|
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Steve B" wrote in message ... Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the environment isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act. -- Nom=de=Plume Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But that's only for the little people. The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it? Steve Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume I think a lot of these clowns were 'hatched'. |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"Don White" wrote in message
... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Steve B" wrote in message ... Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the environment isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act. -- Nom=de=Plume Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But that's only for the little people. The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it? Steve Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume I think a lot of these clowns were 'hatched'. Hey chickens are the descendents of dinosaurs, and some of these people are really afraid, so it kinda fits. -- Nom=de=Plume |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
Don White wrote:
wrote in message Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume I think a lot of these clowns were 'hatched'. Don't try to *think* - that's your problem. |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"Rob" wrote in message
... Don White wrote: wrote in message Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume I think a lot of these clowns were 'hatched'. Don't try to *think* - that's your problem. And Rob is an _expert_ when it comes to trying to think and having problems doing so! (some lovin for ya for Xmas) -- Nom=de=Plume |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"Don White" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Steve B" wrote in message ... Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the environment isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act. -- Nom=de=Plume Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But that's only for the little people. The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it? Steve Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair. Two, there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll or truck. Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we can have justice. I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick, and got no justice even though I was right. I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in line once more expecting fairness and justice. So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics and governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle east when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all ended up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell us cheap oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became involved in to try to insure fairness where we haven't come out the villains and hated. We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you not notice? I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion. Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is over. Steve |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"Steve B" wrote in message
... "Don White" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Steve B" wrote in message ... Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the environment isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act. -- Nom=de=Plume Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But that's only for the little people. The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it? Steve Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair. Two, there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll or truck. Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we can have justice. I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick, and got no justice even though I was right. I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in line once more expecting fairness and justice. So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics and governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle east when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all ended up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell us cheap oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became involved in to try to insure fairness where we haven't come out the villains and hated. We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you not notice? I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion. Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is over. Steve Oh please be done with me. But, one correction. I would be the one "done" with you. You're here with me. I'm not here with you. -- Nom=de=Plume |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"Steve B" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Steve B" wrote in message ... Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the environment isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act. -- Nom=de=Plume Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But that's only for the little people. The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it? Steve Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair. Two, there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll or truck. Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we can have justice. I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick, and got no justice even though I was right. I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in line once more expecting fairness and justice. So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics and governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle east when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all ended up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell us cheap oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became involved in to try to insure fairness where we haven't come out the villains and hated. We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you not notice? I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion. Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is over. Steve Hey numbnuts...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at the top also. |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
... "Steve B" wrote in message ... Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the environment isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act. -- Nom=de=Plume Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But that's only for the little people. The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it? Steve Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair. Two, there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll or truck. Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we can have justice. I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick, and got no justice even though I was right. I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in line once more expecting fairness and justice. So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics and governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle east when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all ended up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell us cheap oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became involved in to try to insure fairness where we haven't come out the villains and hated. We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you not notice? I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion. Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is over. Steve Hey numbnuts...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at the top also. Apologies. Your point is well taken. Sometimes we hit the SEND button too quickly. Hang around. If you're here any length of time, it will eventually happen to you, too. ;-) Steve |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
On Dec 21, 11:21*am, "Don White" wrote:
"Steve B" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message .. . "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Steve B" wrote in message ... Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the environment isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act. -- Nom=de=Plume Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve hardware and technology. *It does not mean issuing what is essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. *Carbon credits? *Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name. *All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And who gets a cut? *ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. *Rothschilds. *It goes on from there. *It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. *Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. *But that's only for the little people. *The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it? Steve Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. *I think that all children should learn two things by age five. *One, life is not fair. Two, there is no justice in the world. *But, we have these nannying interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll or truck. *Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we can have justice. *I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick, and got no justice even though I was right. I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in line once more expecting fairness and justice. So, what WOULD be fair? *To intervene in these third world's politics and governments to insure fairness? *Well, it sure worked in the middle east when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? *The little people all ended up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell us cheap oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became involved in to try to insure fairness where we haven't come out the villains and hated. We're destroying THEIR environments? *They're the ones practicing slash and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. *Or did you not notice? I am through with you. *You may go. *I will not converse with anyone so ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion. Plink. *I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is over. Steve Hey numbnuts...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at the top also.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Nice name calling Don. Did your suck buddy Harry teach you that? No isn't time to fetch your son some more beer? |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
