|
A little snow mist...
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 10:57:22 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 06:21:07 -0500, "H the K (I post with a Mac)" wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:06:04 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Dec 5, 1:58 pm, "H the K (I post with a Mac)" wrote: ...is falling in the area now, so southerners must be abandoning their cars by the hundreds on the Capital Beltway. As long as you get to say something ****ty about someone, your life is good, eh? It's liberal compassion in action... -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access Give us a break with your sanctimonious comments. snipped for the kiddies Sanctimonious comments are OUR rice bowl. Exactly my point. Not sure who you're referring to... perhaps a slimeball sockpuppet? In any case, my statement stands. You started off sounding intelligent and open to debate, but now I see you were just pretending. Em, there is no "open to debate" in this newsgroup, as much as I would enjoy that. I have iterated and reiterated the point; the opposing voices retreat to fallacy in nearly every debate to no avail. Concordantly, definitions are massaged and skewed to bail out failed arguments. Numerous times I have pointed out the ad hominem, the various forms of ignoratio elenchi, the hasty generalization, begging the question, etc. And every time I do, I'm assualted with additional fallacies to conceal the previous use of fallacies. I deliberately use an expired email addy for my e-nym in this NG, when I first started posting here this summer, for the distinct purpose of defeating the ad hominem argument. (As far as I know, only one person that participates in this group knows my identity.) So, now, in order to employ the ad hominem, antagonists have tried to put a face on me, by comparing me to a former poster called "Reggie," whom I've yet to see post in this group. Doing so facilitates the ad hominem, especially the "circumstantial." And when I (or anyone else for that matter) contend against common, 'designer' stereotypes such as "all righties are simpies," which is patently false and blatantly malicious, I'm again excoriated without due cause by those that hope to foster that calumny. In my lifetime, I have seen, for whatever reason, more compassion, munificence, benificence, philanthropy, and charity from the Christian right than I have ever seen from the Left. And I'm supposed to affirm the "compassion" of the left when its most vocal representatives in this group are vituperative, malicious, arrogant, narcissitic, duplicitous, churlish, sophistic, bellicose, and belligerent? I don't include you in this group, Em. However, you recently asked me if, in my reticence to condemn the demeaning of the vocation of the community organizer, I was condoning the alleged campaign to demean the vocation. I can ask the same of you. If you remain indifferent to the banal ridicule, the wealth of informal fallacies, and the contrived intellectual arrogance of your colleagues, aren't you condoning those sordid behaviors? I'll confess that I have allowed my indignation to get the best of me in the last couple of notes, and I had already decided that I need to remove myself from participating in any of these discussions for a period. The spirit of the whole conversation tends to "dumb" me down, as it were. I apologize if I have offended you, Em. (I apologize, too, for any spelling, grammatical, or syntactical errors, too. I don't have the time to proof this today.) -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
A little snow mist...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 5, 1:58 pm, "H the K (I post with a Mac)" wrote: ...is falling in the area now, so southerners must be abandoning their cars by the hundreds on the Capital Beltway. As long as you get to say something ****ty about someone, your life is good, eh? Out of the mouths of babes. I've been made. -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet,or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
A little snow mist...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:06:04 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Dec 5, 1:58 pm, "H the K (I post with a Mac)" wrote: ...is falling in the area now, so southerners must be abandoning their cars by the hundreds on the Capital Beltway. As long as you get to say something ****ty about someone, your life is good, eh? It's liberal compassion in action... -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access Give us a break with your sanctimonious comments. And what will you give in return? -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet,or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
A little snow mist...
