I have a dream
 

On Jan 19, 6:51*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article ed36efea-ea78-4b6d-a817-72ef16a700f2@
30g2000yqu.googlegroups.com, says...







On Jan 19, 3:47*pm, C. Mor Butts wrote:
BOSTON (The Borowitz Report) - Firing up voters on the eve of the
special election to fill the late Edward M. Kennedy's Senate seat,
Republican candidate Scott Brown spoke at a campaign rally today,
proclaiming, "With your help, our dream of depriving millions of
health care is within reach."

"Let's send a message, Massachusetts!" Mr. Brown exhorted the crowd.
"Let's tell people across the country that if they want health
coverage, they are **** out of luck!"

An aide to Mr. Brown said that internal polling reveals that the
Republican's anti-healthcare message may be catching on: "Right now,
Scott is showing a double-digit lead among people who describe
themselves as douchebags."

What's funny to me is the fact that when Obama first came on the
scene, the right wing screamed about how he had no experience, etc.
Now we have Brown on the right and the right wing thinks he's just
grand! What has he done? What are his campaign promises? What are his
stands on important issues? Why, it just doesn't matter because he's a
conservative, so he can't do any wrong.

Ut, ohhhh.... I think I smell sour grapes already, give it another hour
till the poles close why don'tcha'?

Scotty- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No sour grapes. Care to answer:

Which of Brown's stances on the important issue do you agree with and
why? Disagree with and why?
Let's start with:

His stance on healthcare
His stance on the economy
His stance on Afghanistan
His stance on terrorism
His stance on global marketing
His stance on the environment.

What? You don't know how he stands on those issue? But you're glad
he's now a Senator?

I have a dream
 

In article d11c8f46-3cf1-4a87-bc89-1c34a1624e63
@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jan 19, 6:51*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article ed36efea-ea78-4b6d-a817-72ef16a700f2@
30g2000yqu.googlegroups.com, says...







On Jan 19, 3:47*pm, C. Mor Butts wrote:
BOSTON (The Borowitz Report) - Firing up voters on the eve of the
special election to fill the late Edward M. Kennedy's Senate seat,
Republican candidate Scott Brown spoke at a campaign rally today,
proclaiming, "With your help, our dream of depriving millions of
health care is within reach."

"Let's send a message, Massachusetts!" Mr. Brown exhorted the crowd.
"Let's tell people across the country that if they want health
coverage, they are **** out of luck!"

An aide to Mr. Brown said that internal polling reveals that the
Republican's anti-healthcare message may be catching on: "Right now,
Scott is showing a double-digit lead among people who describe
themselves as douchebags."

What's funny to me is the fact that when Obama first came on the
scene, the right wing screamed about how he had no experience, etc.
Now we have Brown on the right and the right wing thinks he's just
grand! What has he done? What are his campaign promises? What are his
stands on important issues? Why, it just doesn't matter because he's a
conservative, so he can't do any wrong.

Ut, ohhhh.... I think I smell sour grapes already, give it another hour
till the poles close why don'tcha'?

Scotty- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No sour grapes. Care to answer:

Which of Brown's stances on the important issue do you agree with and
why? Disagree with and why?
Let's start with:

His stance on healthcare
His stance on the economy
His stance on Afghanistan
His stance on terrorism
His stance on global marketing
His stance on the environment.

What? You don't know how he stands on those issue? But you're glad
he's now a Senator?

Who said I don't know? Read my other posts. I know I am wasting my
breath here as you will forget these posts by tomorrow and ask again
next week a different way, but oh well...

BTW... Who are your Senators, and please detail "their" stand on the
above 6 issues. Otherwise, you are still just deflecting and spewing
sour grapes...

Scotty I will be waiting, hopefully Google isn't too clogged up today;)

I have a dream
 

In article ,
says...


Which of Brown's stances on the important issue do you agree with and
why? Disagree with and why?
Let's start with:

His stance on healthcare
His stance on the economy
His stance on Afghanistan
His stance on terrorism
His stance on global marketing
His stance on the environment.

What? You don't know how he stands on those issue? But you're glad
he's now a Senator?

Who said I don't know? Read my other posts. I know I am wasting my
breath here as you will forget these posts by tomorrow and ask again
next week a different way, but oh well...

BTW... Who are your Senators, and please detail "their" stand on the
above 6 issues. Otherwise, you are still just deflecting and spewing
sour grapes...

Scotty I will be waiting, hopefully Google isn't too clogged up today;)

BUMP

I have a dream
 

On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:51:05 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...


Which of Brown's stances on the important issue do you agree with and
why? Disagree with and why?
Let's start with:

His stance on healthcare
His stance on the economy
His stance on Afghanistan
His stance on terrorism
His stance on global marketing
His stance on the environment.

What? You don't know how he stands on those issue? But you're glad
he's now a Senator?

Who said I don't know? Read my other posts. I know I am wasting my
breath here as you will forget these posts by tomorrow and ask again
next week a different way, but oh well...

BTW... Who are your Senators, and please detail "their" stand on the
above 6 issues. Otherwise, you are still just deflecting and spewing
sour grapes...

Scotty I will be waiting, hopefully Google isn't too clogged up today;)

BUMP


I'm thinking PLONK might be a better choice.
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

I have a dream
 

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:51:05 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...


Which of Brown's stances on the important issue do you agree with and
why? Disagree with and why?
Let's start with:

His stance on healthcare
His stance on the economy
His stance on Afghanistan
His stance on terrorism
His stance on global marketing
His stance on the environment.

What? You don't know how he stands on those issue? But you're glad
he's now a Senator?

Who said I don't know? Read my other posts. I know I am wasting my
breath here as you will forget these posts by tomorrow and ask again
next week a different way, but oh well...

BTW... Who are your Senators, and please detail "their" stand on the
above 6 issues. Otherwise, you are still just deflecting and spewing
sour grapes...

Scotty I will be waiting, hopefully Google isn't too clogged up today;)

BUMP


I'm thinking PLONK might be a better choice.

Yeah, I knew he couldn't answer his own questions. It's his game, and I
have been falling for it for years. He asks one question and when you
answer he either:
Ignores the post
dismisses your answer
asks another question... and if you answer the next question... well, I
think you know how it goes. I made an analogy earlier and it seems to
fit well. What most folks don't know about the Couric Palin interview is
the McCain camp gave Couric and her crew a whole day of access, edits
acceptable, etc... If they were smart they would have done as most do.
Two cameras, no prescreened questions, 60 or 90 or whatever minutes and
the promise to air in full with no edits...

Couric just kept peppering Palin all day with patronizing questions and
finally Palin just kind of said "screw it" and blew this idiotic
question off. Turned out edited into a story, that didn't look all that
good... But it still was a "gotcha" trick like Loogie does here all the
time..

Either way, it has taken me a few to catch up and then write this one. I
will look one more time and see if Loog answered his own questions about
his own Senators, or if he is just playing games.. Then I gotta' go to
work;)

Scotty