Harry Reid
 

What ever happened after his terrible remarks?

Harry Reid
 

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:14:30 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:22:34 -0500, Harry
wrote:

What ever happened after his terrible remarks?

To be fair and balanced? A LOT more than what happened to Rush
Limbaugh with his "Barack The Magic Negro" song..... To be fair and
balanced, that is.....

Mitch McConnell was smart enough not to engage in this.... he knows,
historically, this is a lose-lose proposition for the Republicans. How
smart are you?

I find it hilarious that the right wanted to make comparisons and
claim a double-standard with Trent Lott.

They forgot about good ol' boy Trent puting his leg in his mouth on
any number of ocassions and no one being eager to rush to his aid.

Including his own party peers.

Harry Reid
 

Gene wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:22:34 -0500, Harry
wrote:

What ever happened after his terrible remarks?

To be fair and balanced? A LOT more than what happened to Rush
Limbaugh with his "Barack The Magic Negro" song..... To be fair and
balanced, that is.....

Mitch McConnell was smart enough not to engage in this.... he knows,
historically, this is a lose-lose proposition for the Republicans. How
smart are you?

Aparrently not smart enough to be afraid to ask How it's going. Has it
been swept under the rug already. There certainly is a lot of dirt under
that rug, don't you think?

Not much. The dems are rallying around him. It's OK for them to make such comments but if you sit on the other side of the aisle, heaven help you.

Harry Reid
 

"RGrew176" wrote in message
...

'Harry[_2_ Wrote:
;774817']What ever happened after his terrible remarks?

Not much. The dems are rallying around him. It's OK for them to make
such comments but if you sit on the other side of the aisle, heaven
help you.


Come on... he said something in a clumsy way that's probably got some truth
to it. He's got a long history of civil rights.

I think what Clinton said (about serving coffee) was much more
mean-spirited, and he should have known better.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Harry Reid
 

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:41:38 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


'Harry[_2_ Wrote:
;774817']What ever happened after his terrible remarks?

Not much. The dems are rallying around him. It's OK for them to make
such comments but if you sit on the other side of the aisle, heaven
help you.

Trent Lott was a serial asshole and that's the best example the
Republicans can muster.

Says it all.

Harry Reid
 

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:22:34 -0500, Harry
wrote:

What ever happened after his terrible remarks?

To be fair and balanced? A LOT more than what happened to Rush
Limbaugh with his "Barack The Magic Negro" song..... To be fair and
balanced, that is.....

To be even further fair and balanced you can castigate the LA Times for
originating "Barak the Magic Negro"

Mitch McConnell was smart enough not to engage in this.... he knows,
historically, this is a lose-lose proposition for the Republicans. How
smart are you?

I guess it is ok for Democrats to be racists, in the name of fairness
and balance. They, the Democrats, are the party of slavery, the KKK,
segregation and other atrocious actions and activities against the non-
whites.

Harry Reid
 

BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:22:34 -0500, Harry
wrote:

What ever happened after his terrible remarks?
To be fair and balanced? A LOT more than what happened to Rush
Limbaugh with his "Barack The Magic Negro" song..... To be fair and
balanced, that is.....

To be even further fair and balanced you can castigate the LA Times for
originating "Barak the Magic Negro"

Mitch McConnell was smart enough not to engage in this.... he knows,
historically, this is a lose-lose proposition for the Republicans. How
smart are you?

I guess it is ok for Democrats to be racists, in the name of fairness
and balance. They, the Democrats, are the party of slavery, the KKK,
segregation and other atrocious actions and activities against the non-
whites.



And that's why so many Americans of color showed up and were welcomed at
the 2008 Republican National Convention, and why there are so many
American politicians of color who are Republicans.

Read up on the Southern Strategy.


--
Where others have hearts, right-wingers carry tumors of rotten principles.

Harry Reid
 

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:16:32 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"RGrew176" wrote in message
...

'Harry[_2_ Wrote:
;774817']What ever happened after his terrible remarks?

Not much. The dems are rallying around him. It's OK for them to make
such comments but if you sit on the other side of the aisle, heaven
help you.


Come on... he said something in a clumsy way that's probably got some
truth
to it. He's got a long history of civil rights.

I think what Clinton said (about serving coffee) was much more
mean-spirited, and he should have known better.


