|
Yo, Scotty!
jsut thought I'd pop in here a momenty to say I'm dong much better
today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning. Thanks for checking on me. |
Yo, Scotty!
|
Yo, Scotty!
On Dec 29, 12:58*pm, I am Tosk
wrote: In article 0106cfab-6995-412d-a140- , says... jsut thought I'd pop in here a momenty to say I'm dong much better today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning. Thanks for checking on me. Good, I will call you later.. Thanks guy. |
Yo, Scotty!
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:26:59 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: jsut thought I'd pop in here a momenty to say I'm dong much better today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning. Thanks for checking on me. Your dong is doing much better? Well, that is - um...er....interesting. |
Yo, Scotty!
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:26:59 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: jsut thought I'd pop in here a momenty to say I'm dong much better today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning. Thanks for checking on me. You don't have Snotty's personal email or phone number? Would you like to publish your telephone number here so more people can call and check on you and then you can thank us on rec.boats? |
Yo, Scotty!
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:25:48 -0500, Gene
wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:19:17 -0500, Tom Francis wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:26:59 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: jsut thought I'd pop in here a momenty to say I'm dong much better today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning. Thanks for checking on me. Your dong is doing much better? Well, that is - um...er....interesting. Somebody got a Christmas present! A fake dong? One without the requisite ding? |
Yo, Scotty!
On Dec 29, 4:17*pm, Tom Francis
wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:25:48 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:19:17 -0500, Tom Francis wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:26:59 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: jsut thought I'd pop in here a moment to say I'm dong much better today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning. Thanks for checking on me. Your dong is doing much better? Well, that is - um...er....interesting. Somebody got a Christmas present! A fake dong? One without the requisite ding? No, i But thanks anyhow. |
Yo, Scotty!
On Dec 29, 3:39*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:26:59 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: jsut thought I'd pop in here a momenty to say I'm dong much better today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning. Thanks for checking on me. You don't have Snotty's personal email or phone number? Would you like to publish your telephone number here so more people can call and check on you and then you can thank us on rec.boats? Sure, I'll tell you what Ill do. I'll post my phone number and let you call me day or night and you can chew me out up and down and right and left and call me anything in the book and belittle me in any way that you feel. That is your privilege. I have excellent Caller ID, and I don't answer "unknown', blocked' or "out of area' calls. But if you have an honest call number that will show up on my ID , I will listen to your grievances, then politely post your phone number back on rec. boats as well. So, who's phone you decide to use, will receive the same courtesies. fair enough? |
Yo, Scotty!
On Dec 29, 4:17*pm, Tom Francis
wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:25:48 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:19:17 -0500, Tom Francis wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:26:59 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: just thought I'd pop in here a moment to say I'm doing much better today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning. Thanks for checking on me. Your dong is doing much better? Well, that is - um...er....interesting. Somebody got a Christmas present! A fake dong? One without the requisite ding? Oh, I see my typing error has caused confusion. I have corrected it on this return post. Questions and explanations on the dockside |
Yo, Scotty!
jps wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:26:59 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: jsut thought I'd pop in here a momenty to say I'm dong much better today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning. Thanks for checking on me. You don't have Snotty's personal email or phone number? Would you like to publish your telephone number here so more people can call and check on you and then you can thank us on rec.boats? yeah, can you imagine anyone being so stupid as doing that? He did i tell you about my shipment that is being sent via Federal Express. If you want, I can give you hourly updates on where it is. |
Yo, Scotty!
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:59:36 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: On Dec 29, 3:39*pm, jps wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:26:59 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: jsut thought I'd pop in here a momenty to say I'm dong much better today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning. Thanks for checking on me. You don't have Snotty's personal email or phone number? Would you like to publish your telephone number here so more people can call and check on you and then you can thank us on rec.boats? Sure, I'll tell you what Ill do. I'll post my phone number and let you call me day or night and you can chew me out up and down and right and left and call me anything in the book and belittle me in any way that you feel. That is your privilege. I have excellent Caller ID, and I don't answer "unknown', blocked' or "out of area' calls. But if you have an honest call number that will show up on my ID , I will listen to your grievances, then politely post your phone number back on rec. boats as well. So, who's phone you decide to use, will receive the same courtesies. fair enough? I don't care about knowing your number or even speaking with you, I was just curious why you use rec.boats to thank Snotty for calling to check on you. You clearly already have his email and telephone number. |
Yo, Scotty!
