![]() |
My heart goes out to you liberals...
....who, I'm sure, didn't sleep too well last night.
I watched Olbermann until I got the dry heaves. Seems like he is a real sore loser. I hope he's not representative of the rest of you guys. That man is sick. I'm sure today would be a fun day to listen to the wailing and gnashing of teeth here, but the golf course beckons. After all, the temp is well into the 30's and there's little wind. -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. |
My heart goes out to you liberals...
On Jan 20, 8:40*am, John H wrote:
...who, I'm sure, didn't sleep too well last night. I watched Olbermann until I got the dry heaves. Seems like he is a real sore loser. I hope he's not representative of the rest of you guys. That man is sick. I'm sure today would be a fun day to listen to the wailing and gnashing of teeth here, but the golf course beckons. After all, the temp is well into the 30's and there's little wind. -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. I slept fine. Unlike you, I don't let petty politics run my life. I have to ask, which of the new senator's policies do you like and why? Do you like his stand on the environment? On global warming? On fiscal issues? |
My heart goes out to you liberals...
John H wrote:
...who, I'm sure, didn't sleep too well last night. I watched Olbermann until I got the dry heaves. Seems like he is a real sore loser. I hope he's not representative of the rest of you guys. That man is sick. I'm sure today would be a fun day to listen to the wailing and gnashing of teeth here, but the golf course beckons. After all, the temp is well into the 30's and there's little wind. Fall into a water hazard and drown. |
My heart goes out to you liberals...
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:40:19 -0500, John H
wrote: ...who, I'm sure, didn't sleep too well last night. you might need to send your heart out. if the GOP has it's way, you wont be able to get any medical treatment for it unless you're rich |
My heart goes out to you liberals...
snip
Yes, yes, and yes, because they are good for the country, as opposed to the policies of 'Bama, who is interested only in bigger, less efficient government. Look at downtown Detroit. The mayor is a Democrat. That is a good example of what 'Bama would like this country to become. There, now sleep well. Speaking of Detroit, here's some interesting stats you might want to look at. Eddie City State % of People Below the Poverty Level* 1. Detroit, MI 32.5% 2. Buffalo, NY 29.9% 3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8% 4. Cleveland, OH 27.0% 5. Miami, FL 26.9% 5. St.. Louis, MO 26.8% 7. El Paso, TX 26.4% 8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2% 9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1% 10. Newark, NJ 24.2% What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common? Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961; Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; Cincinnati, OH - (3rd)...since 1984; Cleveland, OH - (4th).....since 1989; Miami, FL - (5th) has never had a Republican mayor; St. Louis, MO - (6th)....since 1949; El Paso, TX - (7th) has never had a Republican mayor; Milwaukee, WI - (8th)....since 1908; Philadelphia, PA - (9th)...since 1952; Newark, NJ - (10th)....since 1907. Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' It is the poor who habitually elect Democrats---yet they are still POOR! "You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves." Abraham Lincoln ............ ................... *U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 |
My heart goes out to you liberals...
Eddie wrote:
snip Yes, yes, and yes, because they are good for the country, as opposed to the policies of 'Bama, who is interested only in bigger, less efficient government. Look at downtown Detroit. The mayor is a Democrat. That is a good example of what 'Bama would like this country to become. There, now sleep well. Speaking of Detroit, here's some interesting stats you might want to look at. Eddie City State % of People Below the Poverty Level* 1. Detroit, MI 32.5% 2. Buffalo, NY 29.9% 3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8% 4. Cleveland, OH 27.0% 5. Miami, FL 26.9% 5. St.. Louis, MO 26.8% 7. El Paso, TX 26.4% 8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2% 9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1% 10. Newark, NJ 24.2% What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common? Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961; Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; Cincinnati, OH - (3rd)...since 1984; Cleveland, OH - (4th).....since 1989; Miami, FL - (5th) has never had a Republican mayor; St. Louis, MO - (6th)....since 1949; El Paso, TX - (7th) has never had a Republican mayor; Milwaukee, WI - (8th)....since 1908; Philadelphia, PA - (9th)...since 1952; Newark, NJ - (10th)....since 1907. Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' It is the poor who habitually elect Democrats---yet they are still POOR! "You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves." Abraham Lincoln ........... .................. *U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 Abe said it pretty good. |
My heart goes out to you liberals...
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:29:31 -0800, Eddie
wrote: snip Yes, yes, and yes, because they are good for the country, as opposed to the policies of 'Bama, who is interested only in bigger, less efficient government. Look at downtown Detroit. The mayor is a Democrat. That is a good example of what 'Bama would like this country to become. There, now sleep well. Speaking of Detroit, here's some interesting stats you might want to look at. Eddie Ever hear the saying about correlation and causation? I'm sure it whisks right by the simple mind. |
My heart goes out to you liberals...
