Sure glad 'Bama's got it well in hand...
 

....'cause we wouldn't want his spending to be causing any problems.

http://tinyurl.com/ykqv7w7

The dumb **** response will be, "Bush got us into debt!"

I suppose that means 'Bama should get us *further* in debt to make up
for Bush's boo-boo.

Only a dip**** would use the Bush Rationale to answer for 'Bama's dick
ups.
--

John H

Sure glad 'Bama's got it well in hand...
 

On Nov 23, 1:07*pm, John H wrote:
...'cause we wouldn't want his spending to be causing any problems.

http://tinyurl.com/ykqv7w7

The dumb **** response will be, "Bush got us into debt!"

I suppose that means 'Bama should get us *further* in debt to make up
for Bush's boo-boo.

Only a dip**** would use the Bush Rationale to answer for 'Bama's dick
ups.
--

John H

Only a dip**** would post political post after political post to do
nothing but **** on anything Obama.
Only a dip**** would abhor the President of the United States so much
that he couldn't force himself to spell Obama correctly.

Sure glad 'Bama's got it well in hand...
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
...'cause we wouldn't want his spending to be causing any problems.

http://tinyurl.com/ykqv7w7

The dumb **** response will be, "Bush got us into debt!"

I suppose that means 'Bama should get us *further* in debt to make up
for Bush's boo-boo.

Only a dip**** would use the Bush Rationale to answer for 'Bama's dick
ups.
--

John H


Yep, it's a problem. I guess you didn't read this part:

"The potential for rapidly escalating interest payouts is just one of the
wrenching challenges facing the United States after decades of living beyond
its means."

Bush certainly did a bang up job making the situation better. Perhaps you
should just bury your head in the sand and hope it'll all go away.

McCain on Black Monday: "The fundamentals of the economy is sound." .. on
the day Lehman Bros. failed.

Then, 9 days later, he "suspended" his campaign to deal with the financial
crisis.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Sure glad 'Bama's got it well in hand...
 

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:25:27 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 23, 1:07*pm, John H wrote:
...'cause we wouldn't want his spending to be causing any problems.

http://tinyurl.com/ykqv7w7

The dumb **** response will be, "Bush got us into debt!"

I suppose that means 'Bama should get us *further* in debt to make up
for Bush's boo-boo.

Only a dip**** would use the Bush Rationale to answer for 'Bama's dick
ups.
--

John H

Only a dip**** would post political post after political post to do
nothing but **** on anything Obama.
Only a dip**** would abhor the President of the United States so much
that he couldn't force himself to spell Obama correctly.

Check your filters. One of 'em's broke.

If 'Bama wasn't dicking up all the time, the NYTimes wouldn't be
talking about it all the time. Did that ever enter your mind? Or, is
the NYTimes a dip**** newspaper now.
--

John H