On Dec 30, 12:44*am, jps wrote:
I was just curious why you use rec.boats to thank Snotty for calling to check on you. The same reason you use rec.boats to post your anti-gun articles and curse republicans. Because you want to. |
Yo, Scotty!
jps wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:59:36 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 29, 3:39 pm, jps wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:26:59 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: jsut thought I'd pop in here a momenty to say I'm dong much better today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning. Thanks for checking on me. You don't have Snotty's personal email or phone number? Would you like to publish your telephone number here so more people can call and check on you and then you can thank us on rec.boats? Sure, I'll tell you what Ill do. I'll post my phone number and let you call me day or night and you can chew me out up and down and right and left and call me anything in the book and belittle me in any way that you feel. That is your privilege. I have excellent Caller ID, and I don't answer "unknown', blocked' or "out of area' calls. But if you have an honest call number that will show up on my ID , I will listen to your grievances, then politely post your phone number back on rec. boats as well. So, who's phone you decide to use, will receive the same courtesies. fair enough? I don't care about knowing your number or even speaking with you, I was just curious why you use rec.boats to thank Snotty for calling to check on you. You clearly already have his email and telephone number. Yeah, you tell him, can you imagine anyone discussing a private conversation in rec.boats. i know you and i have never done it. Do they still archive posts, if so, i may have to delete this post. |
Yo, Scotty!
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:21:04 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: On Dec 30, 12:44*am, jps wrote: I was just curious why you use rec.boats to thank Snotty for calling to check on you. The same reason you use rec.boats to post your anti-gun articles and curse republicans. Because you want to. I do it to broadcast to as many as are willing to listen and consider. I don't consider you or your friend J among those who'd keep an open mind. There are intelligent beings who'll engage in a debate, but unfortunately, they're few and far between. Probably no less frequent than folks that are willing to convert to whatever it is you practice in church and elsewhere. Do you post your thanks to Snotty in order to broadcast your message? |
Yo, Scotty!
jps wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:21:04 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 30, 12:44 am, jps wrote: I was just curious why you use rec.boats to thank Snotty for calling to check on you. The same reason you use rec.boats to post your anti-gun articles and curse republicans. Because you want to. I do it to broadcast to as many as are willing to listen and consider. I don't consider you or your friend J among those who'd keep an open mind. There are intelligent beings who'll engage in a debate, but unfortunately, they're few and far between. Probably no less frequent than folks that are willing to convert to whatever it is you practice in church and elsewhere. Do you post your thanks to Snotty in order to broadcast your message? If I wanted to debate guns, I'd go to a gun group. |
Yo, Scotty!
D.Duck wrote:
jps wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:21:04 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 30, 12:44 am, jps wrote: I was just curious why you use rec.boats to thank Snotty for calling to check on you. The same reason you use rec.boats to post your anti-gun articles and curse republicans. Because you want to. I do it to broadcast to as many as are willing to listen and consider. I don't consider you or your friend J among those who'd keep an open mind. There are intelligent beings who'll engage in a debate, but unfortunately, they're few and far between. Probably no less frequent than folks that are willing to convert to whatever it is you practice in church and elsewhere. Do you post your thanks to Snotty in order to broadcast your message? If I wanted to debate guns, I'd go to a gun group. We all know you come here to drop snotty comments. There's no other reason for your presence here, eh, quacker? |
Yo, Scotty!
|
Yo, Scotty!
|
Yo, Scotty!
thanks for the Call, John. it's appreciated.
|
Yo, Scotty!
On Dec 30, 3:44*am, jps wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:21:04 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 30, 12:44*am, jps wrote: *I was just curious why you use rec.boats to thank Snotty for calling to check on you. The same reason you use rec.boats to post your anti-gun articles and curse republicans. Because you want to. I do it to broadcast to as many as are willing to listen and consider. yeah, yeah... "Through the woodlands, through the valleys comes a horseman wild and free...." |
Yo, Scotty!
Thanks for the concerns, Mike.
|
Yo, Scotty!
