|
It's starting, people
Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset
about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. |
It's starting, people
"Steve B" wrote in message ... Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. I'm going out on a limb here ............ GOING SOCIAL. |
It's starting, people
Steve B wrote:
Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well. |
It's starting, people
Harry wrote:
Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. Here's one readers view of the scenerio. Probably right on the mark too. "His case had nothing to do with racial discrimination, He had moved from California, where benefits are subsidized to cover a higher cost of living, to Nevada, which has no subsidy. He was essentially upset over being treated like every social security recipient in the state where he resided. sarcasm Playing the race card failed, so naturally it was time to grab a shotgun and get some justice! /sarcasm" A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. hearsay The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. Oh really. What then? 2. He was upset about losing a court case. Wouldn't you be? 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Speculation on your part. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. More speculation on your part. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. The expected unhinged juvenile rant you usually close a post with. -- If it's not posted with a mac, it's the real deal. |
It's starting, people
|
It's starting, people
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:10:40 -0500, Harry wrote:
Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire.. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others Oh well. Other groups are seeing him for what he is. If he thinks it will draw attention to himself, he posts others work product or makes up lies. Like many here he is a simpleton. I don't have to post names. They are too obvious. |
It's starting, people
RLM wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:10:40 -0500, Harry wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire.. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others Oh well. Other groups are seeing him for what he is. If he thinks it will draw attention to himself, he posts others work product or makes up lies. Like many here he is a simpleton. I don't have to post names. They are too obvious. Well, rec.boats really isn't much of a group for dicussion anymore. Instead it is mostly a group for right-wing haters who seem intent on trying to drive out any and all who are not a part of their borg-like collective so they can discuss their crap without interference. Imagine a usenet group dominated by morons like justhate, steve b, krueger, flajim, bar, et cetera. Wait...no need to imagine...it's right here. |
It's starting, people
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:59:48 -0500, Harry wrote:
RLM wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:10:40 -0500, Harry wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire.. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others Oh well. Other groups are seeing him for what he is. If he thinks it will draw attention to himself, he posts others work product or makes up lies. Like many here he is a simpleton. I don't have to post names. They are too obvious. Well, rec.boats really isn't much of a group for dicussion anymore. Instead it is mostly a group for right-wing haters who seem intent on trying to drive out any and all who are not a part of their borg-like collective so they can discuss their crap without interference. Imagine a usenet group dominated by morons like justhate, steve b, krueger, flajim, bar, et cetera. Wait...no need to imagine...it's right here. There are some of these boobs that have started infecting groups that I never thought would drop to the level it is here. |
It's starting, people
On Jan 5, 10:41*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... Las Vegas, Nevada. *Federal Building. *A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. *Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. *Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. *Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. There is starting to be reports this was a guy who was known for extreme racial prejudice toward er, um... "white people". Being this may have been black on white hate crime, I am sure that aspect of the crime will be ignored in the minority media though...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Cite? |
It's starting, people
On Jan 4, 10:10*pm, Harry wrote:
Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. *Federal Building. *A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. *Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. *Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. *Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September.. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! |
It's starting, people
|
It's starting, people
|
It's starting, people
On Jan 6, 9:33*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10*pm, Harry wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. *Federal Building. *A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. *Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. *Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. *Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? |
It's starting, people
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? Sure. Go ahead. |
It's starting, people
On Jan 6, 10:02*am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. *Federal Building. *A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. *Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. *Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. *Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely.. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's.. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? Sure. Go ahead.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - With pleasure! 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire |
It's starting, people
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 10:02 am, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? Sure. Go ahead.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - With pleasure! 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire If I'm not mistaken, Harry said that in response to the initial post. To answer your question, I see a lot of dishonesty in the majority of Harry's posts when I see them. |
It's starting, people
Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 10:02 am, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? Sure. Go ahead.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - With pleasure! 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire If I'm not mistaken, Harry said that in response to the initial post. To answer your question, I see a lot of dishonesty in the majority of Harry's posts when I see them. Don't blame me for your useless life and your roaming wife. |
