Tom, Loogy, Scott, John, Richard...
 

Harry wrote:
On 3/6/10 9:27 AM, Tim wrote:
Order made, and paid. Watch your mail this week.

?;^ )




Don't forget to tweet 'em, send 'em emails, and leave messages on their
phone answering machines. :)

Let me guess...

For Tom, you ordered a refill of his bipolar meds...

For Loogy, you ordered a brain...

For Scott, you ordered a haircut and a bath...

For JohnH, you ordered a membership card in MS-13...

For Richard...Eisboch?...a flashy neon sign for his guitar store.

Right?


Transparent air-gee-tar pick, alternator-shaped.

Tom, Loogy, Scott, John, Richard...
 

Harry wrote:
On 3/6/10 9:27 AM, Tim wrote:
Order made, and paid. Watch your mail this week.

?;^ )




Don't forget to tweet 'em, send 'em emails, and leave messages on their
phone answering machines. :)

Let me guess...

For Tom, you ordered a refill of his bipolar meds...

For Loogy, you ordered a brain...

For Scott, you ordered a haircut and a bath...

For JohnH, you ordered a membership card in MS-13...

For Richard...Eisboch?...a flashy neon sign for his guitar store.

Right?


Transparent air-gee-tar pick, alternator-shaped.

Tom, Loogy, Scott, John, Richard...
 

Loogypicker wrote:


No, the "authorities" won't unless someone HAS been threatened with
physical harm. But, hey, go ahead, give it a try. And this has nothing
to do with your threats to illegally shoot someone. It has to do with
your statement that *I* broke my daughter's arms. If you are
withholding evidence of such, that is a crime. Other than that little
tidbit, it's also slander.
Again, stay tuned. You do what you think you need to do. Have at it,
you'll be laughed at when you show the "authorities" that I stated
that I would come for a visit this spring.

Boogerman, got news for you. Lawsuits from fictional usenet characters
never even get entertained by a court.
You can't slander Elmer Fudd, either. Why? Not a real person.
Your "daughter" isn't a real "person" either.
Unless you post under your real name, you are not a "person."
Hey, that's how you want it, so live with it.
Now, tell us again why it is that nobody should use their real name on
usenet.
BTW, Harry, Scotty, Tim, John, Tom, Wayne, Richard, Greg, et al, are
real people. They actually may be able to successfully file a slander suit.
I'd tell you to ask deplume, who claims to be a lawyer, for advice on
that, but she's just another fictional character.
So you're SOL.

Tom, Loogy, Scott, John, Richard...
 

Harry wrote:
On 3/6/10 9:27 AM, Tim wrote:
Order made, and paid. Watch your mail this week.

?;^ )




Don't forget to tweet 'em, send 'em emails, and leave messages on their
phone answering machines. :)

Let me guess...

For Tom, you ordered a refill of his bipolar meds...

For Loogy, you ordered a brain...

For Scott, you ordered a haircut and a bath...

For JohnH, you ordered a membership card in MS-13...

For Richard...Eisboch?...a flashy neon sign for his guitar store.

Right?


Transparent air-gee-tar pick, alternator-shaped.

Tom, Loogy, Scott, John, Richard...
 

Loogypicker wrote:


No, the "authorities" won't unless someone HAS been threatened with
physical harm. But, hey, go ahead, give it a try. And this has nothing
to do with your threats to illegally shoot someone. It has to do with
your statement that *I* broke my daughter's arms. If you are
withholding evidence of such, that is a crime. Other than that little
tidbit, it's also slander.
Again, stay tuned. You do what you think you need to do. Have at it,
you'll be laughed at when you show the "authorities" that I stated
that I would come for a visit this spring.

Boogerman, got news for you. Lawsuits from fictional usenet characters
never even get entertained by a court.
You can't slander Elmer Fudd, either. Why? Not a real person.
Your "daughter" isn't a real "person" either.
Unless you post under your real name, you are not a "person."
Hey, that's how you want it, so live with it.
Now, tell us again why it is that nobody should use their real name on
usenet.
BTW, Harry, Scotty, Tim, John, Tom, Wayne, Richard, Greg, et al, are
real people. They actually may be able to successfully file a slander suit.
I'd tell you to ask deplume, who claims to be a lawyer, for advice on
that, but she's just another fictional character.
So you're SOL.

