I am so glad...
 

...to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

Also, I'm proud to say that my President is dutifully saving jobs like
it's going out of style. Here's another testament to his savings
ability:

http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/3090

The Man can do No Wrong!
--

John H

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Churchill

I am so glad...
 

On 11/13/09 6:47 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

Also, I'm proud to say that my President is dutifully saving jobs like
it's going out of style. Here's another testament to his savings
ability:

http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/3090

The Man can do No Wrong!

You got it right there, this is all about putting the Bush admin and the
CIA on trial, another witch hunt to distract us from the real important
issues...



What a pair of reich-wing losers you boys are...

The five individuals, as with any other criminal defendants, deserve
their day in federal court. Our criminal justice system requires no less.

The Bush Admin had six years to wrap up this particular package of
rotten fish. It bungled the job. I sure hope there is more evidence than
what was gotten via waterboarding.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to
*communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among
the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster. As always, have a nice,
simple-minded day.

I am so glad...
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Yes, they deserve the best we can offer them, not the worst. A civilization
is measured by how we treat the worst not the best.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

You really need to understand what that means. This will help. It's not like
requiring a farmer to sit on a jury so that s/he can be a peer to another
farmer.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/jury+of+one's+peers

--
Nom=de=Plume

I am so glad...
 

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Yes, they deserve the best we can offer them, not the worst. A civilization
is measured by how we treat the worst not the best.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

You really need to understand what that means. This will help. It's not like
requiring a farmer to sit on a jury so that s/he can be a peer to another
farmer.

Dandy. We'll try to find several juries of terrorists so they can be
peers to the terrorists on trial.

Johnson

I am so glad...
 

"Johnson" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Yes, they deserve the best we can offer them, not the worst. A
civilization is measured by how we treat the worst not the best.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

You really need to understand what that means. This will help. It's not
like requiring a farmer to sit on a jury so that s/he can be a peer to
another farmer.

Dandy. We'll try to find several juries of terrorists so they can be peers
to the terrorists on trial.

Johnson


~~ Snerk ~~.
Didn't you even read, or understand, what the good lady just said?

I am so glad...
 

In article ,
says...

..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

Also, I'm proud to say that my President is dutifully saving jobs like
it's going out of style. Here's another testament to his savings
ability:

http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/3090

The Man can do No Wrong!

You got it right there, this is all about putting the Bush admin and the
CIA on trial, another witch hunt to distract us from the real important
issues...

I am so glad...
 

"Johnson" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Yes, they deserve the best we can offer them, not the worst. A
civilization is measured by how we treat the worst not the best.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

You really need to understand what that means. This will help. It's not
like requiring a farmer to sit on a jury so that s/he can be a peer to
another farmer.

Dandy. We'll try to find several juries of terrorists so they can be peers
to the terrorists on trial.

Johnson


Interesting that you removed the link... I wonder why? Are you afraid of the
facts?

Here it is again...

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/jury+of+one's+peers


--
Nom=de=Plume

I am so glad...
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Johnson" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Yes, they deserve the best we can offer them, not the worst. A
civilization is measured by how we treat the worst not the best.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

You really need to understand what that means. This will help. It's not
like requiring a farmer to sit on a jury so that s/he can be a peer to
another farmer.

Dandy. We'll try to find several juries of terrorists so they can be
peers to the terrorists on trial.

Johnson


~~ Snerk ~~.
Didn't you even read, or understand, what the good lady just said?

He read it and understood! That's why he removed this link:


http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/jury+of+one's+peers

--
Nom=de=Plume

I am so glad...
 

On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:24:20 -0500, Johnson
wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Yes, they deserve the best we can offer them, not the worst. A civilization
is measured by how we treat the worst not the best.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

You really need to understand what that means. This will help. It's not like
requiring a farmer to sit on a jury so that s/he can be a peer to another
farmer.

Dandy. We'll try to find several juries of terrorists so they can be
peers to the terrorists on trial.

Johnson

Or we can find 11 others of you. Do you come with a sickle and black
robe?

I am so glad...
 

Don White wrote:
"Johnson" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.
Yes, they deserve the best we can offer them, not the worst. A
civilization is measured by how we treat the worst not the best.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!
You really need to understand what that means. This will help. It's not
like requiring a farmer to sit on a jury so that s/he can be a peer to
another farmer.
Dandy. We'll try to find several juries of terrorists so they can be peers
to the terrorists on trial.

