On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:43:03 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 26/01/2010 8:58 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 26, 6:29 am, wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:10:12 -0800, nom=de=plume wrote:
You're just stupid. You're quoting numbers that are totally made up. The
only explanation is lack of intellectual capital.

You're catching on. He likes to make it up as he goes. I don't think
he's made a post that didn't contain factual errors.

Besides that how in hell would ANYONE know what would have happened if
Obama had done something different?

Have jobs?

Reagan could do it. Guess Obama isn't as good. Sure racks up the debt
though.

USAToday had a summary of a survey of 50 economists. the median
estimate is that 1.2million jobs were saved by the stimuluis

of course, the right wing would prefer 25% unemployment...

it took reagan 2 years. this idiot is a CRYBABY

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.co...g-babyism.html


What you have here is big babyism. After the worst downturn in memory,
bequeathed a massive and growing debt, two failing wars, a financial
sector threatening to bring down the entire economy, Obama has
betrayed this person by preventing a Second Great Depression.

We will hear more of these non-sequiturs; the 24-hour news cycle
prevents any memory past the last six months; the easy, lazy meme of
Obama-the-lefty will be pressed home by FNC/RNC and the MSM will grab
onto it because it's a narrative they can understand and that helps
insulate them from charges of bias. That none of this has any direct
relationship with economic and political reality is barely relevant.