| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
White House Christmas Tree...as expected...
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:56:26 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: On Dec 23, 1:26*pm, John H wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:01:45 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Dec 23, 10:23*am, Jack wrote: On Dec 23, 11:07*am, Not_Now wrote: In article f753f5e8-00cb-4857-bbc5-f952210d0068 @b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 23, 9:50*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Dec 23, 9:43*am, John H wrote: http://tinyurl.com/ye4sjx8 I like the last one. Seems like I was called a racist for suggesting such a thing in a joke a while back. I suppose the Obamas are as racist as I am. Oh well. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H Gotta ask. Do you REALLY believe all of that bull****? Gotta ask. *Do you think before the knee jerks? Taking a look around the internet, it appears that this is for real. After all, the incumbents (typically the Fisrt Lady) choose artists to make the ornaments, and in a past year Laura Bush chose a very liberal artist as one of the contributers. *That artist included one that had the phrase "Impeach Bush" on it, which Mrs. Bush did not display. There's no reason to think these aren't real. *Just another in a series of misteps and gaffes by the current inhabitants. *Mao in the White House. Nope, not real. You'll see in just a very short time. So far, even the liberal blogs aren't claiming it's false, they are just whining that it doesn't matter and Breitbart / Fox is picking on them. *Supposedly the WH has even issued a response saying they were unaware of these particular ornaments. Oh well. I'm sure you'll be posting the link to the definitive evidence that this didn't happen, when that's available.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Why didn't they just go to Walmart or costco and buy 'em like everybody else? Well, they had famous personalities, like Hedda Lettuce, designing them. http://heddalettuce.com/index.php?paged=2 GAG! That's GROSS! Tell 'Bama, don't tell me! -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
White House Christmas Tree...as expected...
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote: On Dec 23, 2:02*pm, Gene wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:43:30 -0500, John H wrote: http://tinyurl.com/ye4sjx8 I like the last one. Seems like I was called a racist for suggesting such a thing in a joke a while back. I suppose the Obamas are as racist as I am. Oh well. Is common sense dead in America? Where was the righteous indignation when the Bush administration prohibited religious themes on ornaments? There was certainly no indignation from the left back then... I'm sure Bush was trying to be sensitive to the foaming-at-the-mouth "no nativity scene" idiots. If there had been religious ornaments allowed, the WH would have been under siege from every group imaginable. CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, etc. camped outside the gates. But Mao? Common sense is dead. Speaking of Mao, I hope everyone here sent the ACLU a Christmas card, preferably one which showed the reason for the season. We sent one with a beautiful Nativity scene thereon, knowing they'll probably frame it. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
White House Christmas Tree...as expected...
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:12:15 -0500, Gene
wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:56:53 -0800 (PST), Jack wrote: On Dec 23, 3:28*pm, Gene wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack wrote: There was certainly no indignation from the left back then.. ...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously unbelievable.... But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian Right Wingnuts" in your mind? Any thinking, compassionate, free person should have an issue with him, no? Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported as fact..... and believed without question by so many..... ...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT..... In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments (isn't that a good thing?) and what do we get? No notice of that, but some preposterous story about Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore.... Common sense is dead.... Gene, you need to read Hedda Lettuce's blog before you discredit the story. Besides, why the uproar? Isn't this expected? -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
White House Christmas Tree...as expected...
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:10:29 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote: On Dec 23, 5:42*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Dec 23, 1:16 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Dec 23, 9:43 am, John H wrote: http://tinyurl.com/ye4sjx8 I like the last one. Seems like I was called a racist for suggesting such a thing in a joke a while back. I suppose the Obamas are as racist as I am. Oh well. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H Gotta ask. Do you REALLY believe all of that bull****? Sure he does... http://www.therightperspective.org/2...ally-on-the-ob... -- Nom=de=Plume I wanted to see how long I could string Jack and John on about this...... They really, really wanted to believe it was true. Sorry.... Pssst... check your link. Theyt've already admitted they were wrong, their attempt to debunk the story is false. The picture are indeed from the correct type of tree. So it seemingly remains true. Oops, so embarrassing... for you. She and Loogy will be apologizing soon. In the meantime.....crickets? -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
White House Christmas Tree...as expected...
On Dec 23, 7:09*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:10:29 -0800 (PST), Jack wrote: On Dec 23, 5:42*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message .... On Dec 23, 1:16 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Dec 23, 9:43 am, John H wrote: http://tinyurl.com/ye4sjx8 I like the last one. Seems like I was called a racist for suggesting such a thing in a joke a while back. I suppose the Obamas are as racist as I am. Oh well. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H Gotta ask. Do you REALLY believe all of that bull****? Sure he does... http://www.therightperspective.org/2...ally-on-the-ob.... -- Nom=de=Plume I wanted to see how long I could string Jack and John on about this...... They really, really wanted to believe it was true. Sorry.... Pssst... check your link. *Theyt've already admitted they were wrong, their attempt to debunk the story is false. *The picture are indeed from the correct type of tree. *So it seemingly remains true. *Oops, so embarrassing... for you. She and Loogy will be apologizing soon. In the meantime.....crickets? But they were slapping each other on their collective backs just a little while ago... Funny how they scatter like roaches when the light of truth hits them. |
White House Christmas Tree...as expected...
