|
OT This is here, for the moment
|
OT This is here, for the moment
|
OT This is here, for the moment
On 17/01/2010 9:14 AM, John H wrote:
America rising.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZs8k4pJcyk Fantastic video!!!!!!! While liberals have had their Pearl Harbor on the American working people, lets hope like WW II America rises to the occasion and organizes against liberalism, corruption, payolla and democratic bull****. It would be good to revitalize the American spirit of decency, integrity and honor to replace the entitlest rot we have today. But people will have to get off their ass for this one. |
OT This is here, for the moment
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:39:32 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 17/01/2010 9:14 AM, John H wrote: America rising.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZs8k4pJcyk Fantastic video!!!!!!! While liberals have had their Pearl Harbor on the American working people ROFLMAO!! the GOP just plundered middle class 401K's....and this moron thinks obama's been president for 8 years!! HAHAHAHAHAH |
OT This is here, for the moment
On 17/01/2010 9:50 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:39:32 -0700, wrote: On 17/01/2010 9:14 AM, John H wrote: America rising.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZs8k4pJcyk Fantastic video!!!!!!! While liberals have had their Pearl Harbor on the American working people ROFLMAO!! the GOP just plundered middle class 401K's....and this moron thinks obama's been president for 8 years!! HAHAHAHAHAH To a liberal-democrat, they never take ownership of their problems. Lib-dimwit Congress, not Bush controlled the budget. Go figure, congress liked all that waste of money they supported a GOP to get it. LMAO. But a year later, $2 trillion later, 20% rise in DC debt later, Obama/Congress democritters have nothing to show for it but lost jobs, lower wage jobs, threats of higher taxes and lots of rant about grabbing health care moneys for government indisretions and corruption. Who knows, Obama could be called the founder of the new USSR. United States Socialist Republic. Didn't work for the Russians, wonder why lib-dimwits think it will work here? Stupid? |
OT This is here, for the moment
"John H" wrote in message
... America rising.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZs8k4pJcyk -- John H Same crap, different thread. Try to come up with something original for once.. -- Nom=de=Plume |
OT This is here, for the moment
"Canuck57" wrote in message
... On 17/01/2010 9:50 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:39:32 -0700, wrote: On 17/01/2010 9:14 AM, John H wrote: America rising.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZs8k4pJcyk Fantastic video!!!!!!! While liberals have had their Pearl Harbor on the American working people ROFLMAO!! the GOP just plundered middle class 401K's....and this moron thinks obama's been president for 8 years!! HAHAHAHAHAH To a liberal-democrat, they never take ownership of their problems. Lib-dimwit Congress, not Bush controlled the budget. Go figure, congress liked all that waste of money they supported a GOP to get it. LMAO. But a year later, $2 trillion later, 20% rise in DC debt later, Obama/Congress democritters have nothing to show for it but lost jobs, lower wage jobs, threats of higher taxes and lots of rant about grabbing health care moneys for government indisretions and corruption. Who knows, Obama could be called the founder of the new USSR. United States Socialist Republic. Didn't work for the Russians, wonder why lib-dimwits think it will work here? Stupid? Yes, yes you are... -- Nom=de=Plume |
OT This is here, for the moment
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:16:55 -0500, "Anony Mouse" wrote:
"bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:39:32 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: On 17/01/2010 9:14 AM, John H wrote: America rising.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZs8k4pJcyk Fantastic video!!!!!!! While liberals have had their Pearl Harbor on the American working people ROFLMAO!! the GOP just plundered middle class 401K's....and this moron thinks obama's been president for 8 years!! HAHAHAHAHAH Nobody is claiming the GOP has a monopoly on brains, nor that The Anointed One has been president for eight years. ROFLMAO at the ad hominem reaction. uh...you didn't read the thread, did you? the GOP ruined the country. then they blamed it on obama the only way that can happen is if obama was pres for 8 years. newflash to conservatives: he wasn't |
OT This is here, for the moment
