|
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
|
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
On Nov 20, 8:53*am, NowNow wrote:
Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! Like MSNBC and Newsweek? From your own link: "Fox News rival MSNBC caught heat last week for using altered images of Sarah Palin on the air, for which they later apologized. On Wednesday, Yahoo! News reported Newsweek’s defense of their latest controversial cover, which Palin herself blasted as “sexist.”" Glass houses... |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
In article 2b503e13-e357-4ba9-960e-
, says... On Nov 20, 8:53*am, NowNow wrote: Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! Like MSNBC and Newsweek? From your own link: "Fox News rival MSNBC caught heat last week for using altered images of Sarah Palin on the air, for which they later apologized. On Wednesday, Yahoo! News reported Newsweek?s defense of their latest controversial cover, which Palin herself blasted as ?sexist.?" Glass houses... Harryism... pure and simple. Now that they think nobody will answer from being hasseled off the forum, they will go nuts with every lie Media matters throws at them... |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
In article ,
says... In article 2b503e13-e357-4ba9-960e- , says... On Nov 20, 8:53*am, NowNow wrote: Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! Like MSNBC and Newsweek? From your own link: "Fox News rival MSNBC caught heat last week for using altered images of Sarah Palin on the air, for which they later apologized. On Wednesday, Yahoo! News reported Newsweek?s defense of their latest controversial cover, which Palin herself blasted as ?sexist.?" Glass houses... Harryism... pure and simple. Now that they think nobody will answer from being hasseled off the forum, they will go nuts with every lie Media matters throws at them... THAT is Harryism. Not one word about the matter at hand, just kill the messenger. -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
In article ,
says... In article , says... Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 Geeze, and within a half hour they noted specifically that they had run the wrong video, and about every few hours ever since, they have started Allisyns show and such with a note about the mistake.. Harryism at it's best.... Yeah, within a half an hour AFTER they got busted! But, as suspected because they are Fox, in your eyes they get a free pass, and the messenger gets killed. THAT is Harryism. -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article 2b503e13-e357-4ba9-960e- , says... On Nov 20, 8:53*am, NowNow wrote: Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! Like MSNBC and Newsweek? From your own link: "Fox News rival MSNBC caught heat last week for using altered images of Sarah Palin on the air, for which they later apologized. On Wednesday, Yahoo! News reported Newsweek?s defense of their latest controversial cover, which Palin herself blasted as ?sexist.?" Glass houses... Harryism... pure and simple. Now that they think nobody will answer from being hasseled off the forum, they will go nuts with every lie Media matters throws at them... THAT is Harryism. Not one word about the matter at hand, just kill the messenger. Yeah, cause I just said this: Geeze, and within a half hour they noted specifically that they had run the wrong video, and about every few hours ever since, they have started Allisyns show and such with a note about the mistake.. Harryism at it's best.... two posts ago.. Here, I will make it my sig file for you... |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 Geeze, and within a half hour they noted specifically that they had run the wrong video, and about every few hours ever since, they have started Allisyns show and such with a note about the mistake.. Harryism at it's best.... Yeah, within a half an hour AFTER they got busted! But, as suspected because they are Fox, in your eyes they get a free pass, and the messenger gets killed. THAT is Harryism. Jesus ****ing Christ.. They can't make a mistake, you are hopeless.... But it's ok when the other media just plain makes it up or does tricks lkke "canning" Sarah Palin last week, that's ok I guess... **** this, you, Harry, and JPS can have this forum all to yourselves... |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
On 11/20/09 9:49 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... In , says... In , says... Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 Geeze, and within a half hour they noted specifically that they had run the wrong video, and about every few hours ever since, they have started Allisyns show and such with a note about the mistake.. Harryism at it's best.... Yeah, within a half an hour AFTER they got busted! But, as suspected because they are Fox, in your eyes they get a free pass, and the messenger gets killed. THAT is Harryism. Jesus ****ing Christ.. They can't make a mistake, you are hopeless.... But it's ok when the other media just plain makes it up or does tricks lkke "canning" Sarah Palin last week, that's ok I guess... **** this, you, Harry, and JPS can have this forum all to yourselves... Sarah Palin was "canned"? Aren't there regulations against canning spoiled fruits? Are you leaving *again,* you little p.o.s.? When you return, you can be DK, since he apparently has changed his handle, too. -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:10:54 -0500, BAR wrote:
In article , says... Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 They may be trying to fit into the crowd, you know, like all of the other media outlets. Right, everyone uses file footing interspersed with current footage to purposefully gin up the false impression they're trying to sell. Edward R Murrow did it all the time. It's what that award is for. |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:58:03 -0500, H the K
