|
Texas Taliban
thunder wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:54:36 -0500, Harry wrote: I inherited a couple of fundie relatives, a young couple, who are home schooling their kids not because they think they can offer them a better education, but to keep them from "mixing" with kids whose parents are more moderate and liberal. Their words. In other words, they want to raise isolated automatons. Wish them luck. It rarely works out that way. Unless you lock them in a closet, kids tend to find their own way. I sure hope so. The husband of the couple in question is a fundie minister. The kids are only allowed to socialize with kids of other congregation members. Scary stuff, right out of the Taliban playbook, if there is a Taliban playbook. |
Texas Taliban
wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:35:30 -0500, Harry wrote: wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:32:27 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:50:03 -0600, wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:33:26 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:28:25 -0600, wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:59:18 -0500, Gene wrote: snipped for brevity Your bigotry is showing. Secular vs. non-secular is not an issue beyond some weighted geographic issues.... The vinegar bottle is an equal opportunity depriver... You taught your daughter. I've taught hundreds of folks in the last few decades. You are certainly entitled to your opinion, but you lack depth of experience. And you have homeschooled for an appreciable time? Yes, I have, and my son attended both a private school and a Baptist Academy for several years. In addition to all of that..... I have learned from my mistakes...... I judge, from your posts, that you haven't. You judge poorly then. I have never homeschooled. Well... that explains a LOT..... again, you are waxing eloquent about a subject you have no knowledge or personal experience. I thought you were an idiot..... I didn't realize you just didn't know what you were talking about..... OK...... I'm good..... The sensible and honest reader will note that I have refrained from making any statements of fact that would lead one to believe that the author of these lines is an expert in homeschooling. In fact, I doubt that a challenge to corroborate such an assertion would yield much evidence that this humble person made any statements of fact in this regard. What this person did do, aside from making a few meager inquiries, was to illustrate the poor thinking of a pontificating, ultra-resplendent academician. And it would appear from the knee-jerk response of the Infallible Erudite from the Great Halls of Conceit, that the sting of that illustration was...tangible. Wow! I thought Spiro T. Agnew passed in 1996, but perhaps you are channeling him... No meager inquiries, in fact, you admitted to being condescending. If fact appears to you as pontification and academia offends you as being too intellectual, please feel comfortable in your liberal yet parochial views. You will surely find comfort as others, here, have posted with respect to the evils of intellectuals, so you should be able to find many soul mates.... I didn't note any illustration, but if the images in your mind give your comfort, please enjoy them. In the future, please let me know if you are responding with eloquent verbiage, rather than any experience or knowledge on the subject. It will greatly enhance the reader's experience..... Generally, I prefer to have discourse with folks that have knowledge of a subject, rather than a patter of magical words... Who's going to permit you to find refuge in the red herring? There is nothing to suggest that I'm anti-intellectual in any of this discourse. What should be obvious, even to you, is that I oppose conceit. Experience is not the issue when you have served up a game of feigned intellectualism replete with examples of poor thinking. Are you able to redeem yourself? To put the onus on lack of experience is disingenuous, when the term itself is broad and generic. If my experience is in the dialectic, do you bear the conceit to deny it? All you have to do to play your game is to put the focus on my verbiage. You, my conceited fellow, are in error. Frankly, you have nothing to offer but overblown "verbiage." Then I would suggest that you have limited experience in comprehension. You can suggest whatever you wish, but that doesn't mean your suggestions are worthy of consideration. I've read enough of the overblown, overwritten crap you post here to know there's nothing there, and that includes a critical discussion of ideas. Frankly, in terms of usenet discussions, you remind me of a gaseous anomaly, i.e., someone who is always farting or burping. -- Where others have hearts, right-wingers carry tumors of rotten principles. |
Texas Taliban
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:09:49 -0500, Gene
wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:55:12 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message . .. On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote: The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not exclusive to the gay population. You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is so abundant, I won't even go there. Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately express themselves. Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved "down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered, and straight..... Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh? . I'm not ASSUMING anything. You weren't forced to be there. It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in PUBLIC. They didn't. It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at the museums.... it was WRONG. I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE. It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it. Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine..... The explanation is... some people are a bit strange. If a child asks a direct question at that age, they should get as direct an answer as possible. OK, so humor me.... two chicks, leather, thigh high stilettos, leash, studded collar, and crop. Couple reaches a cross street and waits for traffic. Domme gets sub on her knees for a little show-off licky-licky.... shoot, it just ain't no fun if everybody isn't able to watch, now is it? So, Dad, what sort of direct answer have you got to explain that to a kid? Yeah...... thought so...... You make a damn good point. The gay trash is hurting the cause of all gays. You shouldn't have to explain to an eight-year old the 'show off licky-licky' of two adults on a sidewalk in DC. Hopefully, the folks in DC will get to vote on the gay marriage proposal and put it where it belongs. Maybe that'll spread the word to the gay 'licky-licky' folks that their mores aren't welcome on the mall, or anywhere out of their bedrooms. -- America needs Obamacare like Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask or slammer's hemorrhoids.. John H |
