|
They just don't get it...
On Dec 19, 1:19*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 3d7c8dbb-f6d2-400e-a303- , says... On Dec 19, 12:32*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article cb366de3-10b3-498f-abcf-c0b88715c8b4 @h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 18, 8:44*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 9447f5fd-78c4-4463-a85f- , says... On Dec 18, 12:50*pm, thunder wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote: From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. *Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? But that's okay, because as a whole, the democrats want to lessen our need for oil, and pollutants so that MUST be a bad thing. What makes your thinking narrow is your assumption that we don't or couldn't, just because we don't see the same solution you do... Yeah, I know. Raping the landscape for oil shale, more refineries, more coal, same old same old. Again, you generalize and cherry pick what you would want to be our point of view, and dismiss it at the same time... Same old, same old...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Really, how many examples of the above do you need? Well, show me where I said it...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Where in HELL did *I* say that you said ANYTHING??????? |
They just don't get it...
On Dec 19, 1:18*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article d57483c4-1482-47a5-a4c3- , says... On Dec 19, 12:33*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 8fff69e2-7531-426d-b8a6- , says... On Dec 18, 10:07 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in ... In article 9447f5fd-78c4-4463-a85f- , says... On Dec 18, 12:50 pm, thunder wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote: From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? But that's okay, because as a whole, the democrats want to lessen our need for oil, and pollutants so that MUST be a bad thing. What makes your thinking narrow is your assumption that we don't or couldn't, just because we don't see the same solution you do... We've all been waiting for the right-wing solution to the damage that we're doing to the Earth... drum roll please..... -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hell, that's easy. Most of them claim that we aren't doing anything negative to the earth. Man, you are completely unhinged here.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh, really? How many examples of republican politicians statements that spewing millions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere does NO HARM to the earth would you like me to post? http://mediamatters.org/research/200905210011 http://www.infowars.com/top-house-re...co2-is-harmful... Want more, just ask! Post one time when I said that;)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Again, where in hell did I say that YOU said ANYTHING???? Do you know what the word "most" means??? |
They just don't get it...
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:36:00 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote: In article a6f4156f-ff95-4fff-8ad8- , says... On Dec 19, 1:19*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 3d7c8dbb-f6d2-400e-a303- , says... On Dec 19, 12:32*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article cb366de3-10b3-498f-abcf-c0b88715c8b4 @h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 18, 8:44*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 9447f5fd-78c4-4463-a85f- , says... On Dec 18, 12:50*pm, thunder wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote: From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. *Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? But that's okay, because as a whole, the democrats want to lessen our need for oil, and pollutants so that MUST be a bad thing. What makes your thinking narrow is your assumption that we don't or couldn't, just because we don't see the same solution you do... Yeah, I know. Raping the landscape for oil shale, more refineries, more coal, same old same old. Again, you generalize and cherry pick what you would want to be our point of view, and dismiss it at the same time... Same old, same old..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Really, how many examples of the above do you need? Well, show me where I said it...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Where in HELL did *I* say that you said ANYTHING??????? Now you get it ;) LMAO! That was worthwhile following. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
They just don't get it...
In article ,
om says... On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:36:00 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article a6f4156f-ff95-4fff-8ad8- , says... On Dec 19, 1:19*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 3d7c8dbb-f6d2-400e-a303- , says... On Dec 19, 12:32*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article cb366de3-10b3-498f-abcf-c0b88715c8b4 @h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 18, 8:44*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 9447f5fd-78c4-4463-a85f- , says... On Dec 18, 12:50*pm, thunder wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote: From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. *Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? But that's okay, because as a whole, the democrats want to lessen our need for oil, and pollutants so that MUST be a bad thing. What makes your thinking narrow is your assumption that we don't or couldn't, just because we don't see the same solution you do... Yeah, I know. Raping the landscape for oil shale, more refineries, more coal, same old same old. Again, you generalize and cherry pick what you would want to be our point of view, and dismiss it at the same time... Same old, same old..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Really, how many examples of the above do you need? Well, show me where I said it...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Where in HELL did *I* say that you said ANYTHING??????? Now you get it ;) LMAO! That was worthwhile following. Was wondering if anyone was following along... ;) When I say: "Rocks, scissors, paper"... |
They just don't get it...
On Dec 19, 1:36*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article a6f4156f-ff95-4fff-8ad8- , says... On Dec 19, 1:19*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 3d7c8dbb-f6d2-400e-a303- , says.... On Dec 19, 12:32*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article cb366de3-10b3-498f-abcf-c0b88715c8b4 @h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 18, 8:44*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 9447f5fd-78c4-4463-a85f- , says... On Dec 18, 12:50*pm, thunder wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote: From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. *Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? But that's okay, because as a whole, the democrats want to lessen our need for oil, and pollutants so that MUST be a bad thing. What makes your thinking narrow is your assumption that we don't or couldn't, just because we don't see the same solution you do.... Yeah, I know. Raping the landscape for oil shale, more refineries, more coal, same old same old. Again, you generalize and cherry pick what you would want to be our point of view, and dismiss it at the same time... Same old, same old..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Really, how many examples of the above do you need? Well, show me where I said it...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Where in HELL did *I* say that you said ANYTHING??????? Now you get it ;)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Answer the question please. You accused me of saying that YOU said something. You were wrong. |
They just don't get it...
|
They just don't get it...
|
They just don't get it...
On Dec 20, 11:55*am, I am Tosk
wrote: In article 265ff99b-d69c-4853-8a82-eb7f4cf72e67 @d20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 19, 1:36*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article a6f4156f-ff95-4fff-8ad8- , says... On Dec 19, 1:19*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 3d7c8dbb-f6d2-400e-a303- , says... On Dec 19, 12:32*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article cb366de3-10b3-498f-abcf-c0b88715c8b4 @h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 18, 8:44*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 9447f5fd-78c4-4463-a85f- , says... On Dec 18, 12:50*pm, thunder wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote: From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. *Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? But that's okay, because as a whole, the democrats want to lessen our need for oil, and pollutants so that MUST be a bad thing. What makes your thinking narrow is your assumption that we don't or couldn't, just because we don't see the same solution you do... Yeah, I know. Raping the landscape for oil shale, more refineries, more coal, same old same old. Again, you generalize and cherry pick what you would want to be our point of view, and dismiss it at the same time... Same old, same old..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Really, how many examples of the above do you need? Well, show me where I said it...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Where in HELL did *I* say that you said ANYTHING??????? Now you get it ;)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Answer the question please. You accused me of saying that YOU said something. You were wrong. Prove where I didn't say what I didn't do!!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not going to answer the question huh? Because YOU put words in my mouth and have been caught. When John does it, he won't man up and apologize neither. |
They just don't get it...
Harry wrote:
Loogy and justhate - - - morons at play. See when I said this, I was not insulting them because I don't like them, I was just saying it jest because I think they are swell guys. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com