I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...+Politics%2529

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On Dec 18, 6:54*pm, Tim wrote:
So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...

I don't find his attacks of Republicans and Lieberman very impressive.
I think he's a glory hound.

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

"Tim" wrote in message
...
So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...+Politics%2529


He's always seemed pretty straight up to me..

--
Nom=de=Plume

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On Dec 18, 6:54*pm, John H wrote:
On Dec 18, 6:54*pm, Tim wrote:

So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...

I don't find his attacks of Republicans and Lieberman very impressive.
I think he's a glory hound.

I really don't either, But I found this statement interesting:

""Sen. Franken is certainly not making friends on either side of the
aisle," GOP strategist Ron Bonjean, a former Capitol Hill aide, told
Fox News...

.... Despite his freshman status, Franken hasn't shied away from
confrontation with senior lawmakers, some of whom have spent decades
in the chamber."

Now I understand he's the new kid on the block, but I suppose what I'm
saying is time will certainly tell if he's going to shake up capitol
hill in a constructive way, or if he's going to do nothing but make a
jerk out of himself, that neither side will accept or even really
like.

I'm watching.

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:00:27 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message
...
So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...+Politics%2529


He's always seemed pretty straight up to me..

Some people don't like honesty if it runs counter to their politics.
Hopefully Franken won't get corrupted by the sleazeballs populating
the Senate.
Leiberman and McCain are pure sleaze.
They'll flat out lie with a straight face.
McCain came to Leiberman's defense about Franken not allowing him to
rattle on with his inanities, saying he never saw such a thing happen.
Just saw a clip of the same thing happen to Byrd - in 2002 I think.
Who objected to Byrd being allowed to continue rattling on?
John McCain.
Most of these guys don't deserve any respect.
Best we can hope for is dueling to the death be made legal.
Might thin out their ranks temporarily.
More likely they'd stop their non-stop lying, the fear of the duel
lending them some sense of honor.

--Vic

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On Dec 18, 7:15*pm, Vic Smith wrote:


Some people don't like honesty if it runs counter to their politics.
Hopefully Franken won't get corrupted by the sleazeballs populating
the Senate.
Leiberman and McCain are pure sleaze.
They'll flat out lie with a straight face.

McCain came to Leiberman's defense about Franken not allowing him to
rattle on with his inanities, saying he never saw such a thing happen.
Just saw a clip of the same thing happen to Byrd - in 2002 I think.
Who objected to Byrd being allowed to continue rattling on?
John McCain.

Most of these guys don't deserve any respect.
Best we can hope for is dueling to the death be made legal.
Might thin out their ranks temporarily.
More likely they'd stop their non-stop lying, the fear of the duel
lending them some sense of honor.

--Vic

Like I said. The better the liar, the better the politician.

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 7:15 pm, Vic Smith wrote:


Some people don't like honesty if it runs counter to their politics.
Hopefully Franken won't get corrupted by the sleazeballs populating
the Senate.
Leiberman and McCain are pure sleaze.
They'll flat out lie with a straight face.

McCain came to Leiberman's defense about Franken not allowing him to
rattle on with his inanities, saying he never saw such a thing happen.
Just saw a clip of the same thing happen to Byrd - in 2002 I think.
Who objected to Byrd being allowed to continue rattling on?
John McCain.

Most of these guys don't deserve any respect.
Best we can hope for is dueling to the death be made legal.
Might thin out their ranks temporarily.
More likely they'd stop their non-stop lying, the fear of the duel
lending them some sense of honor.

--Vic

Like I said. The better the liar, the better the politician.


I completely disagree... unless you're talking about demagoguery. Certainly
not for the better of the country.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On Dec 18, 7:00*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...

So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...

He's always seemed pretty straight up to me..

--
Nom=de=Plume

Of course he is D'Plume. If Quasimodo's spine was sitting in Frankens
chair, it would no doubt look straight to you also!

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 7:00 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...

So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...

He's always seemed pretty straight up to me..