It's starting, people
On Jan 6, 1:47*pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 10:02 am, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. *Federal Building. *A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. *Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S.. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. *Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. *Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? Sure. Go ahead.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - With pleasure! 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire If I'm not mistaken, Harry said that in response to the initial post. To answer your question, I see a lot of dishonesty in the majority of Harry's posts when I see them.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - As do I. It still stands, however, that he's right on this particular instance. Sad but true! |
It's starting, people
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:47 pm, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 10:02 am, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? Sure. Go ahead.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - With pleasure! 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire If I'm not mistaken, Harry said that in response to the initial post. To answer your question, I see a lot of dishonesty in the majority of Harry's posts when I see them.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - As do I. It still stands, however, that he's right on this particular instance. Sad but true! It must be nice to be clairvoyant, you and Harry. You can read the mind of a dead man. You two have more in common than you think. |
It's starting, people
|
It's starting, people
On Jan 8, 10:58*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article deb59ca6-a434-4f2a-9112-a1f1fe2ab8e4 @j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? Me? I don't care about some whimsical post, what I am concerned with is your inability to see any post without your defensive political glasses on... Makes it hard to have fun anymore.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Do you think it's fun to berate, belittle, insult and call names to all liberals??? Do you think it's fun to read lies, the deceipt, the out of context crap that is here day after day after day from the unhinged people like John and Froggy? I dont'. |
It's starting, people
On Jan 6, 4:05*pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 1:47 pm, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 10:02 am, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. *Federal Building. *A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. *Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U..S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. *Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. *Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? Sure. Go ahead.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - With pleasure! 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire If I'm not mistaken, Harry said that in response to the initial post. To answer your question, I see a lot of dishonesty in the majority of Harry's posts when I see them.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - As do I. It still stands, however, that he's right on this particular instance. Sad but true! It must be nice to be clairvoyant, you and Harry. You can read the mind of a dead man. You two have more in common than you think.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It has nothing to do with reading of minds. He made statements to that affect. But I know, it just doesn't read like liberal = bad, conservative = good, so it had to be changed. |
It's starting, people
|
It's starting, people
On 1/8/2010 11:23 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 8, 10:58 am, I am wrote: In articledeb59ca6-a434-4f2a-9112-a1f1fe2ab8e4 @j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am wrote: In articleb83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? Me? I don't care about some whimsical post, what I am concerned with is your inability to see any post without your defensive political glasses on... Makes it hard to have fun anymore.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Do you think it's fun to berate, belittle, insult and call names to all liberals??? Do you think it's fun to read lies, the deceipt, the out of context crap that is here day after day after day from the unhinged people like John and Froggy? I dont'. You should have realized by now that I don't care that much about other people, especially if they aren't white and don't have much money. |
It's starting, people
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 4:05 pm, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 1:47 pm, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 10:02 am, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? Sure. Go ahead.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - With pleasure! 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire If I'm not mistaken, Harry said that in response to the initial post. To answer your question, I see a lot of dishonesty in the majority of Harry's posts when I see them.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - As do I. It still stands, however, that he's right on this particular instance. Sad but true! It must be nice to be clairvoyant, you and Harry. You can read the mind of a dead man. You two have more in common than you think.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It has nothing to do with reading of minds. He made statements to that affect. But I know, it just doesn't read like liberal = bad, conservative = good, so it had to be changed. I thought it was about you and harry knowing what the perp was thinking when he apparently went nuts. Who made what statements? What had to be changed? Who said anything about the bad liberals? Are you purposefully trying to confuse me? |
It's starting, people
John H wrote:
On 1/8/2010 11:23 AM, Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 8, 10:58 am, I am wrote: In articledeb59ca6-a434-4f2a-9112-a1f1fe2ab8e4 @j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am wrote: In articleb83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? Me? I don't care about some whimsical post, what I am concerned with is your inability to see any post without your defensive political glasses on... Makes it hard to have fun anymore.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Do you think it's fun to berate, belittle, insult and call names to all liberals??? Do you think it's fun to read lies, the deceipt, the out of context crap that is here day after day after day from the unhinged people like John and Froggy? I dont'. You should have realized by now that I don't care that much about other people, especially if they aren't white and don't have much money. Congratulations on your new MAC John. When did you get it? |
