....and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.
--

Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:10:05 -0500, John H
wrote:

...and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.

Travesty. Clearly, Lance Armstrong is the athelete of the century
because he's actually an athelete.

Golfers aren't atheletes.

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:29:04 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:10:05 -0500, John H
wrote:

...and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.

Travesty. Clearly, Lance Armstrong is the athelete of the century
because he's actually an athelete.

Golfers aren't atheletes.

I could go with the Lance Armstrong idea. But, I figure golfers are as
much athletes as most baseball players.

(Whew, I'm ducking now!)
--

Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:10:05 -0500, John H
wrote:

...and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.

Travesty. Clearly, Lance Armstrong is the athelete of the century
because he's actually an athelete.

Golfers aren't atheletes.

It might be too early to say definitively, but there seems to be a trend
emerging. First Obama Then Woods. Who will get the next prize.

On Dec 17, 9:21*am, Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:10:05 -0500, John H
wrote:

...and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.

Travesty. *Clearly, Lance Armstrong is the athelete of the century
because he's actually an athelete.

Golfers aren't atheletes.

It might be too early to say definitively, but there seems to be a trend
* emerging. First Obama Then Woods. Who will get the next prize.

Are you suggesting this because they are both black? Seems to be the
only common thread of the two.

On Dec 17, 7:10*am, John H wrote:
...and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.
--

Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

What are you suggesting is the large part of the reason he was named
Athlete of the Decade?

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:31:47 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Dec 17, 7:10*am, John H wrote:
...and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.
--

Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

What are you suggesting is the large part of the reason he was named
Athlete of the Decade?

The guy's servicing a dozen HO's and you ask a question like that?
I'll bet he's not even taking Viagra.
--

Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 17, 9:21 am, Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:10:05 -0500, John H
wrote:
...and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.
Travesty. Clearly, Lance Armstrong is the athelete of the century
because he's actually an athelete.
Golfers aren't atheletes.
It might be too early to say definitively, but there seems to be a trend
emerging. First Obama Then Woods. Who will get the next prize.

Are you suggesting this because they are both black? Seems to be the
only common thread of the two.

Heavens no, Loogie. That would be racist. Surely you can think of a non
race related similarity to the awards.

John H wrote:
...and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.
I was at least as "athletic" as Woods but my wife wouldn't let me
compete on other courses.
Darn fortunate to get to play the same course, once or twice a week now.

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:29:04 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:10:05 -0500, John H
wrote:

...and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.

Travesty. Clearly, Lance Armstrong is the athelete of the century
because he's actually an athelete.

Golfers aren't atheletes.

You don't know much, evidently.