In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:24:20 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

Why would an open minded person think that Woods is undeserving of the
award? He is by far the best golfer out there, an brings in billions
to the sport.

Bingo, "Great" translates to "earnings", particularly for the networks
and sponsors.

Sooooo? Lance Armstrong didn't bring in enough money?

On 12/18/09 4:46 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:42:45 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:24:20 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

Why would an open minded person think that Woods is undeserving of the
award? He is by far the best golfer out there, an brings in billions
to the sport.

Bingo, "Great" translates to "earnings", particularly for the networks
and sponsors.

Sooooo? Lance Armstrong didn't bring in enough money?

Chump change compared to Tiger. I wouldn't be shocked if he was worth
more money next year but it will be a different sponsor set.
Maybe E-Harmony.com and Trojan


In this country, "worth" is determined by money. It's a sad commentary,
but it's absolutely true.

On Dec 18, 4:49*pm, Harry wrote:
On 12/18/09 4:46 PM, wrote:





On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:42:45 -0500, I am Tosk
*wrote:

In ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:24:20 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
*wrote:

Why would an open minded person think that Woods is undeserving of the
award? He is by far the best golfer out there, an brings in billions
to the sport.

Bingo, "Great" translates to "earnings", particularly for the networks
and sponsors.

Sooooo? Lance Armstrong didn't bring in enough money?

Chump change compared to Tiger. I wouldn't be shocked if he was worth
more money next year but it will be a different sponsor set.
Maybe E-Harmony.com and Trojan

In this country, "worth" is determined by money. It's a sad commentary,
but it's absolutely true.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

This from the person who's told and been caught in lie after lie after
lie about what he owns!

Harry wrote:
On 12/18/09 4:46 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:42:45 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:24:20 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

Why would an open minded person think that Woods is undeserving of the
award? He is by far the best golfer out there, an brings in billions
to the sport.

Bingo, "Great" translates to "earnings", particularly for the networks
and sponsors.

Sooooo? Lance Armstrong didn't bring in enough money?

Chump change compared to Tiger. I wouldn't be shocked if he was worth
more money next year but it will be a different sponsor set.
Maybe E-Harmony.com and Trojan


In this country, "worth" is determined by money. It's a sad commentary,
but it's absolutely true.

I just wish it was determined by how much time one spent in front of a
computer in his underwear. i would be a very rich man.

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:49:38 -0500, Harry
wrote:

On 12/18/09 4:46 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:42:45 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:24:20 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

Why would an open minded person think that Woods is undeserving of the
award? He is by far the best golfer out there, an brings in billions
to the sport.

Bingo, "Great" translates to "earnings", particularly for the networks
and sponsors.

Sooooo? Lance Armstrong didn't bring in enough money?

Chump change compared to Tiger. I wouldn't be shocked if he was worth
more money next year but it will be a different sponsor set.
Maybe E-Harmony.com and Trojan


In this country, "worth" is determined by money. It's a sad commentary,
but it's absolutely true.

In publishing, a reasonable measure of worth is the number of books
sold. That is the consensus, and some have non-average taste, of
course.
However, the authors chance at a Hugo award is proportional to number
of readers and so is the writers income. Merit pay.

Casady