On Jan 21, 2:50*am, jps wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:29:31 -0800, Eddie wrote: snip Yes, yes, and yes, because they are good for the country, as opposed to the policies of 'Bama, who is interested only in bigger, less efficient government. Look at downtown Detroit. The mayor is a Democrat. That is a good example of what 'Bama would like this country to become. There, now sleep well. Speaking of Detroit, here's some interesting stats you might want to look at. Eddie Ever hear the saying about correlation and causation? I'm sure it whisks right by the simple mind. Have you really studied it? I doubt that you have. So, which fits the situation best? |
My heart goes out to you liberals...
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:29:31 -0800, Eddie
wrote: snip Yes, yes, and yes, because they are good for the country, as opposed to the policies of 'Bama, who is interested only in bigger, less efficient government. Look at downtown Detroit. The mayor is a Democrat. That is a good example of what 'Bama would like this country to become. There, now sleep well. Speaking of Detroit, here's some interesting stats you might want to look at. Eddie City State % of People Below the Poverty Level* 1. Detroit, MI 32.5% 2. Buffalo, NY 29.9% 3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8% 4. Cleveland, OH 27.0% 5. Miami, FL 26.9% 5. St.. Louis, MO 26.8% 7. El Paso, TX 26.4% 8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2% 9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1% 10. Newark, NJ 24.2% What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common? Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961; Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; Cincinnati, OH - (3rd)...since 1984; Cleveland, OH - (4th).....since 1989; Miami, FL - (5th) has never had a Republican mayor; St. Louis, MO - (6th)....since 1949; El Paso, TX - (7th) has never had a Republican mayor; Milwaukee, WI - (8th)....since 1908; Philadelphia, PA - (9th)...since 1952; Newark, NJ - (10th)....since 1907. Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' It is the poor who habitually elect Democrats---yet they are still POOR! "You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves." Abraham Lincoln ........... .................. *U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 Very well said. Now some will come and say, 'Yeah, but the state had a Republican governor once." That's what's called a bull**** excuse. -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. |
My heart goes out to you liberals...
|
My heart goes out to you liberals...
I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... ........... .................. *U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 Very well said. Now some will come and say, 'Yeah, but the state had a Republican governor once." That's what's called a bull**** excuse. Like Obama saying "we lost Mass because folks are still ****ed at... Wait for it... Wait for it... President Bush!!! Yes, America is soooooo mad at Bush they voted for a Republican Senator who has promised to slow down Obama's agenda! How foolish and full of **** can one get... Unbefrekinleavable.... Scotty Ya. It'll be Bush's fault when Hussein gets tossed out on his butt. Way to go Bush. |
My heart goes out to you liberals...
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:47:51 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 20/01/2010 4:22 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:40:19 -0500, John H wrote: ...who, I'm sure, didn't sleep too well last night. you might need to send your heart out. if the GOP has it's way, you wont be able to get any medical treatment for it unless you're rich You will not get it you are poor either. But how many have some money can change. The original is not without parallels. In Canada 9/10 provinces have had Liberal/NDP left goverancy for the most of the last 80 years. 1 province has not had a Liberla or NDP government. More jobs without liberals. gee. we have 10% unemployment here, courtesy of right wing freemarket economics. guess you haven't been keeping up with the news |
My heart goes out to you liberals...
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:47:51 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 20/01/2010 4:22 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:40:19 -0500, John H wrote: ...who, I'm sure, didn't sleep too well last night. you might need to send your heart out. if the GOP has it's way, you wont be able to get any medical treatment for it unless you're rich You will not get it you are poor either. But how many have some money can change. The original is not without parallels. In Canada 9/10 provinces have had Liberal/NDP left goverancy for the most of the last 80 years. 1 province has not had a Liberla or NDP government. More jobs without liberals. Less debt without liberals. Less taxes without liberals. Better stanndard of living without liberals. More financial liberty without liberal. Doen't mater how you cut it, the lomer liberalized the worse it gets. You should offeryour heart for a brain. You'd be getting a good deal. |
My heart goes out to you liberals...
On 21/01/2010 6:21 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:47:51 -0700, wrote: On 20/01/2010 4:22 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:40:19 -0500, John H wrote: ...who, I'm sure, didn't sleep too well last night. you might need to send your heart out. if the GOP has it's way, you wont be able to get any medical treatment for it unless you're rich You will not get it you are poor either. But how many have some money can change. The original is not without parallels. In Canada 9/10 provinces have had Liberal/NDP left goverancy for the most of the last 80 years. 1 province has not had a Liberla or NDP government. More jobs without liberals. gee. we have 10% unemployment here, courtesy of right wing freemarket economics. guess you haven't been keeping up with the news It is unfortunate that we do, but it isn't the free markets fault. Blame government for screwing up with huge debt, making the economy a debt mongers dream until the bubble burst. Because this is the whole reason for this entire depression, debt mongering and pandering by our politicians. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com