wrote: On 11/20/09 9:49 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 Geeze, and within a half hour they noted specifically that they had run the wrong video, and about every few hours ever since, they have started Allisyns show and such with a note about the mistake.. Harryism at it's best.... Yeah, within a half an hour AFTER they got busted! But, as suspected because they are Fox, in your eyes they get a free pass, and the messenger gets killed. THAT is Harryism. Jesus ****ing Christ.. They can't make a mistake, you are hopeless.... But it's ok when the other media just plain makes it up or does tricks lkke "canning" Sarah Palin last week, that's ok I guess... **** this, you, Harry, and JPS can have this forum all to yourselves... Sarah Palin was "canned"? Aren't there regulations against canning spoiled fruits? Are you leaving *again,* you little p.o.s.? When you return, you can be DK, since he apparently has changed his handle, too. Oh, and he's using such "vial" language. I hurts my precious ears so terribly! (Scarlet O'Hara) |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:40:21 -0500, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:53:33 -0500, NowNow wrote: Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 I don't think this is as much a mistake as it is just what all TV/movie people do to fill the screen. In a way it may be good that we are calling them on it but if you think about it, you know they are rerunning the same old footage on years worth of news stories. How many times have we seen those same al queda training pictures? It's one thing to use file footage, it's another to purposefully pull footage from other events to pump up the story you're telling. The last time they did this, the notice on screen was "earlier" instead of the date or "file footage" which is the normal practice. This is purposeful misrepresentation to sell a story. It's PR, not news. |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
"BAR" wrote in message
. .. In article , says... Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 They may be trying to fit into the crowd, you know, like all of the other media outlets. Or, maybe they're just a bunch a lying jerks who like to inflame issues rather than report the news. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Nov 20, 8:53 am, NowNow wrote: Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! Like MSNBC and Newsweek? From your own link: "Fox News rival MSNBC caught heat last week for using altered images of Sarah Palin on the air, for which they later apologized. On Wednesday, Yahoo! News reported Newsweek’s defense of their latest controversial cover, which Palin herself blasted as “sexist.”" Glass houses... Did you believe they were accurate? Next time check snopes if you're not sure... http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/palin.asp -- Nom=de=Plume |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
On 11/20/09 1:35 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message . .. In , says... Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 They may be trying to fit into the crowd, you know, like all of the other media outlets. Or, maybe they're just a bunch a lying jerks who like to inflame issues rather than report the news. Well, that *is* the m.o. of the right... -- If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob, achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As always, have a nice, simple-minded day. |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
wrote in message
... On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:53:33 -0500, NowNow wrote: Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 I don't think this is as much a mistake as it is just what all TV/movie people do to fill the screen. In a way it may be good that we are calling them on it but if you think about it, you know they are rerunning the same old footage on years worth of news stories. How many times have we seen those same al queda training pictures? The training pictures are fake? There's a big difference. Hannity was caught doing it, then a bit later, the organization did it again. Don't they learn from their mistakes? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:38:59 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:53:33 -0500, NowNow wrote: Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 I don't think this is as much a mistake as it is just what all TV/movie people do to fill the screen. In a way it may be good that we are calling them on it but if you think about it, you know they are rerunning the same old footage on years worth of news stories. How many times have we seen those same al queda training pictures? The training pictures are fake? There's a big difference. Hannity was caught doing it, then a bit later, the organization did it again. Don't they learn from their mistakes? It's not a mistake, it's a policy. |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
"jps" wrote in message