Tom, Loogy, Scott, John, Richard...
 

On 3/6/10 5:12 PM, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:


No, the "authorities" won't unless someone HAS been threatened with
physical harm. But, hey, go ahead, give it a try. And this has nothing
to do with your threats to illegally shoot someone. It has to do with
your statement that *I* broke my daughter's arms. If you are
withholding evidence of such, that is a crime. Other than that little
tidbit, it's also slander.
Again, stay tuned. You do what you think you need to do. Have at it,
you'll be laughed at when you show the "authorities" that I stated
that I would come for a visit this spring.

Boogerman, got news for you. Lawsuits from fictional usenet characters
never even get entertained by a court.
You can't slander Elmer Fudd, either. Why? Not a real person.
Your "daughter" isn't a real "person" either.
Unless you post under your real name, you are not a "person."
Hey, that's how you want it, so live with it.
Now, tell us again why it is that nobody should use their real name on
usenet.
BTW, Harry, Scotty, Tim, John, Tom, Wayne, Richard, Greg, et al, are
real people. They actually may be able to successfully file a slander suit.
I'd tell you to ask deplume, who claims to be a lawyer, for advice on
that, but she's just another fictional character.
So you're SOL.




Damn...you let the cat out of the bag! :(

--
Which one is the girl?

http://tinyurl.com/ycpsnzz

Tom, Loogy, Scott, John, Richard...
 

"Frogloogyherringsnacks" wrote in message
...
Loogypicker wrote:


No, the "authorities" won't unless someone HAS been threatened with
physical harm. But, hey, go ahead, give it a try. And this has nothing
to do with your threats to illegally shoot someone. It has to do with
your statement that *I* broke my daughter's arms. If you are
withholding evidence of such, that is a crime. Other than that little
tidbit, it's also slander.
Again, stay tuned. You do what you think you need to do. Have at it,
you'll be laughed at when you show the "authorities" that I stated
that I would come for a visit this spring.

Boogerman, got news for you. Lawsuits from fictional usenet characters
never even get entertained by a court.
You can't slander Elmer Fudd, either. Why? Not a real person.
Your "daughter" isn't a real "person" either.
Unless you post under your real name, you are not a "person."
Hey, that's how you want it, so live with it.
Now, tell us again why it is that nobody should use their real name on
usenet.
BTW, Harry, Scotty, Tim, John, Tom, Wayne, Richard, Greg, et al, are
real people. They actually may be able to successfully file a slander
suit.
I'd tell you to ask deplume, who claims to be a lawyer, for advice on
that, but she's just another fictional character.
So you're SOL.



lol! Interesting twist. Most would not argue that Elmer Fudd is fictional.
Most around here would also not argue that Loogy is a person. It does not
matter what name he uses to post. It doesn't change the fact that he's a
person.

Be that as it may, I'm just cracking up watching harry run around with his
tail between his legs. He's trying to post as much "defense" as possible
around here. He sure must be scared of something.

It's gonna be fun to watch this play out.

--Mike

Tom, Loogy, Scott, John, Richard...
 

On 3/6/10 9:50 PM, mgg wrote:


"Frogloogyherringsnacks" wrote in message
...
Loogypicker wrote:


No, the "authorities" won't unless someone HAS been threatened with
physical harm. But, hey, go ahead, give it a try. And this has nothing
to do with your threats to illegally shoot someone. It has to do with
your statement that *I* broke my daughter's arms. If you are
withholding evidence of such, that is a crime. Other than that little
tidbit, it's also slander.
Again, stay tuned. You do what you think you need to do. Have at it,
you'll be laughed at when you show the "authorities" that I stated
that I would come for a visit this spring.

