *Not a real person.
Your "daughter" isn't a real "person" either.
Unless you post under your real name, you are not a "person."
Hey, that's how you want it, so live with it.
Now, tell us again why it is that nobody should use their real name on
usenet.
BTW, Harry, Scotty, Tim, John, Tom, Wayne, Richard, Greg, et al, are
real people. *They actually may be able to successfully file a slander suit.
I'd tell you to ask deplume, who claims to be a lawyer, for advice on
that, but she's just another fictional character.
So you're SOL.

Nope, you don't even get it. I (and my lawyer) have the posts that
Harry made stating that he know who I am, where I live, etc. That is
NOT anonymous. Stay tuned. You're not helping your asshole buddy Harry
one little bit.

Now, ask your asshole buddy this. If that blather above were true,
then how is he going to be able to tell the "authorities" that I
threatened him so when I show up at his house, he shoots me?

On 3/7/10 10:37 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 6, 5:12 pm, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:

No, the "authorities" won't unless someone HAS been threatened with
physical harm. But, hey, go ahead, give it a try. And this has nothing
to do with your threats to illegally shoot someone. It has to do with
your statement that *I* broke my daughter's arms. If you are
withholding evidence of such, that is a crime. Other than that little
tidbit, it's also slander.
Again, stay tuned. You do what you think you need to do. Have at it,
you'll be laughed at when you show the "authorities" that I stated
that I would come for a visit this spring.

Boogerman, got news for you. Lawsuits from fictional usenet characters
never even get entertained by a court.
You can't slander Elmer Fudd, either. Why? Not a real person.
Your "daughter" isn't a real "person" either.
Unless you post under your real name, you are not a "person."
Hey, that's how you want it, so live with it.
Now, tell us again why it is that nobody should use their real name on
usenet.
BTW, Harry, Scotty, Tim, John, Tom, Wayne, Richard, Greg, et al, are
real people. They actually may be able to successfully file a slander suit.
I'd tell you to ask deplume, who claims to be a lawyer, for advice on
that, but she's just another fictional character.
So you're SOL.

Nope, you don't even get it. I (and my lawyer) have the posts that
Harry made stating that he know who I am, where I live, etc. That is
NOT anonymous. Stay tuned. You're not helping your asshole buddy Harry
one little bit.

Now, ask your asshole buddy this. If that blather above were true,
then how is he going to be able to tell the "authorities" that I
threatened him so when I show up at his house, he shoots me?


You've told us you're *not* Kevin Noble, **** for brains.




--
Which one is the girl?

http://tinyurl.com/ycpsnzz

Loogypicker wrote:

Nope, you don't even get it. I (and my lawyer) have the posts that
Harry made stating that he know who I am, where I live, etc. That is
NOT anonymous.

How much you paying the lawyer telling you this?
He's screwing you.
You don't seriously think a judge cares about what the 2 biggest
blowhards on rec.boats are posting at each other, do you?
Your ego is even bigger than Harry's if you believe that.
You and harry are just different sides of the same coin.


Stay tuned. You're not helping your asshole buddy Harry
one little bit.

I don't care much about you or Harry, but don't wish you ill.
Fate usually hands people their just due.
After the completely worthless spoofing Florida Jim, you just might take
the record for worthless posts going after Harry.
You're always cussing too.
Bet your mama used a lot of soap in that mouth.

Now, ask your asshole buddy this. If that blather above were true,
then how is he going to be able to tell the "authorities" that I
threatened him so when I show up at his house, he shoots me?

Simple. He'd shoot anybody who showed up and trespassed.
In the end it doesn't matter whose name they find on the corpse.
For you though, the reason you showed up would be documented.
That way, the news headlines wouldn't say "Intruder Shot."
They would say, "Usenet Egomaniac Shot on Property of Usenet Egomaniac
Rival - Hilarious and Sad Details on page 37."

On Mar 7, 5:43*pm, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:

Nope, you don't even get it. I (and my lawyer) have the posts that
Harry made stating that he know who I am, where I live, etc. That is
NOT anonymous.

How much you paying the lawyer telling you this?
He's screwing you.
You don't seriously think a judge cares about what the 2 biggest
blowhards on rec.boats are posting at each other, do you?
Your ego is even bigger than Harry's if you believe that.
You and harry are just different sides of the same coin.

Stay tuned. You're not helping your asshole buddy Harry
one little bit.

I don't care much about you or Harry, but don't wish you ill.
Fate usually hands people their just due.
After the completely worthless spoofing Florida Jim, you just might take
the record for worthless posts going after Harry.
You're always cussing too.
Bet your mama used a lot of soap in that mouth.

Now, ask your asshole buddy this. If that blather above were true,
then how is he going to be able to tell the "authorities" that I
threatened him so when I show up at his house, he shoots me?