Johnson


~~ Snerk ~~.
Didn't you even read, or understand, what the good lady just said?


No

I am so glad...
 

On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:24:20 -0500, Johnson
wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Yes, they deserve the best we can offer them, not the worst. A civilization
is measured by how we treat the worst not the best.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

You really need to understand what that means. This will help. It's not like
requiring a farmer to sit on a jury so that s/he can be a peer to another
farmer.

Dandy. We'll try to find several juries of terrorists so they can be
peers to the terrorists on trial.

Johnson

You mean America-hating liberals aren't good enough? Well, they'll get
off free then. There's no such thing as a terrorist. Ergo, no such
thing as a jury of peers. Or, can they just use Muslims?

Will they get enrolled in a witness protection program when they get
off on any of the technicalities sure to be fought over?
--

John H

I am so glad...
 

jps wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:24:20 -0500, Johnson
wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Yes, they deserve the best we can offer them, not the worst. A civilization
is measured by how we treat the worst not the best.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

You really need to understand what that means. This will help. It's not like
requiring a farmer to sit on a jury so that s/he can be a peer to another
farmer.

Dandy. We'll try to find several juries of terrorists so they can be
peers to the terrorists on trial.

Johnson

Or we can find 11 others of you. Do you come with a sickle and black
robe?

A .38 and a smile. **** them.

Rob

I am so glad...
 

"Rob" wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:24:20 -0500, Johnson
wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Yes, they deserve the best we can offer them, not the worst. A
civilization
is measured by how we treat the worst not the best.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

You really need to understand what that means. This will help. It's not
like
requiring a farmer to sit on a jury so that s/he can be a peer to
another
farmer.

Dandy. We'll try to find several juries of terrorists so they can be
peers to the terrorists on trial.

Johnson

Or we can find 11 others of you. Do you come with a sickle and black
robe?

A .38 and a smile. **** them.

Rob


Yep... no due process now
Dick Cheney no rule of law,
just lying about.

Heh... I just made a haiku.


--
Nom=de=Plume

I am so glad...
 

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

Also, I'm proud to say that my President is dutifully saving jobs like
it's going out of style. Here's another testament to his savings
ability:

http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/3090

The Man can do No Wrong!

You got it right there, this is all about putting the Bush admin and the
CIA on trial, another witch hunt to distract us from the real important
issues...

Right.........

--
WAFA the newsgroup liar free!

I am so glad...
 

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:24:20 -0500, Johnson
wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Yes, they deserve the best we can offer them, not the worst. A
civilization
is measured by how we treat the worst not the best.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

You really need to understand what that means. This will help. It's not
like
requiring a farmer to sit on a jury so that s/he can be a peer to
another
farmer.

Dandy. We'll try to find several juries of terrorists so they can be
peers to the terrorists on trial.

Johnson

Or we can find 11 others of you. Do you come with a sickle and black
robe?

A .38 and a smile. **** them.

Rob


Yep... no due process now
Dick Cheney no rule of law,
just lying about.

Heh... I just made a haiku.




So I won't make the jury?

Rob

I am so glad...
 

"Rob" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:24:20 -0500, Johnson
wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
..to hear that Obama is going to try the five 9/11 terrorists in
accordance with our laws in New York City. These people deserve the
best lawyers, the protections afforded by our Constitution, and a
trial by a jury of their peers.

Yes, they deserve the best we can offer them, not the worst. A
civilization
is measured by how we treat the worst not the best.

Peers? Say what? Well, there's always folks like jps, Harry, the
plum,
Pelosi, and the entire ACLU, who will be glad to put the Bush
administration and the CIA on 'trial'. If they get a *real* jury of
their peers, maybe they'll even be allowed to go free! Yippee!

You really need to understand what that means. This will help. It's
not
like
requiring a farmer to sit on a jury so that s/he can be a peer to
another
farmer.

Dandy. We'll try to find several juries of terrorists so they can be
peers to the terrorists on trial.

Johnson

Or we can find 11 others of you. Do you come with a sickle and black
robe?

A .38 and a smile. **** them.

Rob


Yep... no due process now
Dick Cheney no rule of law,
just lying about.

Heh... I just made a haiku.




So I won't make the jury?

Rob


Are you qualified? It doesn't seem so, as it requires you to actually listen
to both sides before making a judgement.

--
Nom=de=Plume