--
Nom=de=Plume

Of course he is D'Plume. If Quasimodo's spine was sitting in Frankens
chair, it would no doubt look straight to you also!


You really need to work on you witty responses.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On Dec 18, 11:12*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 18, 7:00 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Tim" wrote in message

....

So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_....

He's always seemed pretty straight up to me..

--
Nom=de=Plume
Of course he is D'Plume. If Quasimodo's spine was sitting in Frankens
chair, it would no doubt look straight to you also!

You really need to work on you witty responses.

--
Nom=de=Plume

You really need to work on your comprehensive reasoning..

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On 12/19/09 12:12 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 7:00 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...

So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...

He's always seemed pretty straight up to me..

--
Nom=de=Plume

Of course he is D'Plume. If Quasimodo's spine was sitting in Frankens
chair, it would no doubt look straight to you also!


You really need to work on you witty responses.


You expect witty responses from the gaggle of right-wing morons here?
Lower your level of expectations.

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On Dec 18, 6:54*pm, Tim wrote:
So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...

Uh oh.....John's going to be ****ed. You said something decent about a
liberal.......

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 7:00 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...

So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...

He's always seemed pretty straight up to me..

--
Nom=de=Plume

Of course he is D'Plume. If Quasimodo's spine was sitting in Frankens
chair, it would no doubt look straight to you also!


You really need to work on you witty responses.

--
Nom=de=Plume

He'd have to find a 'wit' first.

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On Dec 19, 8:17*am, Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 18, 6:54*pm, Tim wrote:

So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...

Uh oh.....John's going to be ****ed. You said something decent about a
liberal.......

Eh, Loog. you know me. I'm the kind of guy that likes to sit back and
watch. I'm not a fan of politics or politicians. I jsut watching to
see what Franken is doing. Maybe busting us the good 'ol boys club is
good, but then again, his regardless of party, his 'in your face'
attitude might come back to bite him if he chews on the wrong one at
the right time. I consider the capitpl round table to be a club more
than anything and it might provide some entertainement to watch junior
Franken as he snuggles his way in on the elite.

I got plenty of popcorn...

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Dec 19, 8:17 am, Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 18, 6:54 pm, Tim wrote:

So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...

Uh oh.....John's going to be ****ed. You said something decent about a
liberal.......

Eh, Loog. you know me. I'm the kind of guy that likes to sit back and
watch. I'm not a fan of politics or politicians. I jsut watching to
see what Franken is doing. Maybe busting us the good 'ol boys club is
good, but then again, his regardless of party, his 'in your face'
attitude might come back to bite him if he chews on the wrong one at
the right time. I consider the capitpl round table to be a club more
than anything and it might provide some entertainement to watch junior
Franken as he snuggles his way in on the elite.

I got plenty of popcorn...

Reply:

A lot of reformers end up serving only one term. Seems like they can't get
the endorsements they need for reelection. I think the guy is one level
above pond scum, but as stated, let's see what he can do. He may be a poor
excuse for a comedian and person, but maybe he can help change some things
that need to be changed. Or even just shake the tree.

Steve

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On Dec 19, 11:24*am, "Steve B" wrote:


...but maybe he can help change some things
that need to be changed. *Or even just shake the tree.

Steve

I agree, Steve...

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 11:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 18, 7:00 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Tim" wrote in message

...

So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...

He's always seemed pretty straight up to me..

--
Nom=de=Plume
Of course he is D'Plume. If Quasimodo's spine was sitting in Frankens
chair, it would no doubt look straight to you also!

You really need to work on you witty responses.

--
Nom=de=Plume

You really need to work on your comprehensive reasoning..


You really need to actually address the issue.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:24:22 -0800, Steve B wrote:

snipped because I think Franken is just the latest who in whoville.
A lot of reformers end up serving only one term. Seems like they can't
get the endorsements they need for reelection. I think the guy is one
level above pond scum, but as stated, let's see what he can do. He may
be a poor excuse for a comedian and person, but maybe he can help change
some things that need to be changed. Or even just shake the tree.

