On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 06:17:19 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 20/01/2010 4:17 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:17:09 -0700,
wrote:


Democrats bit the dust, a hint of what November will bring...

probably right. americans always will vote for politicians who cater
to the rich.


How long was that seat liberal-democrat? 46 years or more? Well, tells
you what people think about Obamanomics, liberal corruption-debt-spend
and liberal health care tax grab.

i love it. this guy thinks obama's been president for 8 years. the
depression started in dec. 2007. guess he forgot bush was president
back then.

I know full well when the depression started, and agree. When Democrat
congress say interest rates invert over inflation, they did squat with
the banks to raise raise rates. It isn't Bush that deterimines interest
rates, this ia congress-federal reserve.

actually congress has zip to do with it. the fed is an independent
institution


But like most liberal debt mongers, they insisted on low rates and to
hell with the pending depression.

Now you have a president that thinks he can debt-bailout-spend his way
out of debt.

a policy developed under bush because the GOP stole SO much money from
the middle class it has zip left to spend

it's no wonder rich incomes increased by over 200% in the last 10
years while middle class incomes went DOWN


Obama's honeymoon just ended with one year in office. One year of
Ombama has democrats voting republican. LMAO.

yep. the american voter will ALWAYS vote to protect the rich.

Yu mean protect themselves. Obamanomics is dangerious, he should have
had the 10 years of his child hood in an American school to learn about
1929. Then he would be less likely to make the same damned misakes.

yeah let's bring back socialism for the rich, like god meant it to be