Texas Taliban
John H wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:09:49 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:55:12 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote: The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not exclusive to the gay population. You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is so abundant, I won't even go there. Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately express themselves. Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved "down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered, and straight..... Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh? . I'm not ASSUMING anything. You weren't forced to be there. It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in PUBLIC. They didn't. It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at the museums.... it was WRONG. I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE. It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it. Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine..... The explanation is... some people are a bit strange. If a child asks a direct question at that age, they should get as direct an answer as possible. OK, so humor me.... two chicks, leather, thigh high stilettos, leash, studded collar, and crop. Couple reaches a cross street and waits for traffic. Domme gets sub on her knees for a little show-off licky-licky.... shoot, it just ain't no fun if everybody isn't able to watch, now is it? So, Dad, what sort of direct answer have you got to explain that to a kid? Yeah...... thought so...... You make a damn good point. The gay trash is hurting the cause of all gays. You shouldn't have to explain to an eight-year old the 'show off licky-licky' of two adults on a sidewalk in DC. Hopefully, the folks in DC will get to vote on the gay marriage proposal and put it where it belongs. Maybe that'll spread the word to the gay 'licky-licky' folks that their mores aren't welcome on the mall, or anywhere out of their bedrooms. Where others have hearts, Herring carries tumors of rotten principles. |
Texas Taliban
mgg wrote:
"Gene" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:55:12 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote: The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not exclusive to the gay population. You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is so abundant, I won't even go there. Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately express themselves. Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved "down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered, and straight..... Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh? . I'm not ASSUMING anything. You weren't forced to be there. It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in PUBLIC. They didn't. It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at the museums.... it was WRONG. I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE. It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it. Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine..... The explanation is... some people are a bit strange. If a child asks a direct question at that age, they should get as direct an answer as possible. OK, so humor me.... two chicks, leather, thigh high stilettos, leash, studded collar, and crop. Couple reaches a cross street and waits for traffic. Domme gets sub on her knees for a little show-off licky-licky.... shoot, it just ain't no fun if everybody isn't able to watch, now is it? So, Dad, what sort of direct answer have you got to explain that to a kid? Yeah...... thought so...... That's why we don't take our kids to San Francisco. harry seems to like it there though. ;-) --Mike I approve this post |
Texas Taliban
Gene wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:39:27 -0800, "mgg" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:55:12 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote: The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not exclusive to the gay population. You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is so abundant, I won't even go there. Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately express themselves. Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved "down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered, and straight..... Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh? . I'm not ASSUMING anything. You weren't forced to be there. It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in PUBLIC. They didn't. It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at the museums.... it was WRONG. I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE. It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it. Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine..... The explanation is... some people are a bit strange. If a child asks a direct question at that age, they should get as direct an answer as possible. OK, so humor me.... two chicks, leather, thigh high stilettos, leash, studded collar, and crop. Couple reaches a cross street and waits for traffic. Domme gets sub on her knees for a little show-off licky-licky.... shoot, it just ain't no fun if everybody isn't able to watch, now is it? So, Dad, what sort of direct answer have you got to explain that to a kid? Yeah...... thought so...... That's why we don't take our kids to San Francisco. harry seems to like it there though. ;-) --Mike I've been to SF and I know it has a large gay population. Personally, I haven't seen them showing their *ss, but I guess that doesn't mean they don't. I'm not a homophobe. I have gay friends. I have gay friends that I would trust as babysitters, but that doesn't describe all gay folks. I stand by my original position. You were lucky. |
