RLM wrote:
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:22:34 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:00:24 -0500, H the K (I post with a Mac) wrote:


For the past six years, Prince "appears to have led an astonishing
double life," writes Adam Ciralsky. "Publicly, he has served as
Blackwater’s CEO and chairman. Privately, and secretly, he has been
doing the CIA’s bidding, helping to craft, fund, and execute operations
ranging from inserting personnel into 'denied areas'—places US
intelligence has trouble penetrating—to assembling hit teams targeting
al-Qaeda members and their allies."
Nothing for nothing, but that's a damn risky position for a "private"
citizen to be in. CIA agents have a degree of legal cover. Private
citizens do not. Assembling hit teams could put him in the can for quite
a while. Off the top of my head, conspiracy, accessory to murder, ...

I well imagine there are some foreign contractors that might like to find
him in the open.



And some family members of foreigners who were killed by the blackwater
thugs.

Question: if such a family member came over here and wiped out Prince
and his buds, would that be consider a terrorist attack or a revenge
attack? :?)

On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:39:25 -0500, H the K (I post with a Mac) wrote:

RLM wrote:
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:22:34 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:00:24 -0500, H the K (I post with a Mac) wrote:


For the past six years, Prince "appears to have led an astonishing
double life," writes Adam Ciralsky. "Publicly, he has served as
Blackwater’s CEO and chairman. Privately, and secretly, he has been
doing the CIA’s bidding, helping to craft, fund, and execute operations
ranging from inserting personnel into 'denied areas'—places US
intelligence has trouble penetrating—to assembling hit teams targeting
al-Qaeda members and their allies."
Nothing for nothing, but that's a damn risky position for a "private"
citizen to be in. CIA agents have a degree of legal cover. Private
citizens do not. Assembling hit teams could put him in the can for quite
a while. Off the top of my head, conspiracy, accessory to murder, ...

I well imagine there are some foreign contractors that might like to find
him in the open.



And some family members of foreigners who were killed by the blackwater
thugs.

Question: if such a family member came over here and wiped out Prince
and his buds, would that be consider a terrorist attack or a revenge
attack? :?)

Justice served, an eye for an eye for those that lean that direction.
Too late to turn the other cheek.

There is always a reason if you look for it. That's the reason it was
written that way.

On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:31:49 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:39:25 -0500, H the K (I post with a Mac) wrote:

RLM wrote:
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:22:34 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:00:24 -0500, H the K (I post with a Mac) wrote:


For the past six years, Prince "appears to have led an astonishing
double life," writes Adam Ciralsky. "Publicly, he has served as
Blackwater’s CEO and chairman. Privately, and secretly, he has been
doing the CIA’s bidding, helping to craft, fund, and execute operations
ranging from inserting personnel into 'denied areas'—places US
intelligence has trouble penetrating—to assembling hit teams targeting
al-Qaeda members and their allies."
Nothing for nothing, but that's a damn risky position for a "private"
citizen to be in. CIA agents have a degree of legal cover. Private
citizens do not. Assembling hit teams could put him in the can for quite
a while. Off the top of my head, conspiracy, accessory to murder, ...

I well imagine there are some foreign contractors that might like to find
him in the open.



And some family members of foreigners who were killed by the blackwater
thugs.

Question: if such a family member came over here and wiped out Prince
and his buds, would that be consider a terrorist attack or a revenge
attack? :?)

Justice served, an eye for an eye for those that lean that direction.
Too late to turn the other cheek.

There is always a reason if you look for it. That's the reason it was
written that way.

One of the things the Bush Administration liked about Prince was his
family's notoriously conservative Christian reputation. Sickening.

The Islamic community would be wholly justified in considering Bush's
wars another chapter in the Christian crusades.

jps wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:31:49 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:39:25 -0500, H the K (I post with a Mac) wrote:

RLM wrote:
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:22:34 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:00:24 -0500, H the K (I post with a Mac) wrote:


For the past six years, Prince "appears to have led an astonishing
double life," writes Adam Ciralsky. "Publicly, he has served as
Blackwater’s CEO and chairman. Privately, and secretly, he has been
doing the CIA’s bidding, helping to craft, fund, and execute operations
ranging from inserting personnel into 'denied areas'—places US
intelligence has trouble penetrating—to assembling hit teams targeting
al-Qaeda members and their allies."
Nothing for nothing, but that's a damn risky position for a "private"
citizen to be in. CIA agents have a degree of legal cover. Private
citizens do not. Assembling hit teams could put him in the can for quite
a while. Off the top of my head, conspiracy, accessory to murder, ...
I well imagine there are some foreign contractors that might like to find
him in the open.


And some family members of foreigners who were killed by the blackwater
thugs.

Question: if such a family member came over here and wiped out Prince
and his buds, would that be consider a terrorist attack or a revenge
attack? :?)
Justice served, an eye for an eye for those that lean that direction.
Too late to turn the other cheek.

There is always a reason if you look for it. That's the reason it was
written that way.

One of the things the Bush Administration liked about Prince was his
family's notoriously conservative Christian reputation. Sickening.

The Islamic community would be wholly justified in considering Bush's
wars another chapter in the Christian crusades.

Actually, I think they do. I've read that very analysis a number of time.

Bush's retaining of Prince's mercenaries and those of similar companies
was just another of the ways that admin came up with to avoid
responsibility for its actions.