Harry wrote:
D.Duck wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:21:04 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 30, 12:44 am, jps wrote: I was just curious why you use rec.boats to thank Snotty for calling to check on you. The same reason you use rec.boats to post your anti-gun articles and curse republicans. Because you want to. I do it to broadcast to as many as are willing to listen and consider. I don't consider you or your friend J among those who'd keep an open mind. There are intelligent beings who'll engage in a debate, but unfortunately, they're few and far between. Probably no less frequent than folks that are willing to convert to whatever it is you practice in church and elsewhere. Do you post your thanks to Snotty in order to broadcast your message? If I wanted to debate guns, I'd go to a gun group. We all know you come here to drop snotty comments. There's no other reason for your presence here, eh, quacker? I am curious, would anyone think my response here was a snotty comment? |
Yo, Scotty!
Tim wrote:
thanks for the Call, John. it's appreciated. What about me? What about my call? |
Yo, Scotty!
Harry wrote:
D.Duck wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:21:04 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 30, 12:44 am, jps wrote: I was just curious why you use rec.boats to thank Snotty for calling to check on you. The same reason you use rec.boats to post your anti-gun articles and curse republicans. Because you want to. I do it to broadcast to as many as are willing to listen and consider. I don't consider you or your friend J among those who'd keep an open mind. There are intelligent beings who'll engage in a debate, but unfortunately, they're few and far between. Probably no less frequent than folks that are willing to convert to whatever it is you practice in church and elsewhere. Do you post your thanks to Snotty in order to broadcast your message? If I wanted to debate guns, I'd go to a gun group. We all know you come here to drop snotty comments. There's no other reason for your presence here, eh, quacker? My comments no where come close to reaching the level of "snot" as yours. |
Yo, Scotty!
jps wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:21:04 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 30, 12:44 am, jps wrote: I was just curious why you use rec.boats to thank Snotty for calling to check on you. The same reason you use rec.boats to post your anti-gun articles and curse republicans. Because you want to. I do it to broadcast to as many as are willing to listen and consider. I don't consider you or your friend J among those who'd keep an open mind. There are intelligent beings who'll engage in a debate, but unfortunately, they're few and far between. Probably no less frequent than folks that are willing to convert to whatever it is you practice in church and elsewhere. Do you post your thanks to Snotty in order to broadcast your message? i've been thinking. You clearly don't share my love and reverence for guns. What say you and i have a little chat about guns on rec.boats. i guarantee such a discussion will increase your readership. Regurgitating news clips as you currently are doing only shows how stupid you really are. Debate me and i'll prove it. H The worlds greatest. -- I get so upset by these spoofers, that I think I am going to make more crossposts between rec.boats and numerous unrelated newsgroups, because at least that is not detrimental to rec.boats. This group needs some new blood, and that is always a good way to get some new posters who enjoy boating as much as i do. |
Yo, Scotty!
I am Tosk wrote:
Please Tim, get a filter;) Anyway, it was great following up with you last night from about 5 to 5:45 pm, while flying down route 9;) I'm tellin' you, I have been there before and know how you feel. It's up to you now, as my neighbor used to say, "how you gonna' act"? Glad to hear everything came out all right so far;) I will keep you well posted, I am cleaning the basement today, maybe I will put up some progress pictures;) Now we find out when and how long the phone conversations are? Christ. |
Yo, Scotty!
Good talking with you today capn, Francis.
I appreciate your comments and concerns. |
Yo, Scotty!
On Dec 30, 10:29*am, Tim wrote:
Good talking with you today capn, Francis. I appreciate your comments and concerns. Actually, I think I got the timing wrong, I will check my phone. Either way, I can attach the "tracking code" from Fedex as I was riding in a FedEx Truck at the time, wrapped in a small box... Got some cupons for Christmas and wanted to save some gas;) |
Yo, Scotty!
JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Dec 30, 10:29 am, Tim wrote: Good talking with you today capn, Francis. I appreciate your comments and concerns. Actually, I think I got the timing wrong, I will check my phone. Either way, I can attach the "tracking code" from Fedex as I was riding in a FedEx Truck at the time, wrapped in a small box... Got some cupons for Christmas and wanted to save some gas;) You boys just got telephones, right? New to your area? |
Yo, Scotty!