Simple. *He'd shoot anybody who showed up and trespassed.
In the end it doesn't matter whose name they find on the corpse.
For you though, the reason you showed up would be documented.
That way, the news headlines wouldn't say "Intruder Shot."
They would say, "Usenet Egomaniac Shot on Property of Usenet Egomaniac
Rival - Hilarious and Sad Details on page 37."

What "reason" is "documented"? Show me.

On 3/8/10 8:38 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 7, 5:43 pm, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:

Nope, you don't even get it. I (and my lawyer) have the posts that
Harry made stating that he know who I am, where I live, etc. That is
NOT anonymous.

How much you paying the lawyer telling you this?
He's screwing you.
You don't seriously think a judge cares about what the 2 biggest
blowhards on rec.boats are posting at each other, do you?
Your ego is even bigger than Harry's if you believe that.
You and harry are just different sides of the same coin.

Stay tuned. You're not helping your asshole buddy Harry
one little bit.

I don't care much about you or Harry, but don't wish you ill.
Fate usually hands people their just due.
After the completely worthless spoofing Florida Jim, you just might take
the record for worthless posts going after Harry.
You're always cussing too.
Bet your mama used a lot of soap in that mouth.

Now, ask your asshole buddy this. If that blather above were true,
then how is he going to be able to tell the "authorities" that I
threatened him so when I show up at his house, he shoots me?

Simple. He'd shoot anybody who showed up and trespassed.
In the end it doesn't matter whose name they find on the corpse.
For you though, the reason you showed up would be documented.
That way, the news headlines wouldn't say "Intruder Shot."
They would say, "Usenet Egomaniac Shot on Property of Usenet Egomaniac
Rival - Hilarious and Sad Details on page 37."

What "reason" is "documented"? Show me.


Has anyone ever bothered to respond the way you want to one of your
"show me" demands?

"Show me, show me, prove it, prove it."

You are the very definition of asshole, loogy.


Look, everyone...I called loogy an asshole. His lawyer is going to sue me.

You're an asshole, loogy. Live with it.

Loogypicker wrote:


No, the "authorities" won't unless someone HAS been threatened with
physical harm. But, hey, go ahead, give it a try. And this has nothing
to do with your threats to illegally shoot someone. It has to do with
your statement that *I* broke my daughter's arms. If you are
withholding evidence of such, that is a crime. Other than that little
tidbit, it's also slander.
Again, stay tuned. You do what you think you need to do. Have at it,
you'll be laughed at when you show the "authorities" that I stated
that I would come for a visit this spring.

Boogerman, got news for you. Lawsuits from fictional usenet characters
never even get entertained by a court.
You can't slander Elmer Fudd, either. Why? Not a real person.
Your "daughter" isn't a real "person" either.
Unless you post under your real name, you are not a "person."
Hey, that's how you want it, so live with it.
Now, tell us again why it is that nobody should use their real name on
usenet.
BTW, Harry, Scotty, Tim, John, Tom, Wayne, Richard, Greg, et al, are
real people. They actually may be able to successfully file a slander suit.
I'd tell you to ask deplume, who claims to be a lawyer, for advice on
that, but she's just another fictional character.
So you're SOL.

"Frogloogyherringsnacks" wrote in message
...
Loogypicker wrote:


No, the "authorities" won't unless someone HAS been threatened with
physical harm. But, hey, go ahead, give it a try. And this has nothing
to do with your threats to illegally shoot someone. It has to do with
your statement that *I* broke my daughter's arms. If you are
withholding evidence of such, that is a crime. Other than that little
tidbit, it's also slander.
Again, stay tuned. You do what you think you need to do. Have at it,
you'll be laughed at when you show the "authorities" that I stated
that I would come for a visit this spring.

Boogerman, got news for you. Lawsuits from fictional usenet characters
never even get entertained by a court.
You can't slander Elmer Fudd, either. Why? Not a real person.
Your "daughter" isn't a real "person" either.
Unless you post under your real name, you are not a "person."
Hey, that's how you want it, so live with it.
Now, tell us again why it is that nobody should use their real name on
usenet.
BTW, Harry, Scotty, Tim, John, Tom, Wayne, Richard, Greg, et al, are
real people. They actually may be able to successfully file a slander
suit.
I'd tell you to ask deplume, who claims to be a lawyer, for advice on
that, but she's just another fictional character.
So you're SOL.



lol! Interesting twist. Most would not argue that Elmer Fudd is fictional.
Most around here would also not argue that Loogy is a person. It does not
matter what name he uses to post. It doesn't change the fact that he's a
person.

Be that as it may, I'm just cracking up watching harry run around with his
tail between his legs. He's trying to post as much "defense" as possible
around here. He sure must be scared of something.

It's gonna be fun to watch this play out.

--Mike