|
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Steve B" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Steve B" wrote in message ... Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the environment isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act. -- Nom=de=Plume Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But that's only for the little people. The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it? Steve Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair. Two, there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll or truck. Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we can have justice. I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick, and got no justice even though I was right. I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in line once more expecting fairness and justice. So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics and governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle east when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all ended up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell us cheap oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became involved in to try to insure fairness where we haven't come out the villains and hated. We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you not notice? I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion. Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is over. Steve Oh please be done with me. But, one correction. I would be the one "done" with you. You're here with me. I'm not here with you. Hey Bitch...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at the top also. |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
|
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"Don White" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Steve B" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Steve B" wrote in message ... Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the environment isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act. -- Nom=de=Plume Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But that's only for the little people. The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it? Steve Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair. Two, there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll or truck. Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we can have justice. I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick, and got no justice even though I was right. I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in line once more expecting fairness and justice. So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics and governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle east when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all ended up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell us cheap oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became involved in to try to insure fairness where we haven't come out the villains and hated. We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you not notice? I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion. Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is over. Steve Oh please be done with me. But, one correction. I would be the one "done" with you. You're here with me. I'm not here with you. Hey Bitch...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at the top also. ** Jackass alert**..... spoofing real people. |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
BAR wrote:
In article , says... Oh please be done with me. But, one correction. I would be the one "done" with you. You're here with me. I'm not here with you. Hey Bitch...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at the top also. Do you kiss you're, just for you Donnie, mother with that mouth? I do kiss her, in fact, if she has cleaned her dentures, I will let her slip me the tongue. |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
On Dec 21, 1:13*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Steve B" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message .. . "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Steve B" wrote in message ... Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the environment isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act. -- Nom=de=Plume Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve hardware and technology. *It does not mean issuing what is essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. *Carbon credits? Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And who gets a cut? *ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. *It goes on from there. *It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. *But that's only for the little people. *The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it? Steve Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. *I think that all children should learn two things by age five. *One, life is not fair. |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
|
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"BAR" wrote in message . .. In article , says... Oh please be done with me. But, one correction. I would be the one "done" with you. You're here with me. I'm not here with you. Hey Bitch...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at the top also. Do you kiss you're, just for you Donnie, mother with that mouth? Bertie, Bertie...since this is the first day of your idiot friends spoofing me, I'll cut you some slack. In the last month they have fooled better men than you. What's that old saying... fool me once...shame on you fool me twice...shame on me Don't be another Freak. |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
|
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:53:51 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:15:55 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:31:24 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: Thanks Vic, my dear friend and colleague;) I'll answer that this way. Guy and his wife- from NYC - are in Hawaii for the first time, on vacation. Problem is they are arguing about how to say Hawaii. The wife says it should be pronounced Ha-Vy-ee. Husband says it's Ha-Wy-ee. Moku'aina o Hawai'i is the correct way. This is what happens if you **** with Henny Youngman. --Vic |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"Don White" wrote in message
... "Don White" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Steve B" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Steve B" wrote in message ... Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the environment isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act. -- Nom=de=Plume Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But that's only for the little people. The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it? Steve Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair. Two, there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll or truck. Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we can have justice. I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick, and got no justice even though I was right. I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in line once more expecting fairness and justice. So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics and governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle east when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all ended up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell us cheap oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became involved in to try to insure fairness where we haven't come out the villains and hated. We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you not notice? I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion. Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is over. Steve Oh please be done with me. But, one correction. I would be the one "done" with you. You're here with me. I'm not here with you. Hey Bitch...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at the top also. ** Jackass alert**..... spoofing real people. It's really pathetic... must be bad Jim. -- Nom=de=Plume |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"Steve B" wrote in message
... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Steve B" wrote in message ... Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the environment isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act. -- Nom=de=Plume Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But that's only for the little people. The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it? Steve Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair. Two, there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll or truck. Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we can have justice. I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick, and got no justice even though I was right. I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in line once more expecting fairness and justice. So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics and governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle east when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all ended up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell us cheap oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became involved in to try to insure fairness where we haven't come out the villains and hated. We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you not notice? I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion. Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is over. Steve Hey numbnuts...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at the top also. Apologies. Your point is well taken. Sometimes we hit the SEND button too quickly. Hang around. If you're here any length of time, it will eventually happen to you, too. ;-) Steve If you're actually addressing me... I didn't write that. It's some child, apparently. -- Nom=de=Plume |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 21, 11:21 am, "Don wrote: "Steve wrote in message ... "Don wrote in message ... wrote in message ... "Steve wrote in message ... Gene, we KNOW what to do. Knowing the exact % of humans on the environment isn't the issue. It's a big %, and we need to act. -- Nom=de=Plume Needing to act would mean installing technology to cope with the situation. Needing to act means doing sensible things that involve hardware and technology. It does not mean issuing what is essentially Monopoly money to foreign governments. Carbon credits? Sounds like transference of money to me, just under another name. All it's going to cost is $100 billion a year. And where does that money come from? And who gets a cut? ALGORE for one. Lord Moncton. Rothschilds. It goes on from there. It's hypocritical to be talking about taking action when flying in an obsolete GulfStream jet, and having a global warming conference in the middle of a blizzard. Especially when you're spouting that Americans are energy hogs and need to cut back the thermostat, wear more clothes while indoors, and use less fuel in transportation. But that's only for the little people. The lower class. Were you born this stupid, or were you educated into it? Steve Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume The term "fair" seems to be a buzz word for liberals. I think that all children should learn two things by age five. One, life is not fair. Two, there is no justice in the world. But, we have these nannying interrupting parents and caregivers who give the child the false sense that there is a higher authority to go to when someone takes their doll or truck. Then as we age, we carry this over, and somehow think that we can have justice. I won't speak for anyone but myself, but I have had situations in my life where I got the very short end of the stick, and got no justice even though I was right. I think that the liberals shout the word "FAIR" so that they attract the injured child in everyone who will fall for it, and they will fall in line once more expecting fairness and justice. So, what WOULD be fair? To intervene in these third world's politics and governments to insure fairness? Well, it sure worked in the middle east when oil was discovered in 1948, didn't it? The little people all ended up hating us, and we just supported puppet tyrants who would sell us cheap oil. There has not been one country's affairs we became involved in to try to insure fairness where we haven't come out the villains and hated. We're destroying THEIR environments? They're the ones practicing slash and burn farming, overgrazing, deforestation, and the like. Or did you not notice? I am through with you. You may go. I will not converse with anyone so ignorant of facts and insisting on talking of fairness and emotion. Plink. I already have you plonked, that just means this conversation is over. Steve Hey numbnuts...if you're going to remove my comments, remove my name at the top also.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Nice name calling Don. Did your suck buddy Harry teach you that? No isn't time to fetch your son some more beer? It's *always* time to fetch the "boy" beer! |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... Don White wrote: wrote in message Technology is part of the answer, obviously. Transfer of money... what a horrible thing. Western nations destroying 3rd world countries' environments, then leaving them on their own to deal with it. Yes, that seems fair. Were you born or did you just fall out of the sky? -- Nom=de=Plume I think a lot of these clowns were 'hatched'. Don't try to *think* - that's your problem. And Rob is an _expert_ when it comes to trying to think and having problems doing so! (some lovin for ya for Xmas) Nice! |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
nom=de=plume wrote:
It's really pathetic... must be bad Jim. "Bad Jim"? Is "good Jim" the one who obsesses over gas prices at the dock and how they are determined? Is he the guy who hated WAFA for half a decade but came running to his side for no particular reason? |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"Rob" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: It's really pathetic... must be bad Jim. "Bad Jim"? Is "good Jim" the one who obsesses over gas prices at the dock and how they are determined? Is he the guy who hated WAFA for half a decade but came running to his side for no particular reason? Bad Jim is the jerk who just delights in calling me names. I ignore his posts whenever possible. -- Nom=de=Plume |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
On Dec 21, 7:58*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Rob" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: It's really pathetic... must be bad Jim. "Bad Jim"? *Is "good Jim" the one who obsesses over gas prices at the dock and how they are determined? *Is he the guy who hated WAFA for half a decade but came running to his side for no particular reason? Bad Jim is the jerk who just delights in calling me names. I ignore his posts whenever possible. -- Nom=de=Plume I see you can't resist Jim's posts, eh? I would imagine yuou can't resist peeking at him while he's int he shower too! You can ignore his posts easily, but you refuse to. Are you obsessed with Jim as well? |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... On Dec 21, 7:58 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: It's really pathetic... must be bad Jim. "Bad Jim"? Is "good Jim" the one who obsesses over gas prices at the dock and how they are determined? Is he the guy who hated WAFA for half a decade but came running to his side for no particular reason? Bad Jim is the jerk who just delights in calling me names. I ignore his posts whenever possible. -- Nom=de=Plume I see you can't resist Jim's posts, eh? I would imagine yuou can't resist peeking at him while he's int he shower too! You can ignore his posts easily, but you refuse to. Are you obsessed with Jim as well? "I ignore his posts whenever possible." English translation: "I ignore his posts whenever possible." -- Nom=de=Plume |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
On Dec 21, 9:37*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Dec 21, 7:58 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: It's really pathetic... must be bad Jim. "Bad Jim"? Is "good Jim" the one who obsesses over gas prices at the dock and how they are determined? Is he the guy who hated WAFA for half a decade but came running to his side for no particular reason? Bad Jim is the jerk who just delights in calling me names. I ignore his posts whenever possible. -- Nom=de=Plume I see you can't resist Jim's posts, eh? I would imagine yuou can't resist peeking at him while he's int he shower too! You can ignore his posts easily, but you refuse to. Are you obsessed with Jim as well? "I ignore his posts whenever possible." English translation: "I ignore his posts whenever possible." -- Nom=de=Plume So, you are saying that it is never possible and you can't! Well, why didn't you say so to begin with? |
This is How Stupid Hannity Can Get
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... On Dec 21, 9:37 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Dec 21, 7:58 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: It's really pathetic... must be bad Jim. "Bad Jim"? Is "good Jim" the one who obsesses over gas prices at the dock and how they are determined? Is he the guy who hated WAFA for half a decade but came running to his side for no particular reason? Bad Jim is the jerk who just delights in calling me names. I ignore his posts whenever possible. -- Nom=de=Plume I see you can't resist Jim's posts, eh? I would imagine yuou can't resist peeking at him while he's int he shower too! You can ignore his posts easily, but you refuse to. Are you obsessed with Jim as well? "I ignore his posts whenever possible." English translation: "I ignore his posts whenever possible." -- Nom=de=Plume So, you are saying that it is never possible and you can't! Well, why didn't you say so to begin with? ?? -- Nom=de=Plume |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com