Letter to the Editor...
 

To the editor:

I don't understand why the White House is so upset about the two party
crashers at Barack Obama's steak dinner the other night. Is it really
appropriate and politically correct to call them party crashers just
because they trespassed on Mr. Obama?

Does that make them criminals? Isn't that discrimination? Shouldn't
they be rewarded for such bold and brave behavior? Maybe they were
just trying to feed their family?

I would suggest that it's more appropriate to call them "undocumented
guests."

Just because they weren't officially invited doesn't mean they should
be treated like criminals. Maybe they should get free health care,
free housing, free legal services and free White House green cards so
next time they can enter legally. And they should be able to bring all
of their relatives and family members, too.

How can Mr. Obama be mad at them just because they crossed over some
arbitrary man-made border?

They were there only to do the things that regularly invited guests
didn't want to do. (Like hang out with Joe Biden.)

How can the White House punish these poor oppressed undocumented
visitors?

Brian K. Shoemaker

--

John H

Letter to the Editor...
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
To the editor:

I don't understand why the White House is so upset about the two party
crashers at Barack Obama's steak dinner the other night. Is it really
appropriate and politically correct to call them party crashers just
because they trespassed on Mr. Obama?

snip rest of crap....

John H


I'd like to see your reaction if someone popped into your house univited
looking for a free meal............
lets say a couple of those latinos who lived down the
street...................

Letter to the Editor...
 

On Dec 13, 8:55*am, John H wrote:
To the editor:

I don't understand why the White House is so upset about the two party
crashers at Barack Obama's steak dinner the other night. Is it really
appropriate and politically correct to call them party crashers just
because they trespassed on Mr. Obama?

Does that make them criminals? Isn't that discrimination? Shouldn't
they be rewarded for such bold and brave behavior? Maybe they were
just trying to feed their family?

I would suggest that it's more appropriate to call them "undocumented
guests."

Just because they weren't officially invited doesn't mean they should
be treated like criminals. Maybe they should get free health care,
free housing, free legal services and free White House green cards so
next time they can enter legally. And they should be able to bring all
of their relatives and family members, too.

How can Mr. Obama be mad at them just because they crossed over some
arbitrary man-made border?

They were there only to do the things that regularly invited guests
didn't want to do. (Like hang out with Joe Biden.)

How can the White House punish these poor oppressed undocumented
visitors?

Brian K. Shoemaker

--

John H

Pure reverse Harry.

Letter to the Editor...
 

On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:55:12 -0500, John H
wrote:

To the editor:

I don't understand why the White House is so upset about the two party
crashers at Barack Obama's steak dinner the other night. Is it really
appropriate and politically correct to call them party crashers just
because they trespassed on Mr. Obama?


of course, under bush, they would have been tortured, thrown in
prision and denied habeas corpus

unless they were rich in which case they would have been coddled and
schmoozed.

Letter to the Editor...
 

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:55:12 -0500, John H
wrote:

To the editor:

I don't understand why the White House is so upset about the two party
crashers at Barack Obama's steak dinner the other night. Is it really
appropriate and politically correct to call them party crashers just
because they trespassed on Mr. Obama?


of course, under bush, they would have been tortured, thrown in
prision and denied habeas corpus

unless they were rich in which case they would have been coddled and
schmoozed.

.......and smooched if oil-Arabs.

Letter to the Editor...
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
To the editor:

I don't understand why the White House is so upset about the two party
crashers at Barack Obama's steak dinner the other night. Is it really
appropriate and politically correct to call them party crashers just
because they trespassed on Mr. Obama?

Does that make them criminals? Isn't that discrimination? Shouldn't
they be rewarded for such bold and brave behavior? Maybe they were
just trying to feed their family?

I would suggest that it's more appropriate to call them "undocumented
guests."

Just because they weren't officially invited doesn't mean they should
be treated like criminals. Maybe they should get free health care,
free housing, free legal services and free White House green cards so
next time they can enter legally. And they should be able to bring all
of their relatives and family members, too.

How can Mr. Obama be mad at them just because they crossed over some
arbitrary man-made border?

