Nancy "McBotox" Pelosi’s $300,000,000,000 deception
 

Can't wait for the Paste Eaters to explain this one.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...111402278.html

Nancy "McBotox" Pelosi’s $300,000,000,000 deception
 

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:08:04 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

Can't wait for the Paste Eaters to explain this one.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...111402278.html


You don't believe anything published in the Washington Post.

Nancy "McBotox" Pelosi’s $300,000,000,000 deception
 

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:08:04 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

Can't wait for the Paste Eaters to explain this one.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...111402278.html

Again, in the Washington Post. It's got to make a liberal pucker up
when they read this kind of stuff in the second-most liberal rag in
the country. Well, maybe it's tied with the LA Times.
--

John H

Nancy "McBotox" Pelosi?s $300,000,000,000 deception
 

In article ,
says...

Can't wait for the Paste Eaters to explain this one.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...111402278.html

Did you read it??

All of this is, to some degree, Medicare kabuki to placate the American
Medical Association. The Senate doesn't have the votes to pass a
permanent fix without paying for it -- though, of course, it also
doesn't have the votes actually to pay for it. So while the House might
pass the unpaid-for fix, it will likely die there. The result will be
another year-long, or possible two-year, patch slapped on this mess.
Finding the money to pay for the fix and, more to the point, cobbling
together the political coalition to support it, is difficult. Which is
why Congress and the administration have joined hands in the pretense
that the doc fix has nothing whatsoever to do with health reform.

--
WAFA the newsgroup liar free!

Nancy "McBotox" Pelosi’s $300,000,000,000 deception
 

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:27:22 -0500, Just John
wrote:

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:08:04 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

Can't wait for the Paste Eaters to explain this one.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...111402278.html

Again, in the Washington Post. It's got to make a liberal pucker up
when they read this kind of stuff in the second-most liberal rag in
the country. Well, maybe it's tied with the LA Times.

According to both you dildos, nothing in the Washington Post is
believable so why the cite? Will you laugh and scoff the next time
someone in rec.boats uses the WP as basis for argument?

That's like me using Worldnet Daily to support a leftist argument.

You both need to move to a less civilized country where tribalism
rules. You'd be real comfy but your wives might not.

Nancy "McBotox" Pelosi?s $300,000,000,000 deception
 

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:34:10 -0500, NowNow wrote:

In article ,
says...

Can't wait for the Paste Eaters to explain this one.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...111402278.html

Did you read it??

All of this is, to some degree, Medicare kabuki to placate the American
Medical Association. The Senate doesn't have the votes to pass a
permanent fix without paying for it -- though, of course, it also
doesn't have the votes actually to pay for it. So while the House might
pass the unpaid-for fix, it will likely die there. The result will be
another year-long, or possible two-year, patch slapped on this mess.
Finding the money to pay for the fix and, more to the point, cobbling
together the political coalition to support it, is difficult. Which is
why Congress and the administration have joined hands in the pretense
that the doc fix has nothing whatsoever to do with health reform.

Hopefully, the Democrats will get their heads out of their asses and
fix some of the things that are broke, as opposed to trying to take
over the whole thing and run it with a hundred more federal offices.
--

John H

Nancy "McBotox" Pelosi?s $300,000,000,000 deception
 

Just John wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:34:10 -0500, NowNow wrote:

In article ,
says...
Can't wait for the Paste Eaters to explain this one.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...111402278.html
Did you read it??

All of this is, to some degree, Medicare kabuki to placate the American
Medical Association. The Senate doesn't have the votes to pass a
permanent fix without paying for it -- though, of course, it also
doesn't have the votes actually to pay for it. So while the House might
pass the unpaid-for fix, it will likely die there. The result will be
another year-long, or possible two-year, patch slapped on this mess.
Finding the money to pay for the fix and, more to the point, cobbling
together the political coalition to support it, is difficult. Which is
why Congress and the administration have joined hands in the pretense
that the doc fix has nothing whatsoever to do with health reform.

Hopefully, the Democrats will get their heads out of their asses and
fix some of the things that are broke, as opposed to trying to take
over the whole thing and run it with a hundred more federal offices.

I don't think anyone sane will hold their breath.

You have to look at it this way. The Dems liberalized banking to avoid
fair market interest rates in favor of cheap, easy, fast money. All of
a sudden banks could lend 10:1, 100:1 and then savings rates to balance
debt went right out of the window.

And any time a balanced system is tilted, it will eventually crash. And
even though Congressional dim-wits ignored the messages, they went full
tilt ahead into more debt.

Dems broke it, it is highly likely they are incapable with their
dilusion of being able to debt-spend out of debt. Congress isn't going
to tell the banks to go back to 2:1 as interest rates would skyrocket.
Hell, colngress has manufactured so much debt that market interest rates
would drag the US governemnt down.

Obama and the democrats don't get it, clueless ****s. You can't
debt-spend your way out of debt.

I fear people will have to change government radically. Recall,
protests, whatever... Obama is doing what the Taliban could not.

Nancy "McBotox" Pelosi?s $300,000,000,000 deception
 

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

Can't wait for the Paste Eaters to explain this one.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...111402278.html

Did you read it??

All of this is, to some degree, Medicare kabuki to placate the American
Medical Association. The Senate doesn't have the votes to pass a
permanent fix without paying for it -- though, of course, it also
doesn't have the votes actually to pay for it. So while the House might
pass the unpaid-for fix, it will likely die there. The result will be
another year-long, or possible two-year, patch slapped on this mess.
Finding the money to pay for the fix and, more to the point, cobbling
together the political coalition to support it, is difficult. Which is
why Congress and the administration have joined hands in the pretense
that the doc fix has nothing whatsoever to do with health reform.

Damn, they must be listening to Rush...