On Jan 30, 1:31*am, Tom Francis - SW Sports
wrote:
I couldn't stay away for very long. *So I'm back with a bang. *I was
so impressed with Obama's appearance at the GOP convention that I
wanted to chime in with my $.02

Here's something for Worldnet Daily that gives good insight into how
the GOP handed Obama his behind during the conference.

It was so embarassing for Obama that Fox news cut the feed half way
through the event.

Fox News cut live feed of Obama debate half-way through; GOP aides say
allowing cameras was a 'mistake'

A combative President Obama sparred back and forth with Republicans at
a House GOP retreat in Baltimore Friday, telling House members they
had backed themselves into a corner by painting his administration as
being radical.



Well, I wouldn't say that calling the GOP's actions to be like a
"Bolshevic revolt" would be a good way to win friends and influence
people. Americans dont' like being called or Communists in general,
and people that voted for the GOP, don't like their leaders being
called communists either.

that is unless you are a Communist.

But if so, then what were the reasons behind the Bolshev revolt in
Russia anyhow? I know there are many reasons for it, but from what I
remember it was because people were tired of the eroded rights of the
Russian public, due to the arrogant corruptness of the emperialist
system held by the Nicholas II.

So, I'm wondering which way the comment was meant, but I know how it
can be taken. To blame the republicans are a bunch of communists that
don't seem to tow the administrations line, or that Obama
administration is weak and failing?


I really think the Pres. could, and should have used a different
choice of words.