Those damn Canadians..
 

On 3/8/10 9:04 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 8, 8:46 am, wrote:
On 3/8/10 8:37 AM, Eisboch wrote:





"John wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, wrote:

Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H

Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch

Indeed it is.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then leave, fat ass.


BTW, if you are so upset by what you believe to be libelous or
slanderous statements about you, you should be reluctant to make
libelous or slanderous remarks about others.

I'd bet your "lawyer" is unaware of the *fact* that you are one of the
major name callers, libelers and slanderers in rec.boats.

Those damn Canadians..
 

On 3/8/10 9:21 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In articleFvadnRgK3M0JYAnWnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

"John wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, wrote:




Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H



Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch

I beg to differ... Most here have filtered the idiots who annoy us, out. We
(especially Tim) have been making on topic posts and responding to them. We
still have a couple who insist in talking to Harry's room-mate, but really,
they are easy to ignore too.

Scotty



snerk

Those damn Canadians..
 

On Mar 8, 9:25*am, HK wrote:
On 3/8/10 9:04 AM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Mar 8, 8:46 am, *wrote:
On 3/8/10 8:37 AM, Eisboch wrote:

"John * *wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, * *wrote:

Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H

Nope. *I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. * I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch

Indeed it is.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then leave, fat ass.

BTW, if you are so upset by what you believe to be libelous or
slanderous statements about you, you should be reluctant to make
libelous or slanderous remarks about others.

I'd bet your "lawyer" is unaware of the *fact* that you are one of the
major name callers, libelers and slanderers in rec.boats.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pssst, dummy...... YOU have stated that *I* broke my daughter's arms.
That is a CRIME, and if you have, by stating that, and withholding
apparent evidence of such, broken the law. Do I care? No, not really,
if you weren't the nastiest, boorish, lying piece of **** that you
are, I'd probably not do anything. But, seeing how it's not costing me
hardly anything, it'll be worth it having you subpeonaed, facing you
in court in my county, etc.

Those damn Canadians..
 

On 3/8/10 10:30 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 8, 9:25 am, wrote:
On 3/8/10 9:04 AM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Mar 8, 8:46 am, wrote:
On 3/8/10 8:37 AM, Eisboch wrote:

"John wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, wrote:

Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H

Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch

Indeed it is.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then leave, fat ass.

BTW, if you are so upset by what you believe to be libelous or
slanderous statements about you, you should be reluctant to make
libelous or slanderous remarks about others.

I'd bet your "lawyer" is unaware of the *fact* that you are one of the
major name callers, libelers and slanderers in rec.boats.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pssst, dummy...... YOU have stated that *I* broke my daughter's arms.
That is a CRIME, and if you have, by stating that, and withholding
apparent evidence of such, broken the law. Do I care? No, not really,
if you weren't the nastiest, boorish, lying piece of **** that you
are, I'd probably not do anything. But, seeing how it's not costing me
hardly anything, it'll be worth it having you subpeonaed, facing you
in court in my county, etc.


Go tell it to the mountain, asshole.

So, let me get this straight:

Your *private* lawyer is going to prosecute me in a criminal court in
your area? I ask because the other day when I asked why I hadn't heard
from your local sheriff, you said your lawyer was "handling" it.

:)

Those damn Canadians..
 

nom=de=plume wrote:


Oh, except that he never said what his patent was about. So, typing William
McKee patent in google isn't going to find it. See my comment about you
being a fool for additional information.

Oh, and you're a bozo also.

Right. And you're the incompetent patent attorney.
I don't know Bill, and disagree with many of his opinions.
Don't even read all of his posts.
But he has mentioned his disk drive patent more than once here.
Even in this very thread.
Your pettiness has cost you all credibility.
Go soak you head. Or talk to Cannuck.

Those damn Canadians..
 

John H wrote:


Do you know to whom you're responding?

Richard responded to a post with 2 main subjects.

1. Patent searches.
2. The dishonesty of person named calling itself deplum, who claims to
be a patent attorney.

Because Richard had a telling and traumatic experience with patent
attorneys.

What...bothers you he didn't feel like talking about dog puke?
As my big sis used to say, too bad, too sad.
You have no control here, John, except over yourself.
Even Loogy disdains your attempts at control.
Certainly Richard isn't a private in your army.
But your post is amusing and revealing.

Those damn Canadians..
 

Eisboch wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H



Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch



If that's true, you can thank your spoofing friend Jim for driving the
last nail into the coffin lid.
His spoofing of Harry and anybody he can use to get at Harry opened the
spoofing floodgates.
So be it.
Take solace in that a pal is more important than any newsgroup.

Those damn Canadians..
 

In article ,
says...

John H wrote:


Do you know to whom you're responding?

Richard responded to a post with 2 main subjects.

1. Patent searches.
2. The dishonesty of person named calling itself deplum, who claims to
be a patent attorney.

Because Richard had a telling and traumatic experience with patent
attorneys.

What...bothers you he didn't feel like talking about dog puke?
As my big sis used to say, too bad, too sad.
You have no control here, John, except over yourself.
Even Loogy disdains your attempts at control.
Certainly Richard isn't a private in your army.
But your post is amusing and revealing.

plonk slammer, again

Scotty

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

Those damn Canadians..
 

On 3/8/2010 11:50 AM, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and
in others." (Unknown)

John H



Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch


If that's true, you can thank your spoofing friend Jim for driving the
last nail into the coffin lid.
His spoofing of Harry and anybody he can use to get at Harry opened the
spoofing floodgates.
So be it.
Take solace in that a pal is more important than any newsgroup.

It isn't the spoofers that ruined rec.boats, it is all the obnoxious
****z, that post here. They turn every thread into a political post. I
have been telling everyone for years that rec.boats was a disaster and
was on it's death bed. All I have done is try to speed up the process.

Those damn Canadians..
 

On 3/8/10 12:22 PM, Harry wrote:
On 3/8/2010 11:50 AM, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and
in others." (Unknown)

John H



Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch


If that's true, you can thank your spoofing friend Jim for driving the
last nail into the coffin lid.
His spoofing of Harry and anybody he can use to get at Harry opened the
spoofing floodgates.
So be it.
Take solace in that a pal is more important than any newsgroup.

It isn't the spoofers that ruined rec.boats, it is all the obnoxious
****z, that post here. They turn every thread into a political post. I
have been telling everyone for years that rec.boats was a disaster and
was on it's death bed. All I have done is try to speed up the process.


How rich...one of the spoofing assholes claiming his spoofing isn't
ruining what is left of rec.boats...

Nice try, asshole.