I agree. Reid probably talks a lot more candidly around his white
friends back in Nevada and this just slipped out. It wasn't really
that long ago that Nevada was Jim Crow. About as long ago as Alabama.


I don't think it was a matter of being more or less candid. I think it was
just a poor choice of words. If you're in someone's mobile home, would you
go out of your way to claim that the white trash who live in trailer are
more prone to tornado attacks or would you say that people who live in
mobile homes are more prone to tornado attacks? See the difference. He was
inarticulate.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Harry Reid
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:41:38 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


'Harry[_2_ Wrote:
;774817']What ever happened after his terrible remarks?

Not much. The dems are rallying around him. It's OK for them to make
such comments but if you sit on the other side of the aisle, heaven
help you.

Trent Lott was a serial asshole and that's the best example the
Republicans can muster.

Says it all.


Pretty much does.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Harry Reid
 

On Jan 13, 2:16*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"RGrew176" wrote in message

...



'Harry[_2_ Wrote:
;774817']What ever happened after his terrible remarks?

Not much. The dems are rallying around him. It's OK for them to make
such comments but if you sit on the other side of the aisle, heaven
help you.

Come on... he said something in a clumsy way that's probably got some truth
to it. He's got a long history of civil rights.

I think what Clinton said (about serving coffee) was much more
mean-spirited, and he should have known better.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But what Clinton said wasn't racist. He said it meaning that Obama
didn't have the experience that others had.

Harry Reid
 

Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 13, 2:16 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"RGrew176" wrote in message

...



'Harry[_2_ Wrote:
;774817']What ever happened after his terrible remarks?
Not much. The dems are rallying around him. It's OK for them to make
such comments but if you sit on the other side of the aisle, heaven
help you.
Come on... he said something in a clumsy way that's probably got some truth
to it. He's got a long history of civil rights.

I think what Clinton said (about serving coffee) was much more
mean-spirited, and he should have known better.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But what Clinton said wasn't racist. He said it meaning that Obama
didn't have the experience that others had.

Nah. If it was a racist remark, Harry would be all over it like stink on
****. It was a mere slip of the tongue.

Harry Reid
 

On Jan 13, 3:59*pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 13, 2:16 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"RGrew176" wrote in message

...

'Harry[_2_ Wrote:
;774817']What ever happened after his terrible remarks?
Not much. The dems are rallying around him. It's OK for them to make
such comments but if you sit on the other side of the aisle, heaven
help you.
Come on... he said something in a clumsy way that's probably got some truth
to it. He's got a long history of civil rights.

I think what Clinton said (about serving coffee) was much more
mean-spirited, and he should have known better.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But what Clinton said wasn't racist. He said it meaning that Obama
didn't have the experience that others had.

Nah. If it was a racist remark, Harry would be all over it like stink on
****. It was a mere slip of the tongue.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Nah, like some on the right, Harry only sees one narrow left side of
anything.

Harry Reid
 

"Loogypicker" wrote in message
...
On Jan 13, 2:16 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"RGrew176" wrote in message

...



'Harry[_2_ Wrote:
;774817']What ever happened after his terrible remarks?

Not much. The dems are rallying around him. It's OK for them to make
such comments but if you sit on the other side of the aisle, heaven
help you.

Come on... he said something in a clumsy way that's probably got some
truth
to it. He's got a long history of civil rights.

I think what Clinton said (about serving coffee) was much more
mean-spirited, and he should have known better.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But what Clinton said wasn't racist. He said it meaning that Obama
didn't have the experience that others had.


I didn't say it was racist, although it has those overtones. I was
mean-spirited, which is not out of order for him.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Harry Reid
 

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:46:30 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:22:34 -0500, Harry
wrote:

What ever happened after his terrible remarks?

To be fair and balanced? A LOT more than what happened to Rush
Limbaugh with his "Barack The Magic Negro" song..... To be fair and
balanced, that is.....

To be even further fair and balanced you can castigate the LA Times for
originating "Barak the Magic Negro"

Mitch McConnell was smart enough not to engage in this.... he knows,
historically, this is a lose-lose proposition for the Republicans. How
smart are you?

I guess it is ok for Democrats to be racists, in the name of fairness
and balance. They, the Democrats, are the party of slavery, the KKK,
segregation and other atrocious actions and activities against the non-
whites.

One slip by Reid and you're ready for the cross burning but a lifetime
of Trent Lott's purposeful hatred is the best the Republicans have for
comaprison?