... On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:40:21 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:53:33 -0500, NowNow wrote: Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 I don't think this is as much a mistake as it is just what all TV/movie people do to fill the screen. In a way it may be good that we are calling them on it but if you think about it, you know they are rerunning the same old footage on years worth of news stories. How many times have we seen those same al queda training pictures? It's one thing to use file footage, it's another to purposefully pull footage from other events to pump up the story you're telling. The last time they did this, the notice on screen was "earlier" instead of the date or "file footage" which is the normal practice. This is purposeful misrepresentation to sell a story. It's PR, not news. Yeah, it usually has the words "file footage" somewhere on the screen... -- Nom=de=Plume |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:18:56 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:40:21 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:53:33 -0500, NowNow wrote: Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 I don't think this is as much a mistake as it is just what all TV/movie people do to fill the screen. In a way it may be good that we are calling them on it but if you think about it, you know they are rerunning the same old footage on years worth of news stories. How many times have we seen those same al queda training pictures? It's one thing to use file footage, it's another to purposefully pull footage from other events to pump up the story you're telling. The last time they did this, the notice on screen was "earlier" instead of the date or "file footage" which is the normal practice. This is purposeful misrepresentation to sell a story. It's PR, not news. Yeah, it usually has the words "file footage" somewhere on the screen...\ Or, a date. |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
On Nov 20, 6:33*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 2b503e13-e357-4ba9-960e- , says... On Nov 20, 8:53*am, NowNow wrote: Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! Like MSNBC and Newsweek? *From your own link: "Fox News rival MSNBC caught heat last week for using altered images of Sarah Palin on the air, for which they later apologized. On Wednesday, Yahoo! News reported Newsweek?s defense of their latest controversial cover, which Palin herself blasted as ?sexist.?" Glass houses... Harryism... pure and simple. Now that they think nobody will answer from being hasseled off the forum, they will go nuts with every lie Media matters throws at them... Whos making the " machine gun " posts now? I thought he left. |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
On Nov 20, 6:49*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 Geeze, and within a half hour they noted specifically that they had run the wrong video, and about every few hours ever since, they have started Allisyns show and such with a note about the mistake.. Harryism at it's best.... Yeah, within a half an hour AFTER they got busted! But, as suspected because they are Fox, in your eyes they get a free pass, and the messenger gets killed. THAT is Harryism. Jesus ****ing Christ.. They can't make a mistake, you are hopeless.... But it's ok when the other media just plain makes it up or does tricks lkke "canning" Sarah Palin last week, that's ok I guess... **** this, you, Harry, and JPS can have this forum all to yourselves... Dont let the door hit your short ass on the way out....... |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
|
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
wrote in message
... On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:38:59 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: I don't think this is as much a mistake as it is just what all TV/movie people do to fill the screen. In a way it may be good that we are calling them on it but if you think about it, you know they are rerunning the same old footage on years worth of news stories. How many times have we seen those same al queda training pictures? The training pictures are fake? We don't know what they really are but they show up no matter when we are talking about terrorists. I will bet you they weren't taken in the tribal areas of Afghanistan and that is the story they show up on most now.. And, you forgot to mention that everyone assumes they were filmed last week by ABC? I know we're dumb, but we're not that dumb. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
wrote in message
... On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:39:49 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: No, Fox just hoped nobody would notice. They're not even smart enough to figure that someone would notice after the first time they were caught. I would suggest you stop watching fox. I don't. I watch Stewart. You might want to start watching The Daily Show if you're not already. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
NowNow wrote:
Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 If the problem is Sarah still drawing mammoth crowds or not, there is nothing misleading. When she was in Noblesville Indiana and Fort Wayne Indiana, the stores basically shut down for retail business because of the number of people inside and outside of the store trying to see Sarah Palin, buy her book and get their pictures take with her. From her Fort Wayne Visit. http://www.news-sentinel.com/apps/pb...16/0/FRONTPAGE Pictures from Fort Wayne (Meijer is a large Walmart type store) http://fwnextweb1.fortwayne.com/ns/p...tour/index.php From Noblesville http://www.indystar.com/article/2009...s-left-in-cold It looks like about 2300 people lined up at the two book store. 1200 in fort Wayne and 1100 in Noblesville. In Noblesville they ran out of books so 400 people were very disappointed. Per the article 2400 people had their pictures taken with Sarah Palin. |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
Keith Nuttle wrote:
