Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:37:47 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Is that your excuse?
I don't use excuses. I'm trying to understand how your brain, which
appears to intermittently function, can come to the simple-minded
conclusions that show up in your posts.

I've concluded you must be a pothead.
And you are wrong about that, just like you are wrong in most of your
opinions.
But I'm just like you in that I think my opinions are facts. So,
based on that, you're surely a pothead.
Another wrong opinion.
You can't have a "wrong" opinion. You can have a misguided opinion, but
an opinion can't be right or wrong, at least not in the context of your
argument.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Nope, your opinion can be 100% wrong.
Here's a fact: You're arguing something for the sake of the argument.

Opinion = "a personal belief or judgment that is not founded on proof or
certainty"

Get a life Bill.

--
Nom=de=Plume



Me get a life? You are the one arguing an opinon is never wrong.


Wouldn't you think a smart, pretty, young girl could find something
better to do besides glideing around usenet talking with dirty old men
and attempting to put them down. And she wonders why she can't scare up
a date.