In article ,
says...

In article d02777de-b898-427e-a0a1-
, says...

On Dec 25, 7:14*pm, John H wrote:
...Change is coming!

The NYTimes is giving seniors a Christmas present to ponder.

http://tinyurl.com/yl9vumo

"Peter R. Orszag, the White House budget director and a disciple of
the Dartmouth data, has noted. We can no longer afford an overall
health care system in which the thought is more is always better,
because it s not. "

Another - "Because Dartmouth s analysis focuses solely on patients who
have died, a case like Mr. Putrus s would not show up in its data.
That is why critics say Dartmouth s approach takes an overly
pessimistic view of medicine: if you consider only the patients who
die, there is really no way to know whether it makes sense to spend
more on one case than another."

A preview of things to come?
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

John, couldn't you, at least during the holidays stop your stupid and
inane everything Obama is bad bull****?

Pfffftttt, are you gonna' stop the "everything is Rush and Hannity"
bull****?

I just finished watching David Gregory on Meet the Press interview Janet
Napalitano about the terrorist incident on the NWA flight from Amsterdam
to Detroit. I think that David Gregory tapes up his seams before each
show just to hold himself together and not call some of the people he
interviews the idiots they are. Nepalitano sounded more like Gibbs, a
press secretary than a cabinet secretary. I could tell he was just about
to burst at the aforementioned seams and call her an idiot and ask here
how she got her job.

What does this have to do with Obama? Obama appointed Naplitano to be
the head of DHS. Obviously Obama didn't want a competent person at the
helm of the DHS or Obama is an idiot too in that he can't see
incompetence when it is staring him in the face.