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:26:07 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 17/01/2010 9:50 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:39:32 -0700, wrote: On 17/01/2010 9:14 AM, John H wrote: America rising.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZs8k4pJcyk Fantastic video!!!!!!! While liberals have had their Pearl Harbor on the American working people ROFLMAO!! the GOP just plundered middle class 401K's....and this moron thinks obama's been president for 8 years!! HAHAHAHAHAH To a liberal-democrat, they never take ownership of their problems. Lib-dimwit Congress, not Bush controlled the budget. Go figure, congress liked all that waste of money they supported a GOP to get it. LMAO. a nice little fiction from the right wing the president also proposes a budget. you're too stupid to know this and right wingers ran the country for 6 of the last 8 years. so if obama, because he's president, is to blame for this year's faults who is to blame for the last 8? as i said...the right thinks obama's been pres for 8 years But a year later, $2 trillion later, 20% rise in DC debt later, Obama/Congress democritters have nothing to show for it but lost jobs, ?? hey genius it took 10 years for us to get here. obama can't undo iin 1 year what the right did to the country in 10 you guys...dumb as a bag of hammers lower wage jobs, threats of higher taxes and lots of rant about grabbing health care moneys for government indisretions and corruption. you guys have your socialism for the rich paid for by the middle class Who knows, Obama could be called the founder of the new USSR. United States Socialist Republic. Didn't work for the Russians, wonder why lib-dimwits think it will work here? Stupid? we already have socialism you just have to be rich to get it. it's called ' moral hazard'. look it up. bag of hammers... |
OT This is here, for the moment
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:41:49 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . America rising.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZs8k4pJcyk -- John H Same crap, different thread. Try to come up with something original for once.. Glad you enjoyed the show, plum. -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous |
OT This is here, for the moment
"John H" wrote in message
... On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:41:49 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. America rising.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZs8k4pJcyk -- John H Same crap, different thread. Try to come up with something original for once.. Glad you enjoyed the show, plum. You're the one who seems to enjoy crap. -- Nom=de=Plume |
OT This is here, for the moment
On 17/01/2010 12:46 PM, bpuharic wrote:
To a liberal-democrat, they never take ownership of their problems. Lib-dimwit Congress, not Bush controlled the budget. Go figure, congress liked all that waste of money they supported a GOP to get it. LMAO. a nice little fiction from the right wing No fiction. Conservative people tend to rely on themselves more. Let needy. Conservatives are more likely to take ownership of the issues but the liberals tend to ignore them easier. the president also proposes a budget. you're too stupid to know this President can propose anything he wants. But takes congress to approve it. How has that changed? and right wingers ran the country for 6 of the last 8 years. Congress has been democrat since at least 2004. When do they get ownership? 2104? so if obama, because he's president, is to blame for this year's faults Ditto Obama, he entered office with $10.5 trillion in debt and now at $12.5 he has approved $2 trillion of debt-bailout-corruption spending. who is to blame for the last 8? As of inaguration, it was Obama's issue which he has done ZERO to abate it. Just made it worse actually. as i said...the right thinks obama's been pres for 8 years So again, when is Obama responsible? 2108 or 2109? But a year later, $2 trillion later, 20% rise in DC debt later, Obama/Congress democritters have nothing to show for it but lost jobs, ?? hey genius it took 10 years for us to get here. obama can't undo iin 1 year what the right did to the country in 10 Didn't ask Obama to worry about Bush/Democrat congress $3 trillion over 8 years. I want to know why Obama feels the need to debt spend at more than quadrouple the rate! you guys...dumb as a bag of hammers Nope, just chose to see what you wish not to. lower wage jobs, threats of higher taxes and lots of rant about grabbing health care moneys for government indisretions and corruption. you guys have your socialism for the rich paid for by the middle class Signed by a Democrat, LMAO. Bush only gave GM enough to get to Obama...which was peanuts. So if Obama didn't agree and sponsor it, why the hell didn't he force congress to make him do it? Bush didn't, he ceased being the president. Who knows, Obama could be called the founder of the new USSR. United States Socialist Republic. Didn't work for the Russians, wonder why lib-dimwits think it will work here? Stupid? we already have socialism No arguement there. Some amount is good such as K-12 and public roads. Trouble is governmetns realy spend a lot less on common good than they would have you believe. you just have to be rich to get it. it's called ' moral hazard'. look it up. So is moral hazard the democrat justification for screwing up? Or an excuse? How much do we pay for intelligence in our governments? Obviously too damned much for the return. Just another case to farm it out to Walmart. I would vote for Walmart. |
OT This is here, for the moment
"Canuck57" wrote in message