Texas Taliban
Harry wrote:
We've seen gay couples in San Franciso, just as we've seen them in New York, DC, LA, New Orleans, Miami, and even at...Disney World. A few act a bit strangely in public, but most do not. So what? I think my oldest kid was about five when we took our first family vacation to California. We saw some gay couples then...and explained that some women date women and some men date men. No biggie. |
Texas Taliban
|
Texas Taliban
Harry wrote:
wrote: On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:35:30 -0500, Harry wrote: Frankly, you have nothing to offer but overblown "verbiage." Then I would suggest that you have limited experience in comprehension. BINGO Ahhh...flajim or loogy or whoever made it through another night to ID spoof yet again. Yawn. -- Where others have hearts, right-wingers carry tumors of rotten principles. |
Texas Taliban
Harry wrote:
Frankly, in terms of usenet discussions, you remind me of a gaseous anomaly, i.e., someone who is always farting or burping. Folks. Here is an example of my finest work. I offer it to you as a token to remember your humble servant Harry Krause. Go in peace. |
Texas Taliban
Harry wrote:
Where others have hearts, XXXXXXX carries tumors of rotten principles. Pure poetry. I am so proud of this one. |
Texas Taliban
Harry wrote:
Harry wrote: We've seen gay couples in San Franciso, just as we've seen them in New York, DC, LA, New Orleans, Miami, and even at...Disney World. A few act a bit strangely in public, but most do not. So what? I think my oldest kid was about five when we took our first family vacation to California. We saw some gay couples then...and explained that some women date women and some men date men. No biggie. To this day I cant figure out why the kid didn't ask more questions. I guess I should be happy that my kid learned to use a knife and fork to eat with in special school. |
Texas Taliban
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Gene" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:28:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:55:12 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote: The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not exclusive to the gay population. You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is so abundant, I won't even go there. Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately express themselves. Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved "down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered, and straight..... Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh? . I'm not ASSUMING anything. You weren't forced to be there. It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in PUBLIC. They didn't. It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at the museums.... it was WRONG. I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE. It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it. Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine..... The explanation is... some people are a bit strange. If a child asks a direct question at that age, they should get as direct an answer as possible. OK, so humor me.... two chicks, leather, thigh high stilettos, leash, studded collar, and crop. Couple reaches a cross street and waits for traffic. Domme gets sub on her knees for a little show-off licky-licky.... shoot, it just ain't no fun if everybody isn't able to watch, now is it? So, Dad, what sort of direct answer have you got to explain that to a kid? Yeah...... thought so...... "Some people are a bit strange." Do you think that's a wrong answer? A wrong answer? No. Not, if you could get away with that, good for you. I'm just wondering if that wouldn't just mitigate the inevitable follow up questions you'd get. :) I can assure you that would never have satisfied my kid...... nor me, when I was his age........ If you can befuddle your kid with.... they ain't like us..... good on you, but around our household, that wouldn't buy you 15 seconds to come up with the next half-truth...... What do you think the next question would be? I'm sure your kid wouldn't have a second question. If he/she had even half a brain he/she would not probe your mind for intelligence. |
Texas Taliban
Harry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: I'm sure your kid wouldn't have a second question. If he/she had even half a brain he/she would not probe your mind for intelligence. Jim thinks he's fooling posters by spoofing my ID. D'oh. -- Where others have hearts, right-wingers carry tumors of rotten principles. |
Texas Taliban
jps wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:35:51 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote: The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not exclusive to the gay population. You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is so abundant, I won't even go there. Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately express themselves. Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved "down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered, and straight..... Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh? . I'm not ASSUMING anything. You weren't forced to be there. It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in PUBLIC. They didn't. It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at the museums.... it was WRONG. I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE. It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it. Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine..... What was happening went right over your 8 year old's head. You could have swept it aside in a moments notice by telling your kid that they were play acting and just having silly fun. Your kid would have thought nothing more of it. You avoid tough questions by lying to your kid? Aint that speshulll. My wife managed the campaign of an openly gay state rep in California several years ago and both our pre-10 year olds marched in the local parade next to drag queens and transvestites. We've chosen to expose them to all sorts of people and not seed fearful complexes (like yours). You have chosen to expose your kids to these sickos without so much as a heads up as to what these folks are into. Aint that speshulll They also go to school with African Americans, 16 different flavors of Asians, Indians, Arabs, North Africans, etc., etc. 16 flavors. That's a wonderful way to categorize people of different cultures. You are speshulll They're completely normal kids with a broader range of understanding and empathy because of it. I wouldn't trust your definition of normal. I'm sure you'd like them, even if you can't appreciate the leanings of their father. Could be. What's astonishing to me is that you find gays a more frightening influence than guns. I wonder what influenced you to make that statement. It seems to be quite bizarre to me. I guess inanimate things are easier for you to deal with. Yawn Your buddie, Harieeee. |