Steve

I'm of the opinion that we need to make some changes to the old bribery
scam that runs our government. Make it impossible for any person to hold
any office for two terms in succession in the same office. If they are of
quality, they could run for a position in the other house of Congress,
President or supreme court justice "if qualified". Stagger all so they are
rotated every two years except the President. The supreme court would
rotate three of the nine every two years giving them a four year term.
They can rerun for any position as many times as they are able to succeed
just no two terms in a row.

More than a limited two party system and do away with a representative
republic with the electoral college. Direct vote by the popular vote to
rule. The country is smaller in it's ability register a vote at the speed
of light that the internet and phone lines represent. Make some real
changes quickly. Pull out and discard the weeds as it is.

We will never achieve self rule with an antiquated constitution. We were
brain washed from elementary school that this is the best and only system.
It is no longer a living document. It has been choked to death by a ruling
party system that only represents two limited views, for limited amounts of
time. Always for sale.

We now have a bunch of "GOLD" bricks that know nothing except were to hide
the gold.

For the rest of you, keep rowing up stream, the falls are still behind you.

Sorry, there is no link for this.

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On Dec 19, 12:48*pm, RLM wrote:
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:24:22 -0800, Steve B wrote:

* *snipped because I think Franken is just the latest who in whoville.

A lot of reformers end up serving only one term. *Seems like they can't
get the endorsements they need for reelection. *I think the guy is one
level above pond scum, but as stated, let's see what he can do. *He may
be a poor excuse for a comedian and person, but maybe he can help change
some things that need to be changed. *Or even just shake the tree.

Steve

I'm of the opinion that we need to make some changes to the old bribery
scam that runs our government. Make it impossible for any person to hold
any office for two terms in succession in the same office. If they are of
quality, they could run for a position in the other house of Congress,
President or supreme court justice "if qualified". Stagger all so they are
rotated every two years except the President. The supreme court would
rotate three of the nine every two years giving them a four year term.
They can rerun for any position as many times as they are able to succeed
just no two terms in a row.

More than a limited two party system and do away with a representative
republic with the electoral college. Direct vote by the popular vote to
rule. The country is smaller in it's ability register a vote at the speed
of light that the internet and phone lines represent. Make some real
changes quickly. Pull out and discard the weeds as it is.

I believe there should be term limits on all politicians

We will never achieve self rule with an antiquated constitution. We were
brain washed from elementary school that this is the best and only system..
It is no longer a living document. It has been choked to death by a ruling
party system that only represents two limited views, for limited amounts of
time. Always for sale.

I dont' agree that the constitution is antiquated. But I do believe
the process works well when adhered to.


We now have a bunch of "GOLD" bricks that know nothing except were to hide
the gold.


If that applies to too many long termers, you got that right!

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

Harry wrote:
On 12/19/09 12:12 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 7:00 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...


So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...


He's always seemed pretty straight up to me..

--
Nom=de=Plume

Of course he is D'Plume. If Quasimodo's spine was sitting in Frankens
chair, it would no doubt look straight to you also!


You really need to work on you witty responses.


You expect witty responses from the gaggle of right-wing morons here?
Lower your level of expectations.

See if they wanted to learn how to make witty responses, they would
emulate me.

At this time of year, the only good Christian is a dead Christian. If
all of today's Christians were tied to the stake, Jesus would like the
match to burn them all.

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On Dec 19, 12:21*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 18, 11:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"TopBassDog" wrote in message

....
On Dec 18, 7:00 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

....

So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...

He's always seemed pretty straight up to me..

--
Nom=de=Plume
Of course he is D'Plume. If Quasimodo's spine was sitting in Frankens
chair, it would no doubt look straight to you also!

You really need to work on you witty responses.

--
Nom=de=Plume
You really need to work on your comprehensive reasoning..

You really need to actually address the issue.

--
Nom=de=Plume

And which issue should I actually be addressing?