... On 17/01/2010 12:46 PM, bpuharic wrote: To a liberal-democrat, they never take ownership of their problems. Lib-dimwit Congress, not Bush controlled the budget. Go figure, congress liked all that waste of money they supported a GOP to get it. LMAO. a nice little fiction from the right wing No fiction. Conservative people tend to rely on themselves more. Let needy. Conservatives are more likely to take ownership of the issues but the liberals tend to ignore them easier. the president also proposes a budget. you're too stupid to know this President can propose anything he wants. But takes congress to approve it. How has that changed? and right wingers ran the country for 6 of the last 8 years. Congress has been democrat since at least 2004. When do they get ownership? 2104? ?? You're wrong, as usual. http://uspolitics.about.com/od/usgov...l_calendar.htm so if obama, because he's president, is to blame for this year's faults Ditto Obama, he entered office with $10.5 trillion in debt and now at $12.5 he has approved $2 trillion of debt-bailout-corruption spending. Nope. You're wrong again. who is to blame for the last 8? As of inaguration, it was Obama's issue which he has done ZERO to abate it. Just made it worse actually. So, no matter what Bush did, it's now all Obama's fault. Ok kook. as i said...the right thinks obama's been pres for 8 years So again, when is Obama responsible? 2108 or 2109? But a year later, $2 trillion later, 20% rise in DC debt later, Obama/Congress democritters have nothing to show for it but lost jobs, ?? hey genius it took 10 years for us to get here. obama can't undo iin 1 year what the right did to the country in 10 Didn't ask Obama to worry about Bush/Democrat congress $3 trillion over 8 years. I want to know why Obama feels the need to debt spend at more than quadrouple the rate! Probably you don't know much of anything. you guys...dumb as a bag of hammers Nope, just chose to see what you wish not to. Strange lights in the sky? lower wage jobs, threats of higher taxes and lots of rant about grabbing health care moneys for government indisretions and corruption. you guys have your socialism for the rich paid for by the middle class Signed by a Democrat, LMAO. Bush only gave GM enough to get to Obama...which was peanuts. So if Obama didn't agree and sponsor it, why the hell didn't he force congress to make him do it? Bush didn't, he ceased being the president. Force Congress?? At gun point? Who knows, Obama could be called the founder of the new USSR. United States Socialist Republic. Didn't work for the Russians, wonder why lib-dimwits think it will work here? Stupid? we already have socialism No arguement there. Some amount is good such as K-12 and public roads. Trouble is governmetns realy spend a lot less on common good than they would have you believe. Fortunately, you're not here, so you don't have to worry. you just have to be rich to get it. it's called ' moral hazard'. look it up. So is moral hazard the democrat justification for screwing up? Or an excuse? How much do we pay for intelligence in our governments? Obviously too damned much for the return. Just another case to farm it out to Walmart. I would vote for Walmart. I think you should vote for WM. -- Nom=de=Plume |
OT This is here, for the moment
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:33:11 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 17/01/2010 12:46 PM, bpuharic wrote: To a liberal-democrat, they never take ownership of their problems. Lib-dimwit Congress, not Bush controlled the budget. Go figure, congress liked all that waste of money they supported a GOP to get it. LMAO. a nice little fiction from the right wing No fiction. Conservative people tend to rely on themselves more. really? yes, i suppose all those conservative rich folks at goldman sachs, etc. really relied on themselves when they started to tank, didn't they. the rich would NEVER have thought of plundering the middle class to pay for their $6000 umbrella stands. more limbaugh kool aid. Let needy. Conservatives are more likely to take ownership of the issues but the liberals tend to ignore them easier. which is why, i suppose, conservative presidents have been the biggest borrowers in US history the president also proposes a budget. you're too stupid to know this President can propose anything he wants. But takes congress to approve it. How has that changed? and who has to sign the budget? oh, yes, the POTUS. and right wingers ran the country for 6 of the last 8 years. Congress has been democrat since at least 2004. When do they get ownership? 2104? when their policies have been implemented. so far the dems haven't undone the damage the right has caused. the right preached free market fundamentalism for 30 years. how long you think it's gonna take to undo that damage? it's like trying to change the course of a supertanker so if obama, because he's president, is to blame for this year's faults Ditto Obama, he entered office with $10.5 trillion in debt and now at $12.5 he has approved $2 trillion of debt-bailout-corruption spending. to conservatives, the answer is to let unemployment go to 25%. now that the rich are recovering, and the middle class has paid for it, it's time to lay off the middle class. But a year later, $2 trillion later, 20% rise in DC debt later, Obama/Congress democritters have nothing to show for it but lost jobs, ?? hey genius it took 10 years for us to get here. obama can't undo iin 1 year what the right did to the country in 10 Didn't ask Obama to worry about Bush/Democrat congress $3 trillion over 8 years. I want to know why Obama feels the need to debt spend at more than quadrouple the rate! because if he DIDN"T we'd have 25% unemployment instead of 10%. someone has to spend money. that's how this economy operates. if the banks aren't lending and the consumer's not spending, who's left? but you, of course, would just destroy the middle class now that we've paid the bill for the rich |