Texas Taliban
Harry wrote:
Harry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: I'm sure your kid wouldn't have a second question. If he/she had even half a brain he/she would not probe your mind for intelligence. Jim thinks he's fooling posters by spoofing my ID. D'oh. Watch for a disgustingly sig line to identify a spoofer. -- If it's not posted with a mac, it's the real deal. |
Texas Taliban
|
Texas Taliban
"jps" wrote in message
... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:14:57 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message . .. On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:28:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message m... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:55:12 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message news:6hbqk592jtl7o2e9t6j12alj1jb6bu3hlt@4ax. com... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote: The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not exclusive to the gay population. You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is so abundant, I won't even go there. Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately express themselves. Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved "down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered, and straight..... Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh? . I'm not ASSUMING anything. You weren't forced to be there. It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in PUBLIC. They didn't. It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at the museums.... it was WRONG. I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE. It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it. Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine..... The explanation is... some people are a bit strange. If a child asks a direct question at that age, they should get as direct an answer as possible. OK, so humor me.... two chicks, leather, thigh high stilettos, leash, studded collar, and crop. Couple reaches a cross street and waits for traffic. Domme gets sub on her knees for a little show-off licky-licky.... shoot, it just ain't no fun if everybody isn't able to watch, now is it? So, Dad, what sort of direct answer have you got to explain that to a kid? Yeah...... thought so...... "Some people are a bit strange." Do you think that's a wrong answer? A wrong answer? No. Not, if you could get away with that, good for you. I'm just wondering if that wouldn't just mitigate the inevitable follow up questions you'd get. :) I can assure you that would never have satisfied my kid...... nor me, when I was his age........ If you can befuddle your kid with.... they ain't like us..... good on you, but around our household, that wouldn't buy you 15 seconds to come up with the next half-truth...... What do you think the next question would be? Something he's afraid he couldn't handle. Some people are better suited to parenting than others. I'm not casting aspersions. I was just curious. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Texas Taliban
"John H" wrote in message
... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:09:49 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:55:12 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote: The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not exclusive to the gay population. You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is so abundant, I won't even go there. Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately express themselves. Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved "down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered, and straight..... Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh? . I'm not ASSUMING anything. You weren't forced to be there. It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in PUBLIC. They didn't. It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at the museums.... it was WRONG. I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE. It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it. Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine..... The explanation is... some people are a bit strange. If a child asks a direct question at that age, they should get as direct an answer as possible. OK, so humor me.... two chicks, leather, thigh high stilettos, leash, studded collar, and crop. Couple reaches a cross street and waits for traffic. Domme gets sub on her knees for a little show-off licky-licky.... shoot, it just ain't no fun if everybody isn't able to watch, now is it? So, Dad, what sort of direct answer have you got to explain that to a kid? Yeah...... thought so...... You make a damn good point. The gay trash is hurting the cause of all gays. You shouldn't have to explain to an eight-year old the 'show off licky-licky' of two adults on a sidewalk in DC. Hopefully, the folks in DC will get to vote on the gay marriage proposal and put it where it belongs. Maybe that'll spread the word to the gay 'licky-licky' folks that their mores aren't welcome on the mall, or anywhere out of their bedrooms. -- Sort of like white trash hurting the cause of all whites? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Texas Taliban