Boogerman, got news for you. Lawsuits from fictional usenet characters
never even get entertained by a court.
You can't slander Elmer Fudd, either. Why? Not a real person.
Your "daughter" isn't a real "person" either.
Unless you post under your real name, you are not a "person."
Hey, that's how you want it, so live with it.
Now, tell us again why it is that nobody should use their real name on
usenet.
BTW, Harry, Scotty, Tim, John, Tom, Wayne, Richard, Greg, et al, are
real people. They actually may be able to successfully file a slander
suit.
I'd tell you to ask deplume, who claims to be a lawyer, for advice on
that, but she's just another fictional character.
So you're SOL.



lol! Interesting twist. Most would not argue that Elmer Fudd is
fictional. Most around here would also not argue that Loogy is a person.
It does not matter what name he uses to post. It doesn't change the fact
that he's a person.

Be that as it may, I'm just cracking up watching harry run around with
his tail between his legs. He's trying to post as much "defense" as
possible around here. He sure must be scared of something.

It's gonna be fun to watch this play out.

--Mike


You *really* are a moron, with no understanding of the legalities. Loogy
might as well call himself Elmer Fudd.



--
Which one is the girl?

http://tinyurl.com/ycpsnzz

Tom, Loogy, Scott, John, Richard...
 

Harry wrote:
On 3/6/10 1:49 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 6, 1:23 pm, wrote:
On 3/6/10 1:20 PM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Mar 6, 11:09 am, wrote:
On 3/6/10 10:48 AM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Mar 6, 9:27 am, wrote:
Order made, and paid. Watch your mail this week.

?;^ )

Can't wait!! But, I do see that as usual, Harry's in a hissy fit
because it isn't anything to do with him!

Why would I want to be involved in something that has something to do
with you?

--
Which one is the girl?

http://tinyurl.com/ycpsnzz

True, you ARE a scared fat bitch.

Let's see... *you* fantasize about me, and your wife fantasizes about
being married to a man with a brain.

Seems fair.

Call back when you think you have something clever to post.

Oh...haven't heard from your sheriff or whatever yet... :)


Yes, we have. It's in my lawyer's hands. Stay tuned, fat boy.


Uh-huh. Well, I have 57 or 58 posts of yours, with real headers, from
a handful of posters here you have physically threatened. Now, whether
*you* think you have threatened them is not relevant. The authorities
will. Oh...and I wouldn't suggest you use my promise to handle you
appropriately if you engaged in felonious home invasion as a
threat...because such is allowed.

Ta-ta, moron.


Are you for real? What are you two fighting over? Some internet BS?

Tom, Loogy, Scott, John, Richard...
 

On 3/6/10 11:06 PM, Larry wrote:
Harry wrote:
On 3/6/10 1:49 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 6, 1:23 pm, wrote:
On 3/6/10 1:20 PM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Mar 6, 11:09 am, wrote:
On 3/6/10 10:48 AM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Mar 6, 9:27 am, wrote:
Order made, and paid. Watch your mail this week.

?;^ )

Can't wait!! But, I do see that as usual, Harry's in a hissy fit
because it isn't anything to do with him!

Why would I want to be involved in something that has something to do
with you?

--
Which one is the girl?

http://tinyurl.com/ycpsnzz

True, you ARE a scared fat bitch.

Let's see... *you* fantasize about me, and your wife fantasizes about
being married to a man with a brain.

Seems fair.

Call back when you think you have something clever to post.

Oh...haven't heard from your sheriff or whatever yet... :)


Yes, we have. It's in my lawyer's hands. Stay tuned, fat boy.


Uh-huh. Well, I have 57 or 58 posts of yours, with real headers, from
a handful of posters here you have physically threatened. Now, whether
*you* think you have threatened them is not relevant. The authorities
will. Oh...and I wouldn't suggest you use my promise to handle you
appropriately if you engaged in felonious home invasion as a
threat...because such is allowed.

Ta-ta, moron.


Are you for real? What are you two fighting over? Some internet BS?


I'm not fighting. Loogy got himself into a snit because after years of
his throwing insults at a variety of posters here, I threw some back at
him. He didn't like it, and went ape****. Of course, I only insulted his
screen name here, and he takes special care to conceal his actual
identity...

He's a moron.

--
Which one is the girl?

http://tinyurl.com/ycpsnzz