They were there only to do the things that regularly invited guests
didn't want to do. (Like hang out with Joe Biden.)

How can the White House punish these poor oppressed undocumented
visitors?

Brian K. Shoemaker

--

John H

Well, at least they didn't need a translator.

Letter to the Editor...
 

On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:46:37 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
To the editor:

I don't understand why the White House is so upset about the two party
crashers at Barack Obama's steak dinner the other night. Is it really
appropriate and politically correct to call them party crashers just
because they trespassed on Mr. Obama?

Does that make them criminals? Isn't that discrimination? Shouldn't
they be rewarded for such bold and brave behavior? Maybe they were
just trying to feed their family?

I would suggest that it's more appropriate to call them "undocumented
guests."

Just because they weren't officially invited doesn't mean they should
be treated like criminals. Maybe they should get free health care,
free housing, free legal services and free White House green cards so
next time they can enter legally. And they should be able to bring all
of their relatives and family members, too.

How can Mr. Obama be mad at them just because they crossed over some
arbitrary man-made border?

They were there only to do the things that regularly invited guests
didn't want to do. (Like hang out with Joe Biden.)

How can the White House punish these poor oppressed undocumented
visitors?

Brian K. Shoemaker

--

John H

Well, at least they didn't need a translator.


LOL!
--

John H

Letter to the Editor...
 

In article ,
om says...

To the editor:

I don't understand why the White House is so upset about the two party
crashers at Barack Obama's steak dinner the other night. Is it really
appropriate and politically correct to call them party crashers just
because they trespassed on Mr. Obama?

Does that make them criminals? Isn't that discrimination? Shouldn't
they be rewarded for such bold and brave behavior? Maybe they were
just trying to feed their family?

I would suggest that it's more appropriate to call them "undocumented
guests."

Just because they weren't officially invited doesn't mean they should
be treated like criminals. Maybe they should get free health care,
free housing, free legal services and free White House green cards so
next time they can enter legally. And they should be able to bring all
of their relatives and family members, too.

How can Mr. Obama be mad at them just because they crossed over some
arbitrary man-made border?

They were there only to do the things that regularly invited guests
didn't want to do. (Like hang out with Joe Biden.)

How can the White House punish these poor oppressed undocumented
visitors?

Brian K. Shoemaker

passed along..

Letter to the Editor...
 

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:55:12 -0500, John H
wrote:

To the editor:

I don't understand why the White House is so upset about the two party
crashers at Barack Obama's steak dinner the other night. Is it really
appropriate and politically correct to call them party crashers just
because they trespassed on Mr. Obama?


of course, under bush, they would have been tortured, thrown in
prision and denied habeas corpus

unless they were rich in which case they would have been coddled and
schmoozed.

Yeah, and when Clinton was in, they would have gotten the Lincoln
bedroom, a blow job, and access to all of our defense plans for China
and the middle east handed to them on a Hard Drive, what's your point?

Letter to the Editor...
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:46:37 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
. ..
To the editor:

I don't understand why the White House is so upset about the two party
crashers at Barack Obama's steak dinner the other night. Is it really
appropriate and politically correct to call them party crashers just
because they trespassed on Mr. Obama?

Does that make them criminals? Isn't that discrimination? Shouldn't
they be rewarded for such bold and brave behavior? Maybe they were
just trying to feed their family?

I would suggest that it's more appropriate to call them "undocumented
guests."

Just because they weren't officially invited doesn't mean they should
be treated like criminals. Maybe they should get free health care,
free housing, free legal services and free White House green cards so
next time they can enter legally. And they should be able to bring all
of their relatives and family members, too.

How can Mr. Obama be mad at them just because they crossed over some
arbitrary man-made border?

They were there only to do the things that regularly invited guests
didn't want to do. (Like hang out with Joe Biden.)

How can the White House punish these poor oppressed undocumented
visitors?

Brian K. Shoemaker

--

John H

Well, at least they didn't need a translator.


LOL!
--

John H

And if they had needed a translator, they'd be working for ACORN, SEIU, or
be a GS-7 by now.

Steve