wrote in message
... On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 10:57:22 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 06:21:07 -0500, "H the K (I post with a Mac)" wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:06:04 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Dec 5, 1:58 pm, "H the K (I post with a Mac)" wrote: ...is falling in the area now, so southerners must be abandoning their cars by the hundreds on the Capital Beltway. As long as you get to say something ****ty about someone, your life is good, eh? It's liberal compassion in action... -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access Give us a break with your sanctimonious comments. snipped for the kiddies Sanctimonious comments are OUR rice bowl. Exactly my point. Not sure who you're referring to... perhaps a slimeball sockpuppet? In any case, my statement stands. You started off sounding intelligent and open to debate, but now I see you were just pretending. Em, there is no "open to debate" in this newsgroup, as much as I would enjoy that. I have iterated and reiterated the point; the opposing voices retreat to fallacy in nearly every debate to no avail. Concordantly, definitions are massaged and skewed to bail out failed arguments. Numerous times I have pointed out the ad hominem, the various forms of ignoratio elenchi, the hasty generalization, begging the question, etc. And every time I do, I'm assualted with additional fallacies to conceal the previous use of fallacies. I deliberately use an expired email addy for my e-nym in this NG, when I first started posting here this summer, for the distinct purpose of defeating the ad hominem argument. (As far as I know, only one person that participates in this group knows my identity.) So, now, in order to employ the ad hominem, antagonists have tried to put a face on me, by comparing me to a former poster called "Reggie," whom I've yet to see post in this group. Doing so facilitates the ad hominem, especially the "circumstantial." And when I (or anyone else for that matter) contend against common, 'designer' stereotypes such as "all righties are simpies," which is patently false and blatantly malicious, I'm again excoriated without due cause by those that hope to foster that calumny. In my lifetime, I have seen, for whatever reason, more compassion, munificence, benificence, philanthropy, and charity from the Christian right than I have ever seen from the Left. And I'm supposed to affirm the "compassion" of the left when its most vocal representatives in this group are vituperative, malicious, arrogant, narcissitic, duplicitous, churlish, sophistic, bellicose, and belligerent? I don't include you in this group, Em. However, you recently asked me if, in my reticence to condemn the demeaning of the vocation of the community organizer, I was condoning the alleged campaign to demean the vocation. I can ask the same of you. If you remain indifferent to the banal ridicule, the wealth of informal fallacies, and the contrived intellectual arrogance of your colleagues, aren't you condoning those sordid behaviors? I'll confess that I have allowed my indignation to get the best of me in the last couple of notes, and I had already decided that I need to remove myself from participating in any of these discussions for a period. The spirit of the whole conversation tends to "dumb" me down, as it were. I apologize if I have offended you, Em. (I apologize, too, for any spelling, grammatical, or syntactical errors, too. I don't have the time to proof this today.) -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access You sure are long-winded. If you're unable to participate in a legitimate, fact-based debate, just say so. You don't need to go on for so long. Where do you see me being "indifferent" to churlish behavior. I've said several times that I don't condone it. Are you claiming I should be the ng monitor? -- Nom=de=Plume |
A little snow mist...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message Em, there is no "open to debate" in this newsgroup, as much as I would enjoy that. I have iterated and reiterated the point; the opposing voices retreat to fallacy in nearly every debate to no avail. Concordantly, definitions are massaged and skewed to bail out failed arguments. Numerous times I have pointed out the ad hominem, the various forms of ignoratio elenchi, the hasty generalization, begging the question, etc. And every time I do, I'm assualted with additional fallacies to conceal the previous use of fallacies. I deliberately use an expired email addy for my e-nym in this NG, when I first started posting here this summer, for the distinct purpose of defeating the ad hominem argument. (As far as I know, only one person that participates in this group knows my identity.) So, now, in order to employ the ad hominem, antagonists have tried to put a face on me, by comparing me to a former poster called "Reggie," whom I've yet to see post in this group. Doing so facilitates the ad hominem, especially the "circumstantial." And when I (or anyone else for that matter) contend against common, 'designer' stereotypes such as "all righties are simpies," which is patently false and blatantly malicious, I'm again excoriated without due cause by those that hope to foster that calumny. In my lifetime, I have seen, for whatever reason, more compassion, munificence, benificence, philanthropy, and charity from the Christian right than I have ever seen from the Left. And I'm supposed to affirm the "compassion" of the left when its most vocal representatives in this group are vituperative, malicious, arrogant, narcissitic, duplicitous, churlish, sophistic, bellicose, and belligerent? I don't include you in this group, Em. However, you recently asked me if, in my reticence to condemn the demeaning of the vocation of the community organizer, I was condoning the alleged campaign to demean the vocation. I can ask the same of you. If you remain indifferent to the banal ridicule, the wealth of informal fallacies, and the contrived intellectual arrogance of your colleagues, aren't you condoning those sordid behaviors? I'll confess that I have allowed my indignation to get the best of me in the last couple of notes, and I had already decided that I need to remove myself from participating in any of these discussions for a period. The spirit of the whole conversation tends to "dumb" me down, as it were. I apologize if I have offended you, Em. (I apologize, too, for any spelling, grammatical, or syntactical errors, too. I don't have the time to proof this today.) -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access You sure are long-winded. If you're unable to participate in a legitimate, fact-based debate, just say so. You don't need to go on for so long. Where do you see me being "indifferent" to churlish behavior. I've said several times that I don't condone it. Are you claiming I should be the ng monitor? Long winded? He's a gasbag...and a terrible writer. |
A little snow mist...
On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:38:15 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:12:36 -0500, John H wrote: OK, here's what you do. Go to the local gym and put in five miles on the treadmill. Then go to the range and hit a large bucket of balls, using all your clubs. Almost like playing a round. Not unless you hit every third ball into the woods, never to be seen again. :-) Sounds like my normal MO. I always start with three new balls. I hardly ever finish with more than one of the balls I started with. -- John H |
A little snow mist...
|
A little snow mist...
|
A little snow mist...
|
A little snow mist...
On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:51:03 -0500, John H
wrote: Not unless you hit every third ball into the woods, never to be seen again. :-) Sounds like my normal MO. I always start with three new balls. That would last me about 6 holes on a good day, one of the reasons I became a pool player instead. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com