It's starting, people
On Jan 8, 1:13*pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 4:05 pm, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 1:47 pm, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 10:02 am, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. *Federal Building. *A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. *Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. *Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. *Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? Sure. Go ahead.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - With pleasure! 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire If I'm not mistaken, Harry said that in response to the initial post.. To answer your question, I see a lot of dishonesty in the majority of Harry's posts when I see them.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - As do I. It still stands, however, that he's right on this particular instance. Sad but true! It must be nice to be clairvoyant, you and Harry. You can read the mind of a dead man. You two have more in common than you think.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It has nothing to do with reading of minds. He made statements to that affect. But I know, it just doesn't read like liberal = bad, conservative = good, so it had to be changed. I thought it was about you and harry knowing what the perp was thinking when he apparently went nuts. Who made what statements? What had to be changed? Who said anything about the bad liberals? Are you purposefully trying to confuse me?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Are you really that narrow? It wasn't about a cut in his benefits. He was ****ed because he thought he was being denied full benefit because of his race. Therefore, this statement is false at least when it comes to this person: Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. |
It's starting, people
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 8, 1:13 pm, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 4:05 pm, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 1:47 pm, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 10:02 am, Jim wrote: Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? Sure. Go ahead.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - With pleasure! 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire If I'm not mistaken, Harry said that in response to the initial post. To answer your question, I see a lot of dishonesty in the majority of Harry's posts when I see them.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - As do I. It still stands, however, that he's right on this particular instance. Sad but true! It must be nice to be clairvoyant, you and Harry. You can read the mind of a dead man. You two have more in common than you think.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It has nothing to do with reading of minds. He made statements to that affect. But I know, it just doesn't read like liberal = bad, conservative = good, so it had to be changed. I thought it was about you and harry knowing what the perp was thinking when he apparently went nuts. Who made what statements? What had to be changed? Who said anything about the bad liberals? Are you purposefully trying to confuse me?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Are you really that narrow? It wasn't about a cut in his benefits. He was ****ed because he thought he was being denied full benefit because of his race. Therefore, this statement is false at least when it comes to this person: Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. Did he say that just before his rampage. The statement was made by Steve I think. He was offering his opinion. How can an opinion be false. You are trying to confuse me again Loogie. Please stop. |
It's starting, people
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:25:15 -0500, Jim wrote:
John H wrote: On 1/8/2010 11:23 AM, Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 8, 10:58 am, I am wrote: In articledeb59ca6-a434-4f2a-9112-a1f1fe2ab8e4 @j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am wrote: In articleb83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, wrote: Steve B wrote: Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall was wounded, and the perp was dead. Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or cancelled. It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad about themselves. Steve RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66 years old, who had given of himself his whole career. You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight: "Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race, according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September. A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with no accomplices. The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital, where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas since 1994, Carter said." 1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits. 2. He was upset about losing a court case. 3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on fire. Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security, and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely. Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's. Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the Krueger, and a few others. Oh well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual dishonesty! Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole, you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity, that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me to point each one out? Me? I don't care about some whimsical post, what I am concerned with is your inability to see any post without your defensive political glasses on... Makes it hard to have fun anymore.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Do you think it's fun to berate, belittle, insult and call names to all liberals??? Do you think it's fun to read lies, the deceipt, the out of context crap that is here day after day after day from the unhinged people like John and Froggy? I dont'. You should have realized by now that I don't care that much about other people, especially if they aren't white and don't have much money. Congratulations on your new MAC John. When did you get it? It's funny how honest Harry can be about himself when he's spoofing someone else. A classic Harry Krause line: ******************* You should have realized by now that I don't care that much about other people, especially if they aren't white and don't have much money. ***************** |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com