On 12/23/09 7:27 PM, Jack wrote:
On Dec 23, 7:09 pm, John wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:10:29 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 23, 5:42 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Dec 23, 1:16 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Dec 23, 9:43 am, John wrote: http://tinyurl.com/ye4sjx8 I like the last one. Seems like I was called a racist for suggesting such a thing in a joke a while back. I suppose the Obamas are as racist as I am. Oh well. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H Gotta ask. Do you REALLY believe all of that bull****? Sure he does... http://www.therightperspective.org/2...ally-on-the-ob... -- Nom=de=Plume I wanted to see how long I could string Jack and John on about this...... They really, really wanted to believe it was true. Sorry.... Pssst... check your link. Theyt've already admitted they were wrong, their attempt to debunk the story is false. The picture are indeed from the correct type of tree. So it seemingly remains true. Oops, so embarrassing... for you. She and Loogy will be apologizing soon. In the meantime.....crickets? But they were slapping each other on their collective backs just a little while ago... Funny how they scatter like roaches when the light of truth hits them. The light of truth? If you google this on google news, all that comes up are right-wing blog and bull**** sites. Of course, that's where you republic-morons get most of your news. Got any enterprise reporting from a legitimate news site? ****, you don't even know what the term enterprise reporting means. |
White House Christmas Tree...as expected...
On Dec 23, 7:08*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:12:15 -0500, Gene wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:56:53 -0800 (PST), Jack wrote: On Dec 23, 3:28 pm, Gene wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack wrote: There was certainly no indignation from the left back then.. ...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously unbelievable.... But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian Right Wingnuts" in your mind? *Any thinking, compassionate, free person should have an issue with him, no? Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported as fact..... and believed without question by so many..... ...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT..... In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments (isn't that a good thing?) and what do we get? No notice of that, but some preposterous story about Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore.... Common sense is dead.... Gene, you need to read Hedda Lettuce's blog before you discredit the story. Besides, why the uproar? Isn't this expected? You mean this? "FOX FIVE NEWS COVERED ME AND MY BALL! Hello gentle Americans. Fox Five News has commented on me and my ball that is handing (sic) on the White House Xmas tree. Who would of thought I would have the most famous ball in the nation! Here is the link to the video on youtube:" So Hedda admits it. This is some funny stuff!! The NG idiots were claiming all day it was just a bunch of Christian wingnuts, just to find out that they are the ones looking like idiots! You just can't make this stuff up. Or, I guess a liberal can. ;- |
White House Christmas Tree...as expected...
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Dec 23, 5:42 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Dec 23, 1:16 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Dec 23, 9:43 am, John H wrote: http://tinyurl.com/ye4sjx8 I like the last one. Seems like I was called a racist for suggesting such a thing in a joke a while back. I suppose the Obamas are as racist as I am. Oh well. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H Gotta ask. Do you REALLY believe all of that bull****? Sure he does... http://www.therightperspective.org/2...ally-on-the-ob... -- Nom=de=Plume I wanted to see how long I could string Jack and John on about this...... They really, really wanted to believe it was true. Sorry.... Pssst... check your link. Theyt've already admitted they were wrong, their attempt to debunk the story is false. The picture are indeed from the correct type of tree. So it seemingly remains true. Oops, so embarrassing... for you. Pssst... check your brain at the door? It's highly important to you to trash Obama since he's president and doesn't look like you. -- Nom=de=Plume |
White House Christmas Tree...as expected...
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:04:51 -0500, Gene
wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:08:20 -0500, John H wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:12:15 -0500, Gene wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:56:53 -0800 (PST), Jack wrote: On Dec 23, 3:28*pm, Gene wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack wrote: There was certainly no indignation from the left back then.. ...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously unbelievable.... But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian Right Wingnuts" in your mind? Any thinking, compassionate, free person should have an issue with him, no? Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported as fact..... and believed without question by so many..... ...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT..... In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments (isn't that a good thing?) and what do we get? No notice of that, but some preposterous story about Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore.... Common sense is dead.... Gene, you need to read Hedda Lettuce's blog before you discredit the story. Besides, why the uproar? Isn't this expected? I did.... "It was there in the silence that it hit me; yes one of my balls is hanging in the White House. When I looked at the photo of the ball, it was not my signature green color...." http://heddalettuce.com/?p=2250 Oh Gene, I expected much better of you. For some reason, you clipped the rest of Hedda's post. Here, I'll put it up for you: "Not only was my ball hanging in the White House, my blue ball is hanging in the White House. I may never get equal rights, I may never be blond and pencil thin, I may never see Lady Gaga in concert this winter at Madison Square Garden (I could not get a ticket) but one of my balls is hanging in the White House with my name for all to see. Just for today that feels a bit better than me having the right to marry. Stay fresh, http://tinyurl.com/yczq6rg Gosh, I'd expect that from Harry, but not from you. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
White House Christmas Tree...as expected...
