|
How to discriminate at the Federal level
'Bama has found a new way to help him stay on his Messianic Throne.
http://tinyurl.com/yjktpzs If the messenger seems biased, go read the message for yourself. http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf "Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. " Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive' appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there? -- John H |
How to discriminate at the Federal level
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf "Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. " Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive' appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there? Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career" when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside, that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply. The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence. That memo continues that process. |
How to discriminate at the Federal level
In article ,
says... In article , says... On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote: http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf "Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. " Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive' appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there? Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career" when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside, that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply. The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence. That memo continues that process. John's quite adept at trying to make everything in the world that is bad or wrong look like the current administration's fault. Bugger, you are an idiot. The integrity and ethics of the guy leading the organization will have great bearing on the makeup of the people hired into the organization. All you have to do is learn how to read a resume and how to conduct an interview and you can hire mini-me's all day every day. And, in the federal government you soon learn how to promote people out of your organization. So, the ones who don't fit your mold are easily pushed out of your organization. |
How to discriminate at the Federal level
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote: http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf "Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. " Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive' appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there? Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career" when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside, that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply. The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence. That memo continues that process. John's quite adept at trying to make everything in the world that is bad or wrong look like the current administration's fault. Bugger, you are an idiot. The integrity and ethics of the guy leading the organization will have great bearing on the makeup of the people hired into the organization. All you have to do is learn how to read a resume and how to conduct an interview and you can hire mini-me's all day every day. And, in the federal government you soon learn how to promote people out of your organization. So, the ones who don't fit your mold are easily pushed out of your organization. And how does this translate into *it's Obama's fault? -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! |
How to discriminate at the Federal level
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:42:42 -0600, thunder
wrote: On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote: http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf "Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. " Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive' appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there? Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career" when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside, that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply. The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence. That memo continues that process. Right! -- John H |
How to discriminate at the Federal level
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:23:30 -0500, NowNow wrote:
In article , says... On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote: http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf "Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. " Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive' appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there? Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career" when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside, that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply. The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence. That memo continues that process. John's quite adept at trying to make everything in the world that is bad or wrong look like the current administration's fault. "Quite adept" Thanks, Loog. I like it. Besides, anything wrong with the government - it's decisions, operations, or policies *is* the current administration's fault. What, would you blame Bush? -- John H |
How to discriminate at the Federal level
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:08:44 -0500, NowNow wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote: http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf "Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. " Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive' appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there? Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career" when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside, that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply. The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence. That memo continues that process. John's quite adept at trying to make everything in the world that is bad or wrong look like the current administration's fault. Bugger, you are an idiot. The integrity and ethics of the guy leading the organization will have great bearing on the makeup of the people hired into the organization. All you have to do is learn how to read a resume and how to conduct an interview and you can hire mini-me's all day every day. And, in the federal government you soon learn how to promote people out of your organization. So, the ones who don't fit your mold are easily pushed out of your organization. And how does this translate into *it's Obama's fault? Under whose administration was this new 'unbiased' policy instituted? What a silly question. -- John H |
How to discriminate at the Federal level
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:56:17 -0500, BAR wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:11:17 -0500, JohnH, wrote: http://tinyurl.com/yhqn6sf "Beginning January 1, 2010, agencies must seek prior approval from OPM before they can appoint a current or recent political appointee to a competitive or non-political excepted service position at any level under the provisions of title 5, United States Code. OPM will review these proposed appointments to ensure they comply with merit system principles and applicable civil service laws. I have delegated decisionmaking authority over these matters to career Senior Executives at OPM to avoid any hint of political influence. " Of course, there's nothing political about a 'Senior Executive' appointment, those with decision-making authority. Is there? Reading impaired? Or did you intentionally leave out the word "career" when referring to "Senior Executives"? Your paranoid delusions aside, that memo does exactly the opposite of what you imply. The Office of Personnel Management is an independent agency, set up by statute to ensure the civil service remains free of political influence. That memo continues that process. John's quite adept at trying to make everything in the world that is bad or wrong look like the current administration's fault. Bugger, you are an idiot. The integrity and ethics of the guy leading the organization will have great bearing on the makeup of the people hired into the organization. And you voted for Bush... twice? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com