|
Should Alito resign
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:30 -0800, nom=de=plume wrote:
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is to sit quietly and say/do nothing. I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...s-not-true-at- obama.html Be kind, Alito is having a tough week. Judicial activism is a tough job. I wonder how Harriet Miers would have ruled? ;-) |
Should Alito resign
"thunder" wrote in message
... On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:30 -0800, nom=de=plume wrote: The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is to sit quietly and say/do nothing. I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...s-not-true-at- obama.html Be kind, Alito is having a tough week. Judicial activism is a tough job. I wonder how Harriet Miers would have ruled? ;-) Poor Harriet... -- Nom=de=Plume |
Should Alito resign
In article ,
says... On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:30 -0800, nom=de=plume wrote: The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is to sit quietly and say/do nothing. I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...s-not-true-at- obama.html Be kind, Alito is having a tough week. Judicial activism is a tough job. I wonder how Harriet Miers would have ruled? ;-) Yeah, but don't touch the money that comes from George Soros;) Scotty |
Should Alito resign
On 1/28/10 5:25 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:30 -0800, nom=de=plume wrote: The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is to sit quietly and say/do nothing. I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...s-not-true-at- obama.html Be kind, Alito is having a tough week. Judicial activism is a tough job. I wonder how Harriet Miers would have ruled? ;-) Maybe the same. The Justice was noting the lie Obama told about overseas companies. What lie is that? |
Should Alito resign
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:25:36 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
Maybe the same. The Justice was noting the lie Obama told about overseas companies. It's not hard to see what's going on here, you Democrats want Unions and such to be able to put money in as they support you generally, but other "industries" who do not, you would rather keep them silent in the process. BS. Personally, I'd like to get all the money out of the system, unions and corporations. Our elected officials work for us. They are big enough whores already. We don't need them chasing after all this "new" money. Something you may want to consider, unions do give almost exclusively to Democrats. Corporations tend to hedge their bets, giving to both sides. However, the biggest recipients are incumbents. You do know who controls both Houses and the Whitehouse? It's just another reason incumbents retain their seats 90+% of the time. The only people who should be happy with the High Courts ruling, are the incumbents. |
Should Alito resign
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:25:36 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
Maybe the same. The Justice was noting the lie Obama told about overseas companies. It's not hard to see what's going on here, you Democrats want Unions and such to be able to put money in as they support you generally, but other "industries" who do not, you would rather keep them silent in the process. BS. Personally, I'd like to get all the money out of the system, unions and corporations. Our elected officials work for us. They are big enough whores already. We don't need them chasing after all this "new" money. Something you may want to consider, unions do give almost exclusively to Democrats. Corporations tend to hedge their bets, giving to both sides. However, the biggest recipients are incumbents. You do know who controls both Houses and the Whitehouse? It's just another reason incumbents retain their seats 90+% of the time. The only people who should be happy with the High Courts ruling, are the incumbents. |
Should Alito resign
|
Should Alito resign
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:37:58 -0600, thunder
wrote: On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:30 -0800, nom=de=plume wrote: The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is to sit quietly and say/do nothing. I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...s-not-true-at- obama.html Be kind, Alito is having a tough week. Judicial activism is a tough job. I wonder how Harriet Miers would have ruled? ;-) Horse****, as usual. -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H |
Should Alito resign
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 06:40:48 -0600, thunder
wrote: On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:25:36 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: Maybe the same. The Justice was noting the lie Obama told about overseas companies. It's not hard to see what's going on here, you Democrats want Unions and such to be able to put money in as they support you generally, but other "industries" who do not, you would rather keep them silent in the process. BS. Personally, I'd like to get all the money out of the system, unions and corporations. Our elected officials work for us. They are big enough whores already. We don't need them chasing after all this "new" money. Something you may want to consider, unions do give almost exclusively to Democrats. the fact is unions are almost non existent in the US people prefer that large corporations have the power, not unions |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com