On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:29:38 -0500, Anony Mouse wrote:


Now, what about correcting loogy?

What would be the point?

Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:44:12 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

It is friggin cold here in N. FL. Cats and dogs are completely
confused standing at he door looking at me accusingly as they are
thinking, "OK, you can make it warm again now"

It is friggin cold here in S. FL also.

You can say that again.

On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:54:12 -0500, Jim wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:44:12 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

It is friggin cold here in N. FL. Cats and dogs are completely
confused standing at he door looking at me accusingly as they are
thinking, "OK, you can make it warm again now"

It is friggin cold here in S. FL also.

You can say that again.

It's cold in S. FL. also.

In article ,
says...

Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 8:44 am, Frogwatch wrote:
It is friggin cold here in N. FL. Cats and dogs are completely
confused standing at he door looking at me accusingly as they are
thinking, "OK, you can make it warm again now"

And what does that have to do with global warming? I asked in a thread
earlier when the unscientific right will say that global warming isn't
happening because an arctic front has moved south. I think I have my
answer!

Do you think he might be commenting on the weather rather than the climate?

Did you see the title of the thread?

In article , says...

"Loogypicker" wrote in message
...
On Jan 6, 8:44 am, Frogwatch wrote:
It is friggin cold here in N. FL. Cats and dogs are completely
confused standing at he door looking at me accusingly as they are
thinking, "OK, you can make it warm again now"

And what does that have to do with global warming? I asked in a thread
earlier when the unscientific right will say that global warming isn't
happening because an arctic front has moved south. I think I have my
answer!

Not really. You are the only one using the term "global warming". "Climate
change" does not necessarily equate to global warming. The high today in my
location is 45 and clear, relative humidity 48%. Yesterday it was 54 and
cloudy, relative humidity 68%. That's climate change.

Climate is long term, weather (which you are talking about here) is
short term.

cli·mate /'kla?m?t/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [klahy-mit] Show IPA
Use Climate in a Sentence
See web results for Climate
See images of Climate
?noun 1. the composite or generally prevailing weather conditions of a
region, as temperature, air pressure, humidity, precipitation, sunshine,
cloudiness, and winds, throughout the year, averaged over a series of
years.
2. a region or area characterized by a given climate: to move to a warm
climate.

As opposed to weather:

weath·er /'w?ð?r/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [weth-er] Show IPA
Use weather in a Sentence
See web results for weather
See images of weather
?noun 1. the state of the atmosphere with respect to wind, temperature,
cloudiness, moisture, pressure, etc.
2. a strong wind or storm or strong winds and storms collectively: We've
had some real weather this spring.

In article , says...

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:04:28 -0500, Anony Mouse wrote:

Not really. You are the only one using the term "global warming".
"Climate change" does not necessarily equate to global warming. The high
today in my location is 45 and clear, relative humidity 48%. Yesterday
it was 54 and cloudy, relative humidity 68%. That's climate change.

Not really. You are not considering the time factor. Climate generally
refers to long term weather. Short term weather, is just that, weather.

Your point is well taken, and thanks for correcting me. The term is neutral,
I.e., not heating or cooling.

Now, what about correcting loogy?

What????? in hell are you talking about? Who in hell said that climate
is neutral?

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:29:38 -0500, Anony Mouse wrote:


Now, what about correcting loogy?

What would be the point?

No correction needed.

NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 8:44 am, Frogwatch wrote:
It is friggin cold here in N. FL. Cats and dogs are completely
confused standing at he door looking at me accusingly as they are
thinking, "OK, you can make it warm again now"
And what does that have to do with global warming? I asked in a thread
earlier when the unscientific right will say that global warming isn't
happening because an arctic front has moved south. I think I have my
answer!
Do you think he might be commenting on the weather rather than the climate?

Did you see the title of the thread?

Yes I did.

On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:07:33 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:54:12 -0500, Jim wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:44:12 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

It is friggin cold here in N. FL. Cats and dogs are completely
confused standing at he door looking at me accusingly as they are
thinking, "OK, you can make it warm again now"

It is friggin cold here in S. FL also.

You can say that again.

It's cold in S. FL. also.

Thank YOU!

On Jan 6, 12:54*pm, Jim wrote:
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 8:44 am, Frogwatch wrote:
It is friggin cold here in N. FL. *Cats and dogs are completely
confused standing at he door looking at me accusingly as they are
thinking, "OK, you can make it warm again now"
And what does that have to do with global warming? I asked in a thread
earlier when the unscientific right will say that global warming isn't
happening because an arctic front has moved south. I think I have my
answer!
Do you think he might be commenting on the weather rather than the climate?

Did you see the title of the thread?

Yes I did.

Well, then the answer is before your eyes. He was talking about
CLIMATE. The word "weather" was never in the original post. The word
"climate" was.