On Dec 29, 11:02*pm, Tim wrote:
On Dec 29, 4:17*pm, Tom Francis wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:25:48 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:19:17 -0500, Tom Francis wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:26:59 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: just thought I'd pop in here a moment to say I'm doing much better today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning. Thanks for checking on me. Your dong is doing much better? Well, that is - um...er....interesting. Somebody got a Christmas present! A fake dong? One without the requisite ding? Oh, I see my typing error has caused confusion. I have corrected it on this return post. Questions and explanations *on the dockside ooooooooh...the new "double-secret" posting area where there is still no talk of Boats, just personal garbage. |
Yo, Scotty!
*e#c wrote:
On Dec 29, 11:02 pm, Tim wrote: On Dec 29, 4:17 pm, Tom Francis wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:25:48 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:19:17 -0500, Tom Francis wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:26:59 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: just thought I'd pop in here a moment to say I'm doing much better today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning. Thanks for checking on me. Your dong is doing much better? Well, that is - um...er....interesting. Somebody got a Christmas present! A fake dong? One without the requisite ding? Oh, I see my typing error has caused confusion. I have corrected it on this return post. Questions and explanations on the dockside ooooooooh...the new "double-secret" posting area where there is still no talk of Boats, just personal garbage. And don't forget the secret phone calls and secret photos and secret emails, notification of which they post here, so everyone will think they are...special. :) And they all *love* flajim, the id spoofer, even though he is driving away some good posters. Perhaps it is time to go far afield again, and bring in some fresh blood, posters who are sure to annoy the melange of mooks here. |
Yo, Scotty!
Harry wrote:
*e#c wrote: On Dec 29, 11:02 pm, Tim wrote: On Dec 29, 4:17 pm, Tom Francis wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:25:48 -0500, Gene wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:19:17 -0500, Tom Francis wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:26:59 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: just thought I'd pop in here a moment to say I'm doing much better today. I thought things were going to be way bad yesterday morning. Thanks for checking on me. Your dong is doing much better? Well, that is - um...er....interesting. Somebody got a Christmas present! A fake dong? One without the requisite ding? Oh, I see my typing error has caused confusion. I have corrected it on this return post. Questions and explanations on the dockside ooooooooh...the new "double-secret" posting area where there is still no talk of Boats, just personal garbage. And don't forget the secret phone calls and secret photos and secret emails, notification of which they post here, so everyone will think they are...special. :) And they all *love* flajim, the id spoofer, even though he is driving away some good posters. Perhaps it is time to go far afield again, and bring in some fresh blood, posters who are sure to annoy the melange of mooks here. Be sure to ask the cross posters to give proper credit to their rec.boats host. It's just like you spoofers to pull a stunt like that. You must be desparate. -- I get so upset by these spoofers, that I think I am going to make more crossposts between rec.boats and numerous unrelated newsgroups, because at least that is not detrimental to rec.boats. This group needs some new blood, and that is always a good way to get some new posters who enjoy boating as much as i do. |
Yo, Scotty!
Thanks Richard. Great to hear from you.
|
Yo, Scotty!
In article 47dc18aa-ed61-4f2e-8eee-2bf0f2c03ec3
@p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... Thanks Richard. Great to hear from you. What time did you hear from him? How long was the conversation? Did he get a boat yet??? snerk |
Yo, Scotty!
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:35:10 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 47dc18aa-ed61-4f2e-8eee-2bf0f2c03ec3 @p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... Thanks Richard. Great to hear from you. What time did you hear from him? How long was the conversation? Did he get a boat yet??? snerk He's waiting on Scotty to get screws to build one. That's what he told me on the phone last night. |
Yo, Scotty!
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:03:29 -0500, RLM wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:35:10 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article 47dc18aa-ed61-4f2e-8eee-2bf0f2c03ec3 @p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... Thanks Richard. Great to hear from you. What time did you hear from him? How long was the conversation? Did he get a boat yet??? snerk He's waiting on Scotty to get screws to build one. That's what he told me on the phone last night. I thought Snotty had graduated to nails along with house paint. |
Yo, Scotty!
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:44:56 -0500, Harry
wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Dec 30, 10:29 am, Tim wrote: Good talking with you today capn, Francis. I appreciate your comments and concerns. Actually, I think I got the timing wrong, I will check my phone. Either way, I can attach the "tracking code" from Fedex as I was riding in a FedEx Truck at the time, wrapped in a small box... Got some cupons for Christmas and wanted to save some gas;) You boys just got telephones, right? New to your area? They're easily amused. It must be liberating to be a simpleton. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com