|
Harry finally gets his wish.
"Don White" wrote in message
... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 2:11 pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Jan 11, 3:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote: On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote: Looks like rec.boats is finished. Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity if true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the years.............and tried to ignore the rest. Thanks Mike agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it. What post? -- Nom=de=Plume Maybe, the one you just answered to? I was giving you sh*t. :) -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is, because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i don't participate in it. Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you shouldn't read usenet postings. -- Nom=de=Plume Dont blame him, he miss-read it while on the treadmill.....- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I don't have a treadmill. I bought a Stairmaster fairly recently... for those days I'm just not willing to run. -- Nom=de=Plume Jumped on my PaceMaster treadmill this morning. Too cold to venture any distance on foot. I'm not a big fan of treadmills, but you do what you can. The hard part to run here in the winter is that it's slippery on the trails (besides the cold). -- Nom=de=Plume |
Harry finally gets his wish.
On Jan 11, 7:25*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 4:53 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message .... On Jan 11, 2:59 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message .... On Jan 11, 2:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote: On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote: Looks like rec.boats is finished. Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity if true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the years.............and tried to ignore the rest. Thanks Mike agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it. What post? -- Nom=de=Plume Maybe, the one you just answered to? I was giving you sh*t. :) -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is, because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i don't participate in it. Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you shouldn't read usenet postings. -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That's jsut it. A lot of times you can;t tell who is "joking" and who isn't. A lot of supposed jokes turn nasty and get serious, causing ill feelings and resentments. I think it's generally pretty obvious. In any case, I was replying to Mike's post (ummm... oh never mind). -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you're posting to my reply was a mistake, and that you told me that your reply to me was to "give me sh*t" wasn't intended for me either. No harm done. Actually, it was my mistake to say I was giving you sh*t. I was giving Mike sh*t. :) So, I apologize if I confused you. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, I don't really think there is any confusion on my part Please refer to post # 14 http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...ead/99bdc10dcb... If that doesn't solve any basis of confusion, and *isn't satisfactory to you , then please believe what you wish. I'm done with the thread. ?;^ ) Reply: Wow... you can't even take an apology.... sheesh. -- Nom=de=Plume Gastric Bypasses make you....grumpy |
Harry finally gets his wish.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:54:47 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: On Jan 11, 4:53*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 2:59 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 2:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote: On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote: Looks like rec.boats is finished. Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity if true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the years.............and tried to ignore the rest. Thanks Mike agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it. What post? -- Nom=de=Plume Maybe, the one you just answered to? I was giving you sh*t. :) -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is, because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i don't participate in it. Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you shouldn't read usenet postings. -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That's jsut it. A lot of times you can;t tell who is "joking" and who isn't. A lot of supposed jokes turn nasty and get serious, causing ill feelings and resentments. I think it's generally pretty obvious. In any case, I was replying to Mike's post (ummm... oh never mind). -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you're posting to my reply was a mistake, and that you told me that your reply to me was to "give me sh*t" wasn't intended for me either. No harm done. Actually, it was my mistake to say I was giving you sh*t. I was giving Mike sh*t. :) So, I apologize if I confused you. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, I don't really think there is any confusion on my part Please refer to post # 14 http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...3d1?scoring=d& If that doesn't solve any basis of confusion, and isn't satisfactory to you , then please believe what you wish. I'm done with the thread. ?;^ ) Apparently, she believes that an apology for your confusion is an apology. That's like saying I'm sorry she's so friggin' dense. I'd have to be wrong, 'cause there's nothing dense about a vacuum. -- America needs Obamacare like Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask. John H |
Harry finally gets his wish.