On Dec 24, 10:07*am, John H wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:04:51 -0500, Gene wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:08:20 -0500, John H wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:12:15 -0500, Gene wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:56:53 -0800 (PST), Jack wrote: On Dec 23, 3:28*pm, Gene wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack wrote: There was certainly no indignation from the left back then.. ...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously unbelievable.... But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian Right Wingnuts" in your mind? *Any thinking, compassionate, free person should have an issue with him, no? Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported as fact..... and believed without question by so many..... ...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT..... In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments (isn't that a good thing?) and what do we get? No notice of that, but some preposterous story about Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore.... Common sense is dead.... Gene, you need to read Hedda Lettuce's blog before you discredit the story. Besides, why the uproar? Isn't this expected? I did.... "It was there in the silence that it hit me; yes one of my balls is hanging in the White House. When I looked at the photo of the ball, it was not my signature green color...." http://heddalettuce.com/?p=2250 Oh Gene, I expected much better of you. For some reason, you clipped the rest of Hedda's post. Here, I'll put it up for you: "Not only was my ball hanging in the White House, my blue ball is hanging in the White House. I may never get equal rights, I may never be blond and pencil thin, I may never see Lady Gaga in concert this winter at Madison Square Garden (I could not get a ticket) but one of my balls is hanging in the White House with my name for all to see. Just for today that feels a bit better than me having the right to marry. Stay fresh, http://tinyurl.com/yczq6rg Gosh, I'd expect that from Harry, but not from you. They're all in denial... They deny that Obama has chairman Mao hanging in the WH, they deny that the dems are primarily responsible for the near collapse of the housing market and banking system, they deny that Obama and the dems are intent on destroying the very fabric of what makes this country great. "My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you'll join with me, as we try to change it..." -- Barrack Obama Change it, indeed. Obama is Carter redux. One term and he's out. |
White House Christmas Tree...as expected...
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:23:22 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote: On Dec 24, 10:07*am, John H wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:04:51 -0500, Gene wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:08:20 -0500, John H wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:12:15 -0500, Gene wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:56:53 -0800 (PST), Jack wrote: On Dec 23, 3:28*pm, Gene wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:15:20 -0800 (PST), Jack wrote: There was certainly no indignation from the left back then.. ...or more importantly, from the (Christian) Right Wingnuts.... who now have their panties in a total wad over something ridiculously unbelievable.... But I do have to wonder... what makes Mao a target of only "Christian Right Wingnuts" in your mind? *Any thinking, compassionate, free person should have an issue with him, no? Mao isn't the target.... the target is the preposterous story reported as fact..... and believed without question by so many..... ...the other target is why it was OK for the Bush Christmas trees to be Non-Religious..... not a whimper from either Christians, Right Wingers, or even Right Wing Christians.... BUT..... In 2009, the Christmas tree is allowed to have religious ornaments (isn't that a good thing?) and what do we get? No notice of that, but some preposterous story about Mao, Transvestites, and Mt. Rushmore.... Common sense is dead.... Gene, you need to read Hedda Lettuce's blog before you discredit the story. Besides, why the uproar? Isn't this expected? I did.... "It was there in the silence that it hit me; yes one of my balls is hanging in the White House. When I looked at the photo of the ball, it was not my signature green color...." http://heddalettuce.com/?p=2250 Oh Gene, I expected much better of you. For some reason, you clipped the rest of Hedda's post. Here, I'll put it up for you: "Not only was my ball hanging in the White House, my blue ball is hanging in the White House. I may never get equal rights, I may never be blond and pencil thin, I may never see Lady Gaga in concert this winter at Madison Square Garden (I could not get a ticket) but one of my balls is hanging in the White House with my name for all to see. Just for today that feels a bit better than me having the right to marry. Stay fresh, http://tinyurl.com/yczq6rg Gosh, I'd expect that from Harry, but not from you. They're all in denial... They deny that Obama has chairman Mao hanging in the WH, they deny that the dems are primarily responsible for the near collapse of the housing market and banking system, they deny that Obama and the dems are intent on destroying the very fabric of what makes this country great. "My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you'll join with me, as we try to change it..." -- Barrack Obama Change it, indeed. Obama is Carter redux. One term and he's out. The Loogy and nomdeplum denials don't bother me. They're expected. But the way Gene did it was a surprise, to me anyway. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com