On 9/11, Islamic terrorists killed 2973 people. In the Ok city
bombing McVeigh killed 168. If you add in the 3 others killed by some
crazies and call them “Right Wing Terror”, you find that Islamic
terrorists killed over 17.5X as many people in the USA as any other
terror types since 9/11. However, somehow libs at The Daily Beast:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-a...id=bs:archive1
think we should not profile Islamist types because it will not stop
McVeigh types. Huh? Can libs do any math?
Let’s take that a step at a time. ISLAMIC terrorists killed 17.5
times as many as all other terrorists in the USA since 9/11. So, do
you search the Scandanavian girl scout or Achmed chanting “Allahu
Akbar”? Oh, the libs say search em both. What if you have 100 girls
scouts from Norway flying and there is one guy named Mohammed looking
nervous and murmuring islamic prayers? Who do you search? Once
again, the libs say you should search girl scouts because anything
else is profiling.
OK, Mohammed blows up the plane. The libs all scream that “security
doesn’t work”. Who is at fault here?

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On 9/11, Islamic terrorists killed 2973 people. In the Ok city
bombing McVeigh killed 168. If you add in the 3 others killed by some
crazies and call them “Right Wing Terror”, you find that Islamic
terrorists killed over 17.5X as many people in the USA as any other
terror types since 9/11. However, somehow libs at The Daily Beast:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-a...id=bs:archive1
think we should not profile Islamist types because it will not stop
McVeigh types. Huh? Can libs do any math?
Let’s take that a step at a time. ISLAMIC terrorists killed 17.5
times as many as all other terrorists in the USA since 9/11. So, do
you search the Scandanavian girl scout or Achmed chanting “Allahu
Akbar”? Oh, the libs say search em both. What if you have 100 girls
scouts from Norway flying and there is one guy named Mohammed looking
nervous and murmuring islamic prayers? Who do you search? Once
again, the libs say you should search girl scouts because anything
else is profiling.
OK, Mohammed blows up the plane. The libs all scream that “security
doesn’t work”. Who is at fault here?


REPLY: You're delusional. I think they should strip search you everytime you
get near an airport.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On 9/11, Islamic terrorists killed 2973 people. In the Ok city
bombing McVeigh killed 168. If you add in the 3 others killed by some
crazies and call them ?Right Wing Terror?, you find that Islamic
terrorists killed over 17.5X as many people in the USA as any other
terror types since 9/11. However, somehow libs at The Daily Beast:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-a...id=bs:archive1
think we should not profile Islamist types because it will not stop
McVeigh types. Huh? Can libs do any math?
Let?s take that a step at a time. ISLAMIC terrorists killed 17.5
times as many as all other terrorists in the USA since 9/11. So, do
you search the Scandanavian girl scout or Achmed chanting ?Allahu
Akbar?? Oh, the libs say search em both. What if you have 100 girls
scouts from Norway flying and there is one guy named Mohammed looking
nervous and murmuring islamic prayers? Who do you search? Once
again, the libs say you should search girl scouts because anything
else is profiling.
OK, Mohammed blows up the plane. The libs all scream that ?security
doesn?t work?. Who is at fault here?


REPLY: You're delusional. I think they should strip search you everytime you
get near an airport.

Did you hear that for the new scanning machines they are advertising
positions at voyeurs dot comm?

"lil abner" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On 9/11, Islamic terrorists killed 2973 people. In the Ok city
bombing McVeigh killed 168. If you add in the 3 others killed by some
crazies and call them ?Right Wing Terror?, you find that Islamic
terrorists killed over 17.5X as many people in the USA as any other
terror types since 9/11. However, somehow libs at The Daily Beast:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-a...id=bs:archive1
think we should not profile Islamist types because it will not stop
McVeigh types. Huh? Can libs do any math?
Let?s take that a step at a time. ISLAMIC terrorists killed 17.5
times as many as all other terrorists in the USA since 9/11. So, do
you search the Scandanavian girl scout or Achmed chanting ?Allahu
Akbar?? Oh, the libs say search em both. What if you have 100 girls
scouts from Norway flying and there is one guy named Mohammed looking
nervous and murmuring islamic prayers? Who do you search? Once
again, the libs say you should search girl scouts because anything
else is profiling.
OK, Mohammed blows up the plane. The libs all scream that ?security
doesn?t work?. Who is at fault here?


REPLY: You're delusional. I think they should strip search you everytime
you get near an airport.

Did you hear that for the new scanning machines they are advertising
positions at voyeurs dot comm?


Heh...

I thought they were going to give you a choice... get scanned or felt up.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"lil abner" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On 9/11, Islamic terrorists killed 2973 people. In the Ok city
bombing McVeigh killed 168. If you add in the 3 others killed by some
crazies and call them ?Right Wing Terror?, you find that Islamic
terrorists killed over 17.5X as many people in the USA as any other
terror types since 9/11. However, somehow libs at The Daily Beast:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-a...id=bs:archive1
think we should not profile Islamist types because it will not stop
McVeigh types. Huh? Can libs do any math?
Let?s take that a step at a time. ISLAMIC terrorists killed 17.5
times as many as all other terrorists in the USA since 9/11. So, do
you search the Scandanavian girl scout or Achmed chanting ?Allahu
Akbar?? Oh, the libs say search em both. What if you have 100 girls
scouts from Norway flying and there is one guy named Mohammed looking
nervous and murmuring islamic prayers? Who do you search? Once
again, the libs say you should search girl scouts because anything
else is profiling.
OK, Mohammed blows up the plane. The libs all scream that ?security
doesn?t work?. Who is at fault here?


REPLY: You're delusional. I think they should strip search you everytime
you get near an airport.

Did you hear that for the new scanning machines they are advertising
positions at voyeurs dot comm?


Heh...

I thought they were going to give you a choice... get scanned or felt up.


Well, that won't be enough to make me give up my job as bra fitter at
Victoria's Secret.. :)