OT This is here, for the moment
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:33:11 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: On 17/01/2010 12:46 PM, bpuharic wrote: To a liberal-democrat, they never take ownership of their problems. Lib-dimwit Congress, not Bush controlled the budget. Go figure, congress liked all that waste of money they supported a GOP to get it. LMAO. a nice little fiction from the right wing No fiction. Conservative people tend to rely on themselves more. really? yes, i suppose all those conservative rich folks at goldman sachs, etc. really relied on themselves when they started to tank, didn't they. the rich would NEVER have thought of plundering the middle class to pay for their $6000 umbrella stands. more limbaugh kool aid. Let needy. Conservatives are more likely to take ownership of the issues but the liberals tend to ignore them easier. which is why, i suppose, conservative presidents have been the biggest borrowers in US history the president also proposes a budget. you're too stupid to know this President can propose anything he wants. But takes congress to approve it. How has that changed? and who has to sign the budget? oh, yes, the POTUS. and right wingers ran the country for 6 of the last 8 years. Congress has been democrat since at least 2004. When do they get ownership? 2104? when their policies have been implemented. so far the dems haven't undone the damage the right has caused. the right preached free market fundamentalism for 30 years. how long you think it's gonna take to undo that damage? it's like trying to change the course of a supertanker so if obama, because he's president, is to blame for this year's faults Ditto Obama, he entered office with $10.5 trillion in debt and now at $12.5 he has approved $2 trillion of debt-bailout-corruption spending. to conservatives, the answer is to let unemployment go to 25%. now that the rich are recovering, and the middle class has paid for it, it's time to lay off the middle class. But a year later, $2 trillion later, 20% rise in DC debt later, Obama/Congress democritters have nothing to show for it but lost jobs, ?? hey genius it took 10 years for us to get here. obama can't undo iin 1 year what the right did to the country in 10 Didn't ask Obama to worry about Bush/Democrat congress $3 trillion over 8 years. I want to know why Obama feels the need to debt spend at more than quadrouple the rate! because if he DIDN"T we'd have 25% unemployment instead of 10%. someone has to spend money. that's how this economy operates. if the banks aren't lending and the consumer's not spending, who's left? but you, of course, would just destroy the middle class now that we've paid the bill for the rich "Beam me back aboard Scotty; there's no sign of intelligent life here." |
OT This is here, for the moment
On Jan 17, 11:44*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message ... On 17/01/2010 12:46 PM, bpuharic wrote: To a liberal-democrat, they never take ownership of their problems. Lib-dimwit Congress, not Bush controlled the budget. *Go figure, congress liked all that waste of money they supported a GOP to get it.. LMAO. a nice little fiction from the right wing No fiction. *Conservative people tend to rely on themselves more. *Let needy. *Conservatives are more likely to take ownership of the issues but the liberals tend to ignore them easier. the president also proposes a budget. *you're too stupid to know this President can propose anything he wants. *But takes congress to approve it. *How has that changed? and right wingers ran the country for 6 of the last 8 years. Congress has been democrat since at least 2004. *When do they get ownership? *2104? ?? You're wrong, as usual. http://uspolitics.about.com/od/usgov...ssional_calend... so if obama, because he's president, is to blame for this year's faults Ditto Obama, he entered office with $10.5 trillion in debt and now at $12.5 he has approved $2 trillion of debt-bailout-corruption spending. Nope. You're wrong again. who is to blame for the last 8? As of inaguration, it was Obama's issue which he has done ZERO to abate it. *Just made it worse actually. So, no matter what Bush did, it's now all Obama's fault. Ok kook. as i said...the right thinks obama's been pres for 8 years So again, when is Obama responsible? *2108 or 2109? But a year later, $2 trillion later, 20% rise in DC debt later, Obama/Congress democritters have nothing