On Jan 11, 8:33*pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:54:47 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Jan 11, 4:53*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message .... On Jan 11, 2:59 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 2:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote: On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote: Looks like rec.boats is finished. Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity if true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the years.............and tried to ignore the rest. Thanks Mike agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it. What post? -- Nom=de=Plume Maybe, the one you just answered to? I was giving you sh*t. :) -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is, because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i don't participate in it. Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you shouldn't read usenet postings. -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That's jsut it. A lot of times you can;t tell who is "joking" and who isn't. A lot of supposed jokes turn nasty and get serious, causing ill feelings and resentments. I think it's generally pretty obvious. In any case, I was replying to Mike's post (ummm... oh never mind). -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you're posting to my reply was a mistake, and that you told me that your reply to me was to "give me sh*t" wasn't intended for me either. No harm done. Actually, it was my mistake to say I was giving you sh*t. I was giving Mike sh*t. :) So, I apologize if I confused you. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, I don't really think there is any confusion on my part Please refer to post # 14 http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...ead/99bdc10dcb... If that doesn't solve any basis of confusion, and *isn't satisfactory to you , then please believe what you wish. I'm done with the thread. ?;^ ) Apparently, she believes that an apology for your confusion is an apology. That's like saying I'm sorry she's so friggin' dense. I'd have to be wrong, 'cause there's nothing dense about a vacuum. -- America needs Obamacare like Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask. John H 'cause there's nothing dense about a vacuum. Like the one in your Pumpkin Head. |
Harry finally gets his wish.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:07:46 -0500, Jim the Asshole wrote:
Better if you took your "****" somewhere else. Speaking of taking **** elsewhere. Why not consider restricting yours to one dildo at a time? Your voice sounds the same no matter which dildo you inhabit. |
Harry finally gets his wish.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:25:46 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 4:53 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 2:59 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 2:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote: On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote: Looks like rec.boats is finished. Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity if true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the years.............and tried to ignore the rest. Thanks Mike agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it. What post? -- Nom=de=Plume Maybe, the one you just answered to? I was giving you sh*t. :) -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is, because of all the provoking, slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i don't participate in it. Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you shouldn't read usenet postings. -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That's jsut it. A lot of times you can;t tell who is "joking" and who isn't. A lot of supposed jokes turn nasty and get serious, causing ill feelings and resentments. I think it's generally pretty obvious. In any case, I was replying to Mike's post (ummm... oh never mind). -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you're posting to my reply was a mistake, and that you told me that your reply to me was to "give me sh*t" wasn't intended for me either. No harm done. Actually, it was my mistake to say I was giving you sh*t. I was giving Mike sh*t. :) So, I apologize if I confused you. -- Nom=de=Plume Oh, I don't really think there is any confusion on my part Please refer to post # 14 http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...3d1?scoring=d& If that doesn't solve any basis of confusion, and isn't satisfactory to you , then please believe what you wish. I'm done with the thread. ?;^ ) Reply: Wow... you can't even take an apology.... sheesh. He's not into turning the other cheek. That went out in the 11th century. |
Harry finally gets his wish.
|
Harry finally gets his wish.
On Jan 12, 9:14*am, Harry wrote:
In article , says... "Harry" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 11:55 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 9, 9:22 pm, Mike wrote: On Jan 9, 5:41 pm, Jim wrote: Looks like rec.boats is finished. Ummmmm..for those of us who arn't really involved in the push and shove, why is REC.BOATS "finished"? Source and time line? A pity if true, I actually learned a bit about boating here through the years.............and tried to ignore the rest. Thanks Mike agreed. It can't be finished. I just posted to it. What post? -- Nom=de=Plume Maybe, the one you just answered to? I was giving you sh*t. :) -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Another thought. this is one reason rec.boats is the way it is, because of all the provoking, *slinging and pot stirrig. That's why i don't participate in it. Calm down Tim. It was a joke. If you didn't/don't get it, perhaps you shouldn't read usenet postings. Tim's not into this game. He doesn't need assholes like you provoking him. Pick on someone else, or better yet get the hell out of here and go play with your barbie dolls. I needed that. It calmed me right down. Better yet, why don't you go play with your dildos Kevin/Ditzy/FlatulentJim. Try us again in the spring. Wow, little buddy, you sure told him! And the spoofing asshole flajim...strikes again. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com