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 19, 12:21 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 18, 11:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 18, 7:00 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...

So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...

He's always seemed pretty straight up to me..

--
Nom=de=Plume
Of course he is D'Plume. If Quasimodo's spine was sitting in Frankens
chair, it would no doubt look straight to you also!

You really need to work on you witty responses.

--
Nom=de=Plume
You really need to work on your comprehensive reasoning..

You really need to actually address the issue.

--
Nom=de=Plume

And which issue should I actually be addressing?


Start with rational debate.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

TopBassDog wrote:
On Dec 19, 12:21 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 18, 11:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 7:00 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.
Here' you read it and I'll shut up.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...
He's always seemed pretty straight up to me..
--
Nom=de=Plume
Of course he is D'Plume. If Quasimodo's spine was sitting in Frankens
chair, it would no doubt look straight to you also!
You really need to work on you witty responses.
--
Nom=de=Plume
You really need to work on your comprehensive reasoning..
You really need to actually address the issue.

--
Nom=de=Plume

And which issue should I actually be addressing?

The issue is- Why would a thriving patent attorney give up a lucrative
business to take a flier on a startup used clothing business, selling on
the internet, no less?

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:40:36 -0500, Jim wrote:


The issue is- Why would a thriving patent attorney give up a lucrative
business to take a flier on a startup used clothing business, selling on
the internet, no less?

That's an issue? I can think of a thousand reasons. Perhaps, she just
felt like it.

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:40:36 -0500, Jim wrote:


The issue is- Why would a thriving patent attorney give up a lucrative
business to take a flier on a startup used clothing business, selling on
the internet, no less?

That's an issue? I can think of a thousand reasons. Perhaps, she just
felt like it.


Bad Jim certainly has a lot of issues.

But, yeah, that's pretty much it. I got tired of the corp. razzle/dazzle,
which tended to benefit the company and not the individ. creator. I did a
lot of research before the move. It paid off. I can now do patent work for
actual people without worrying about $$.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

On Dec 20, 1:52*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 19, 12:21 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"TopBassDog" wrote in message

....
On Dec 18, 11:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message

....
On Dec 18, 7:00 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...

So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...

He's always seemed pretty straight up to me..

--
Nom=de=Plume
Of course he is D'Plume. If Quasimodo's spine was sitting in Frankens
chair, it would no doubt look straight to you also!

You really need to work on you witty responses.

--
Nom=de=Plume
You really need to work on your comprehensive reasoning..

You really need to actually address the issue.

--
Nom=de=Plume
And which issue should I actually be addressing?

Start with rational debate.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Rational Debate?"

Is that the name of a company, or product?

If you mean "Start with *A* rational debate, I wonder which rational
debate you are speaking of?

I'm beginning to change my view toward Franken.
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 20, 1:52 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 19, 12:21 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 18, 11:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 18, 7:00 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Tim" wrote in message

...

So I'm really not sure of the guy yet, but I'm beginning to take a
look at some of the stuff Al Franken is doing. like, standing up
to
old party hardliners on both sides of the fence, questioning the
dubious acts of the Healthcare bill etc.

Here' you read it and I'll shut up.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...unny-guy/?utm_...

He's always seemed pretty straight up to me..

--
Nom=de=Plume
Of course he is D'Plume. If Quasimodo's spine was sitting in Frankens
chair, it would no doubt look straight to you also!

You really need to work on you witty responses.

--
Nom=de=Plume
You really need to work on your comprehensive reasoning..

You really need to actually address the issue.

--
Nom=de=Plume
And which issue should I actually be addressing?

Start with rational debate.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Rational Debate?"

Is that the name of a company, or product?

If you mean "Start with *A* rational debate, I wonder which rational
debate you are speaking of?


Feel free to start with or not start with rational debate, company or no
company, speaking of, well... practically anything.

Are you and Rob the same person? Because it seems like the most important
thing for you (and he?) is to nit-pick.

--
Nom=de=Plume