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:09:49 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:55:12 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote: The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not exclusive to the gay population. You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is so abundant, I won't even go there. Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately express themselves. Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved "down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered, and straight..... Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh? . I'm not ASSUMING anything. You weren't forced to be there. It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in PUBLIC. They didn't. It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at the museums.... it was WRONG. I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE. It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it. Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine..... The explanation is... some people are a bit strange. If a child asks a direct question at that age, they should get as direct an answer as possible. OK, so humor me.... two chicks, leather, thigh high stilettos, leash, studded collar, and crop. Couple reaches a cross street and waits for traffic. Domme gets sub on her knees for a little show-off licky-licky.... shoot, it just ain't no fun if everybody isn't able to watch, now is it? So, Dad, what sort of direct answer have you got to explain that to a kid? Yeah...... thought so...... You make a damn good point. The gay trash is hurting the cause of all gays. You shouldn't have to explain to an eight-year old the 'show off licky-licky' of two adults on a sidewalk in DC. Hopefully, the folks in DC will get to vote on the gay marriage proposal and put it where it belongs. Maybe that'll spread the word to the gay 'licky-licky' folks that their mores aren't welcome on the mall, or anywhere out of their bedrooms. -- Sort of like white trash hurting the cause of all whites? Yeeeeouch! You just pinned the tail on herring. |
Texas Taliban
On Jan 12, 8:32*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/01/2010 5:53 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: A parent has a choice to home-school, given certain requirements. Children don't typically have a legal voice of their own. They must usually be represented by an adult. It's in the best interest of society for the population to be educated. I suppose you disagree with this. And given how people make excuses, and get away with it. *Might as well repeal the requirements. BTW, I think all children should be going physically to a school unless circumstances are abobiously unavoidable. *Such as a family on an island manning a lighthouse and the nearest school is 100 miles away. Chop the squakers hair and march to school... Such as a family on an island manning a lighthouse and the nearest school is 100 miles away. Well, kids in the Outback of Australia take their schooling via Computer link up. |
Texas Taliban
On Jan 12, 8:33*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:06:08 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:56:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message . .. On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:03:04 -0800, jps wrote: MESQUITE, Texas - The parents of a 4-year-old boy disciplined for having long hair have rejected a compromise from a Texas school board that agreed to adjust its grooming policy. The impasse means pre-kindergartner Taylor Pugh will remain in in-school suspension, sitting alone with a teacher's aide in a library. He has been sequestered from classmates at Floyd Elementary School in Mesquite, a Dallas suburb, since late November. After a closed-door meeting Monday, the Mesquite school board decided the boy could wear his hair in tight braids but keep it no longer than his ears. But his parents say the adjustment isn't enough for Taylor, who wears his hair long, covering his earlobes and shirt collar. His mother, Elizabeth Taylor, said she'll pull back Taylor's hair in a ponytail, acknowledging the style will keep him suspended. According to the district dress code, boys' hair must be kept out of the eyes and cannot extend below the bottom of earlobes or over the collar of a dress shirt. Fads in hairstyles "designed to attract attention to the individual or to disrupt the orderly conduct of the classroom or campus is not permitted," the policy states. The district is known for standing tough on its dress code. Last year, a seventh-grader was sent home for wearing black skinny pants. His parents chose to home-school him. On its Web site, the district says its code is in place because "students who dress and groom themselves neatly, and in an acceptable and appropriate manner, are more likely to become constructive members of the society in which we live." Taylor said her fight is not over. She and her husband are considering taking the district to court or appealing to the State Board of Education. "I know that there are a whole set of steps we can take," she said. God forbid individualism. *That's too American for Texas. I'm sure that kid's long hair is preventing all of the other 4 year olds from learning..... but, then..... it becomes all to obvious when education is tossed in deference to indoctrination.... That's right! Another example - gay marriage preventing hetero couples from enjoying their relationships! Biggest problem with gay.... well most anything.... is that it is so IN-YOUR-FACE. I wouldn't, as a hetero, expect to display my sexuality like this in public. I don't need to see this, my kids don't need to see this, and my grand kids don't need to see this. Frankly, it gets MUCH worse than this.... whips, chains, leashes, Corinthian leather.... fine.... keep it to yourself... http://tinyurl.com/yrohxb Sorry, can't transmit mindbleach through the net..... The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not exclusive to the gay population. Take Mrs. Herring for example. *She's clearly into masochism, she probably just doesn't dress up. .....but Herring does. Maybe he was a Fan of Hoover.... That guy was a real " Queen". |
Texas Taliban
On Jan 12, 9:58*pm, Harry wrote:
I am Tosk wrote: * When I home schooled my daughter for two years Holy schitt...are no qualifications necessary to home school someone? -- Where others have hearts, right-wingers carry tumors of rotten principles.. Well, Ingerfool had to stand OUTside the fence at the School. He isn't allowed on the grounds due to his affliction with spending weekends in a Tent with young girls. |