If the problem is Sarah still drawing mammoth crowds or not, there is nothing misleading. When she was in Noblesville Indiana and Fort Wayne Indiana, the stores basically shut down for retail business because of the number of people inside and outside of the store trying to see Sarah Palin, buy her book and get their pictures take with her. From her Fort Wayne Visit. http://www.news-sentinel.com/apps/pb...16/0/FRONTPAGE Pictures from Fort Wayne (Meijer is a large Walmart type store) http://fwnextweb1.fortwayne.com/ns/p...tour/index.php From Noblesville http://www.indystar.com/article/2009...s-left-in-cold It looks like about 2300 people lined up at the two book store. 1200 in fort Wayne and 1100 in Noblesville. In Noblesville they ran out of books so 400 people were very disappointed. Per the article 2400 people had their pictures taken with Sarah Palin. She should get the nobel prize for literature. |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:47:30 -0500, achmed wrote:
She should get the nobel prize for literature. Who should, achmed/Keith, Sarah Palin or Lynn Vincent, the woman who actually wrote it? |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
"Keith Nuttle" wrote in message
... NowNow wrote: Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 If the problem is Sarah still drawing mammoth crowds or not, there is nothing misleading. When she was in Noblesville Indiana and Fort Wayne Indiana, the stores basically shut down for retail business because of the number of people inside and outside of the store trying to see Sarah Palin, buy her book and get their pictures take with her. From her Fort Wayne Visit. http://www.news-sentinel.com/apps/pb...16/0/FRONTPAGE Pictures from Fort Wayne (Meijer is a large Walmart type store) http://fwnextweb1.fortwayne.com/ns/p...tour/index.php From Noblesville http://www.indystar.com/article/2009...s-left-in-cold It looks like about 2300 people lined up at the two book store. 1200 in fort Wayne and 1100 in Noblesville. In Noblesville they ran out of books so 400 people were very disappointed. Per the article 2400 people had their pictures taken with Sarah Palin. Yeah... she also got booed because she wouldn't honor her commitment to sign the books. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:21:27 -0500, Gene
wrote: On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:10:48 -0500, Keith Nuttle wrote: NowNow wrote: Gee, the revered Fox News is SO upfront, non-partisan huh? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts988 If the problem is Sarah still drawing mammoth crowds or not, there is nothing misleading. When she was in Noblesville Indiana and Fort Wayne Indiana, the stores basically shut down for retail business because of the number of people inside and outside of the store trying to see Sarah Palin, buy her book and get their pictures take with her. From her Fort Wayne Visit. http://www.news-sentinel.com/apps/pb...16/0/FRONTPAGE Pictures from Fort Wayne (Meijer is a large Walmart type store) http://fwnextweb1.fortwayne.com/ns/p...tour/index.php From Noblesville http://www.indystar.com/article/2009...s-left-in-cold It looks like about 2300 people lined up at the two book store. 1200 in fort Wayne and 1100 in Noblesville. In Noblesville they ran out of books so 400 people were very disappointed. Per the article 2400 people had their pictures taken with Sarah Palin. Locally, Mark Calaway draws the same crowds and is also considered the American Bad Ass (rogue). I'm sure a Palin/Calaway ticket would absolutely close the malls down and create a government, the likes of which, has never been seen before...... http://tinyurl.com/p8c9e Perfect coupling. Palin and The Undertaker. Heros. |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:49:22 -0600, thunder
wrote: On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:47:30 -0500, achmed wrote: She should get the nobel prize for literature. Who should, achmed/Keith, Sarah Palin or Lynn Vincent, the woman who actually wrote it? Does 'doing something' have any bearing on who gets the award? -- John H |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
achmed wrote:
Keith Nuttle wrote: If the problem is Sarah still drawing mammoth crowds or not, there is nothing misleading. When she was in Noblesville Indiana and Fort Wayne Indiana, the stores basically shut down for retail business because of the number of people inside and outside of the store trying to see Sarah Palin, buy her book and get their pictures take with her. From her Fort Wayne Visit. http://www.news-sentinel.com/apps/pb...16/0/FRONTPAGE Pictures from Fort Wayne (Meijer is a large Walmart type store) http://fwnextweb1.fortwayne.com/ns/p...tour/index.php From Noblesville http://www.indystar.com/article/2009...s-left-in-cold It looks like about 2300 people lined up at the two book store. 1200 in fort Wayne and 1100 in Noblesville. In Noblesville they ran out of books so 400 people were very disappointed. Per the article 2400 people had their pictures taken with Sarah Palin. She should get the nobel prize for literature. Ms P of course. After all, she was the inspiration for the masterpiece. |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
It looks like about 2300 people lined up at the two book store. 1200 in fort Wayne and 1100 in Noblesville. In Noblesville they ran out of books so 400 people were very disappointed. Per the article 2400 people had their pictures taken with Sarah Palin. Yeah... she also got booed because she wouldn't honor her commitment to sign the books. You could always forge your copy. |
Fox Being Dishonest AGAIN!
John H wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:49:22 -0600, thunder wrote: On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:47:30 -0500, achmed wrote: She should get the nobel prize for literature. Who should, achmed/Keith, Sarah Palin or Lynn Vincent, the woman who actually wrote it? Does 'doing something' have any bearing on who gets the award? I really don't think so. It probably has more to do with who they want to suck up to at the time. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com