to show for it but lost jobs, ?? hey genius it took 10 years for us to get here. obama can't undo iin 1 year what the right did to the country in 10 Didn't ask Obama to worry about Bush/Democrat congress $3 trillion over 8 years. *I want to know why Obama feels the need to debt spend at more than quadrouple the rate! Probably you don't know much of anything. you guys...dumb as a bag of *hammers Nope, just chose to see what you wish not to. Strange lights in the sky? lower wage jobs, threats of higher taxes and lots of rant about grabbing health care moneys for government indisretions and corruption. you guys have your socialism for the rich paid for by the middle class Signed by a Democrat, LMAO. *Bush only gave GM enough to get to Obama...which was peanuts. *So if Obama didn't agree and sponsor it, why the hell didn't he force congress to make him do it? *Bush didn't, he ceased being the president. Force Congress?? At gun point? Who knows, Obama could be called the founder of the new USSR. *United States Socialist Republic. *Didn't work for the Russians, wonder why lib-dimwits think it will work here? *Stupid? we already have socialism No arguement there. *Some amount is good such as K-12 and public roads. Trouble is governmetns realy spend a lot less on common good than they would have you believe. Fortunately, you're not here, so you don't have to worry. you just have to be rich to get it. it's called 'moralhazard'. look it up. So ismoralhazard the democrat justification for screwing up? *Or an excuse? -- Nom=de=Plume Speaking of "moral hazard" http://abcnews.go.com/2020/John_Edwa...ory?id=9680626 |
OT This is here, for the moment
On Jan 28, 7:31*am, TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 17, 11:44*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Canuck57" wrote in message ... On 17/01/2010 12:46 PM, bpuharic wrote: To a liberal-democrat, they never take ownership of their problems. Lib-dimwit Congress, not Bush controlled the budget. *Go figure, congress liked all that waste of money they supported a GOP to get it. LMAO. a nice little fiction from the right wing No fiction. *Conservative people tend to rely on themselves more. *Let needy. *Conservatives are more likely to take ownership of the issues but the liberals tend to ignore them easier. the president also proposes a budget. *you're too stupid to know this President can propose anything he wants. *But takes congress to approve it. *How has that changed? and right wingers ran the country for 6 of the last 8 years. Congress has been democrat since at least 2004. *When do they get ownership? *2104? ?? You're wrong, as usual. http://uspolitics.about.com/od/usgov...ssional_calend... so if obama, because he's president, is to blame for this year's faults Ditto Obama, he entered office with $10.5 trillion in debt and now at $12.5 he has approved $2 trillion of debt-bailout-corruption spending.. Nope. You're wrong again. who is to blame for the last 8? As of inaguration, it was Obama's issue which he has done ZERO to abate it. *Just made it worse actually. So, no matter what Bush did, it's now all Obama's fault. Ok kook. as i said...the right thinks obama's been pres for 8 years So again, when is Obama responsible? *2108 or 2109? But a year later, $2 trillion later, 20% rise in DC debt later, Obama/Congress democritters have nothing to show for it but lost jobs, ?? hey genius it took 10 years for us to get here. obama can't undo iin 1 year what the right did to the country in 10 Didn't ask Obama to worry about Bush/Democrat congress $3 trillion over 8 years. *I want to know why Obama feels the need to debt spend at more than quadrouple the rate! Probably you don't know much of anything. you guys...dumb as a bag of *hammers Nope, just chose to see what you wish not to. Strange lights in the sky? lower wage jobs, threats of higher taxes and lots of rant about grabbing health care moneys for government indisretions and corruption. you guys have your socialism for the rich paid for by the middle class Signed by a Democrat, LMAO. *Bush only gave GM enough to get to Obama...which was peanuts. *So if Obama didn't agree and sponsor it, why the hell didn't he force congress to make him do it? *Bush didn't, he ceased being the president. Force Congress?? At gun point? Who knows, Obama could be called the founder of the new USSR. *United States Socialist Republic. *Didn't work for the Russians, wonder why lib-dimwits think it will work here? *Stupid? we already have socialism No arguement there. *Some amount is good such as K-12 and public roads. Trouble is governmetns realy spend a lot less on common good than they would have you believe. Fortunately, you're not here, so you don't have to worry. you just have to be rich to get it. it's called 'moralhazard'. look it up. So ismoralhazard the democrat justification for screwing up? *Or an excuse? -- Nom=de=Plume Speaking of "moral hazard" http://abcnews.go.com/2020/John_Edwa...s-made-sex...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh, pity! Wll, at least he didn't plead guilty to toe tapping in an air port bathroom. *rolling eyes* |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com