Texas Taliban
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:44:05 -0800, jps wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:35:51 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote: The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not exclusive to the gay population. You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is so abundant, I won't even go there. Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately express themselves. Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved "down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered, and straight..... Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh? . I'm not ASSUMING anything. You weren't forced to be there. It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in PUBLIC. They didn't. It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at the museums.... it was WRONG. I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE. It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it. Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine..... What was happening went right over your 8 year old's head. You could have swept it aside in a moments notice by telling your kid that they were play acting and just having silly fun. Your kid would have thought nothing more of it. My wife managed the campaign of an openly gay state rep in California several years ago and both our pre-10 year olds marched in the local parade next to drag queens and transvestites. We've chosen to expose them to all sorts of people and not seed fearful complexes (like yours). They also go to school with African Americans, 16 different flavors of Asians, Indians, Arabs, North Africans, etc., etc. They're completely normal kids with a broader range of understanding and empathy because of it. I'm sure you'd like them, even if you can't appreciate the leanings of their father. What's astonishing to me is that you find gays a more frightening influence than guns. I guess inanimate things are easier for you to deal with. Hello? Gene? You there Gene? |
Texas Taliban
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:55:59 -0500, Harry
wrote: mgg wrote: "Gene" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:55:12 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote: The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not exclusive to the gay population. You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is so abundant, I won't even go there. Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately express themselves. Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved "down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered, and straight..... Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh? . I'm not ASSUMING anything. You weren't forced to be there. It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in PUBLIC. They didn't. It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at the museums.... it was WRONG. I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE. It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it. Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine..... The explanation is... some people are a bit strange. If a child asks a direct question at that age, they should get as direct an answer as possible. OK, so humor me.... two chicks, leather, thigh high stilettos, leash, studded collar, and crop. Couple reaches a cross street and waits for traffic. Domme gets sub on her knees for a little show-off licky-licky.... shoot, it just ain't no fun if everybody isn't able to watch, now is it? So, Dad, what sort of direct answer have you got to explain that to a kid? Yeah...... thought so...... That's why we don't take our kids to San Francisco. harry seems to like it there though. ;-) --Mike Indeed, Mikey, I'm not ambivalent or nervous about my heterosexuality, and I'm not put off or made nervous by "gays." Gays are part of every vibrant community, whereas closed-minded homophobes like you are not. My wife and I love San Francisco. It is a beautiful city, with great architecture, old and new; livable neighborhoods everywhere, terrific restaurants, great meeting places, interesting shops, museums, whatever. Like every big city, it has its problems, but as tourists they don't impact us very much. We've seen gay couples in San Franciso, just as we've seen them in New York, DC, LA, New Orleans, Miami, and even at...Disney World. A few act a bit strangely in public, but most do not. So what? I think my oldest kid was about five when we took our first family vacation to California. We saw some gay couples then...and explained that some women date women and some men date men. No biggie. You mentioned you send your kids to Catholic schools. Now *that* might be a major concern, what with all the pedophilia running rampant in those places, eh? I hope San Francisco's reputation helps keep these close-minded idiots at a distance. Better for the city, its culture and its fans. His kids are likely far more worldly than he. |
Texas Taliban
jps wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:55:59 -0500, Harry wrote: mgg wrote: "Gene" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:55:12 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Gene" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote: The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not exclusive to the gay population. You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is so abundant, I won't even go there. Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately express themselves. Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved "down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered, and straight..... Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh? . I'm not ASSUMING anything. You weren't forced to be there. It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in PUBLIC. They didn't. It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at the museums.... it was WRONG. I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE. It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it. Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine..... The explanation is... some people are a bit strange. If a child asks a direct question at that age, they should get as direct an answer as possible. OK, so humor me.... two chicks, leather, thigh high stilettos, leash, studded collar, and crop. Couple reaches a cross street and waits for traffic. Domme gets sub on her knees for a little show-off licky-licky.... shoot, it just ain't no fun if everybody isn't able to watch, now is it? So, Dad, what sort of direct answer have you got to explain that to a kid? Yeah...... thought so...... That's why we don't take our kids to San Francisco. harry seems to like it there though. ;-) --Mike Indeed, Mikey, I'm not ambivalent or nervous about my heterosexuality, and I'm not put off or made nervous by "gays." Gays are part of every vibrant community, whereas closed-minded homophobes like you are not. My wife and I love San Francisco. It is a beautiful city, with great architecture, old and new; livable neighborhoods everywhere, terrific restaurants, great meeting places, interesting shops, museums, whatever. Like every big city, it has its problems, but as tourists they don't impact us very much. We've seen gay couples in San Franciso, just as we've seen them in New York, DC, LA, New Orleans, Miami, and even at...Disney World. A few act a bit strangely in public, but most do not. So what? I think my oldest kid was about five when we took our first family vacation to California. We saw some gay couples then...and explained that some women date women and some men date men. No biggie. You mentioned you send your kids to Catholic schools. Now *that* might be a major concern, what with all the pedophilia running rampant in those places, eh? I hope San Francisco's reputation helps keep these close-minded idiots at a distance. Better for the city, its culture and its fans. His kids are likely far more worldly than he. Another nice attribute of SF: the downtown streets are full of people at night, even weeknights, with all manner of folks shopping, dining, going to clubs, whatever. We've got two trips to California scheduled this year so far... :) |
Texas Taliban
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:03:04 -0800, jps wrote:
MESQUITE, Texas — The parents of a 4-year-old boy disciplined for having long hair have rejected a compromise from a Texas school board that agreed to adjust its grooming policy. this is the same state that murdered cameron todd willingham, then, when a commission was about to investigate, the governor fired the commission. texas politics as usual |
Texas Taliban
Harry wrote:
mgg wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:48:32 -0600, wrote: I have to wonder if you intimidate and mock Christian students in your charge. My kid had a teacher like that a few years ago, used to really crush one of her friends pretty bad for being religious. Right in front of the other kids, it was bad... Our kids go to a private Catholic school for just that reason. The PC of public schools is out of control. I want my kids to be proud of their religion, and get a top notch education to boot. The public schools around here, just plain suck. --Mike How do you explain the pedophiliac priests? Are you proud of that aspect of your religion, too? Wow, can i volunteer to help the kiddies? |
Texas Taliban
"Don White" wrote in message ... Harry wrote: mgg wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:48:32 -0600, wrote: I have to wonder if you intimidate and mock Christian students in your charge. My kid had a teacher like that a few years ago, used to really crush one of her friends pretty bad for being religious. Right in front of the other kids, it was bad... Our kids go to a private Catholic school for just that reason. The PC of public schools is out of control. I want my kids to be proud of their religion, and get a top notch education to boot. The public schools around here, just plain suck. --Mike How do you explain the pedophiliac priests? Are you proud of that aspect of your religion, too? Wow, can i volunteer to help the kiddies? Now this must be Dan Kruger doing the spoofing. |
Texas Taliban
Don White wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message ... Harry wrote: mgg wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:48:32 -0600, wrote: I have to wonder if you intimidate and mock Christian students in your charge. My kid had a teacher like that a few years ago, used to really crush one of her friends pretty bad for being religious. Right in front of the other kids, it was bad... Our kids go to a private Catholic school for just that reason. The PC of public schools is out of control. I want my kids to be proud of their religion, and get a top notch education to boot. The public schools around here, just plain suck. --Mike How do you explain the pedophiliac priests? Are you proud of that aspect of your religion, too? Wow, can i volunteer to help the kiddies? Now this must be Dan Kruger doing the spoofing. Hmmm. I thought we decided the spoofers were flajim, justhate, loogy and sw tom? |
Texas Taliban
Harry wrote:
Don White wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... Harry wrote: mgg wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:48:32 -0600, wrote: I have to wonder if you intimidate and mock Christian students in your charge. My kid had a teacher like that a few years ago, used to really crush one of her friends pretty bad for being religious. Right in front of the other kids, it was bad... Our kids go to a private Catholic school for just that reason. The PC of public schools is out of control. I want my kids to be proud of their religion, and get a top notch education to boot. The public schools around here, just plain suck. --Mike How do you explain the pedophiliac priests? Are you proud of that aspect of your religion, too? Wow, can i volunteer to help the kiddies? Now this must be Dan Kruger doing the spoofing. Hmmm. I thought we decided the spoofers were flajim, justhate, loogy and sw tom? You have broken your oath of secrecy. You are no longer welcome in the spoofers club. Please turn in your Harry handle and don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out. We now have an opening for a new spoofer. Please post your interest in the position along with a valid Email address. We will review all applications and notify the new appointee via Email. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com